Re: [USRP-users] UBX 10-500 MHz Question

2020-04-13 Thread Marcus Müller via USRP-users
Hi Bob, hi Sam, top of my head, UBX-160 doesn't even have adjustable bandwidth (basically, of the modern devices, only AD9xxx-based systems have). So, yeah, you'll always get a two-sided84 MHz analog bandwidth (that's how you get 160 MHz in complex baseband). You'll notice when oversampling at 200

Re: [USRP-users] UBX 10-500 MHz Question

2020-04-09 Thread Sam Reiter via USRP-users
Bob, The 84MHz bandwidth constraint is because of the analog bandpass filter [1] on the UBX's RX signal path [2]. I'd guess that UHD will yell at you if you feed in an invalid bandwidth, but I've never tried it. If I remember correctly, you can sample at rates that aren't an even division of the M

Re: [USRP-users] UBX 10-500 MHz Question

2020-04-08 Thread Brian Padalino via USRP-users
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 5:49 PM Tillson, Bob (US) via USRP-users < usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > so with the UBX-160 on an X310, there is the following caveat: > > > > * The UBX 160 transmitter path has 160 MHz of bandwidth throughout the > full frequency range of the device; the receiver pa

[USRP-users] UBX 10-500 MHz Question

2020-04-08 Thread Tillson, Bob (US) via USRP-users
so with the UBX-160 on an X310, there is the following caveat: * The UBX 160 transmitter path has 160 MHz of bandwidth throughout the full frequency range of the device; the receiver path has 84 MHz of bandwidth for center frequencies from 10 MHz to 500 MHz. I guess my question is how does this