Hello Robin,
Thanks for the reply. We quickly tried your suggestion, and it seems to
work fine!
We first thought it was impossible to have 2 living streamers at the same
time, because of the next comment in uhd/device.hpp
Note: There can always only be one streamer. When calling get_tx_stream()
1 persistent streamer per channel, no tearing down and starting up, and do
timed transmits on the desired channel(s)...
Although you havent said much about your physical setup and what you are
actually trying to do, I can understand the need to keep things private, but if
there are further thi
Hello Keith,
Thanks for the reply.
Actually, this is an idea we had too. But it would require sending too much
data, because we connect to 16 X300 at 25MSPS.
I was wondering if Ettus had a better strategy for this use-case.
Thanks!
Serge
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Is it feasible for your application to just have one streamer for all your
X300s, but just stream 0s on the channels you arent using? I have also
found that re-configuring streamers is messy.
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Serge Malo via USRP-users <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi all,
We are building an application using multiple X300s under Ubuntu 16.04,
using UHD 3.10.3.0
The application needs to transmit data to different X300s, depending on the
status of the application.
So, each time we need to transmit data to a different set of X300s, we
destroy and re-create a u
