With an FMCW radar and a matched filter, the leakage signal will be at a
different range (close to zero range) than the targets. So, you could just
ignore this range region of your results. But, if the leakage signal is
strong enough to either saturate the A/D or to cause the corresponding
range
Are your TX and RX antennas right next to one another?
--M
On Sun, Mar 2, 2025 at 10:07 AM wrote:
> There is one “RF A” channel, one antenna for the TX/RX port, and one
> antenna for the RX. I don’t need to use a circulator because I made my
> custom conjugate multiplication block.
> __
There is one “RF A” channel, one antenna for the TX/RX port, and one antenna
for the RX. I don’t need to use a circulator because I made my custom conjugate
multiplication block.
___
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe s
On 27/02/2025 09:31, Rob Kossler via USRP-users wrote:
If you are using timed commands and if you can verify that the
tx-to-rx synchronization is consistent every time, perhaps you could
measure the leakage signal (with attenuators connected to the RF
ports) and then simply subtract this signal
If you are using timed commands and if you can verify that the tx-to-rx
synchronization is consistent every time, perhaps you could measure the
leakage signal (with attenuators connected to the RF ports) and then simply
subtract this signal from your over-the-air measurements. This method of
leaka
