To: Rob Kossler
Cc: Ettus Mail List
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] two X310s in one RFNoC flowgraph
I just realized that the order of IP addresses in Device3 matters for boxes
that aren't TwinRX as well. So this isn't a multi_usrp twinrx problem, but a
more generic one.
___
Ettus Mail List
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] two X310s in one RFNoC flowgraph
One more piece of information. If in my device address list in Device3, I put
my 52.2 ip before the 42.2 ip, it seems to not die like before. This again
makes me think that it is grabbing things and randomly assigning wh
Kossler
Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 2:19 PM
To: Jason Matusiak
Cc: Ettus Mail List
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] two X310s in one RFNoC flowgraph
Not sure..
This may be irrelevant, but I noticed that you only have 2 FFT and 2 fosphor
blocks per device, whereas the TwinRx has 4 channels since the
to which IP, yet something else has already the IPs, so
> it is a crap-shoot.
>
> --
> *From:* Jason Matusiak
> *Sent:* Friday, February 1, 2019 1:53 PM
> *To:* Rob Kossler
> *Cc:* Ettus Mail List
> *Subject:* Re: [USRP-users] two X310s in one
it is a crap-shoot.
From: Jason Matusiak
Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 1:53 PM
To: Rob Kossler
Cc: Ettus Mail List
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] two X310s in one RFNoC flowgraph
I needed to make some mods to your command, but it seems to have worked. Not
sure why it
notes in the manual for instructions.
> EnvironmentError: OSError: error in pthread_setschedparam
> [00:00:06.656038] Testing receive rate 25.000000 Msps on 8 channels
> [00:00:17.357375] Benchmark complete.
>
>
> Benchmark rate summary:
> Num received samples: 198981
the two devices, and then there is a
race condition with which one responds first
____________
From: Rob Kossler mailto:rkoss...@nd.edu>>
Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 1:28 PM
To: Jason Matusiak
Cc: Ettus Mail List
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] two X310s in one RFNoC flowg
-
> *From:* Rob Kossler
> *Sent:* Friday, February 1, 2019 1:28 PM
> *To:* Jason Matusiak
> *Cc:* Ettus Mail List
> *Subject:* Re: [USRP-users] two X310s in one RFNoC flowgraph
>
> If you use 2 X310 with non-TwinRx daughterboards, it can work with the
> same flowgra
of issue where it assigns IP addresses to the two devices, and then there is a
race condition with which one responds first
From: Rob Kossler
Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 1:28 PM
To: Jason Matusiak
Cc: Ettus Mail List
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] two X310s in one
h device, it thinks that there is only one device
>
>
> ------------------
> *From:* Rob Kossler
> *Sent:* Friday, February 1, 2019 1:14 PM
> *To:* Jason Matusiak
> *Cc:* Ettus Mail List
> *Subject:* Re: [USRP-users] two X310s in one RFNoC flowgraph
>
> How
t feels like it only tries to talk to the first
one it sees.
From: Rob Kossler mailto:rkoss...@nd.edu>>
Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 1:08 PM
To: Jason Matusiak
Cc: Ettus Mail List
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] two X310s in one RFNoC flowgraph
Perhaps run uhd_
---
> *From:* Rob Kossler
> *Sent:* Friday, February 1, 2019 1:08 PM
> *To:* Jason Matusiak
> *Cc:* Ettus Mail List
> *Subject:* Re: [USRP-users] two X310s in one RFNoC flowgraph
>
> Perhaps run uhd_usrp_probe with
> --args="addr0=192.168.30.2,addr1=192.168.40.2&quo
Mail List
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] two X310s in one RFNoC flowgraph
Perhaps run uhd_usrp_probe with --args="addr0=192.168.30.2,addr1=192.168.40.2"
and make sure that it is happy and shows you all of the blocks.
Rob
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 12:17 PM Jason Matusiak
-
> *From:* Jason Matusiak
> *Sent:* Friday, February 1, 2019 9:43 AM
> *To:* Rob Kossler
> *Cc:* Ettus Mail List
> *Subject:* Re: [USRP-users] two X310s in one RFNoC flowgraph
>
>
> Rob,
>
>
> I just figured it out (I found lots of people asking the ques
hings.
From: Jason Matusiak
Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 9:43 AM
To: Rob Kossler
Cc: Ettus Mail List
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] two X310s in one RFNoC flowgraph
Rob,
I just figured it out (I found lots of people asking the question, but no
answers, so hopefully thi
w, Device 0 will get associated with addr0, and device 1 will get associates
with addr1.
I hope that makes sense and helps someone.
From: Rob Kossler
Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 9:23 AM
To: Jason Matusiak
Cc: Ettus Mail List
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] tw
Hi Jason,
Given that under the hood, the stock multi_usrp (along with legacy_compat)
implements an RFNoC graph, it must be possible. I have run multiple X310s
with the stock multi_usrp. I have looked at legacy_compat pretty
thoroughly and it keeps track of blocks as a function of device number
(m
17 matches
Mail list logo
