15:22
To: Rob Kossler mailto:rkoss...@nd.edu>>
Cc: Oliver Towlson
mailto:oliver.towl...@gmvnsl.com>>;
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com<mailto:USRP-users@lists.ettus.com>
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] Re: X310 with dual TwinRX set up
Also try running at a lower sample rate at first. Just
o:patchvonbr...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 12 March 2021 15:22
> *To:* Rob Kossler
> *Cc:* Oliver Towlson ;
> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> *Subject:* Re: [USRP-users] Re: X310 with dual TwinRX set up
>
>
>
> Also try running at a lower sample rate at first. Just to see that y
D Leech [mailto:patchvonbr...@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 March 2021 15:22
To: Rob Kossler
Cc: Oliver Towlson ; USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] Re: X310 with dual TwinRX set up
Also try running at a lower sample rate at first. Just to see that you have the
logic correct.
Sent
Also try running at a lower sample rate at first. Just to see that you have the
logic correct.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 12, 2021, at 9:18 AM, Rob Kossler wrote:
>
>
> Is there any chance that your code is attempting to set the master clock
> rate? If so, perhaps see what happens if yo
Is there any chance that your code is attempting to set the master clock
rate? If so, perhaps see what happens if you don't set it in order to let
it be set automatically.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 8:55 AM Oliver Towlson
wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
>
>
> Thanks so much for your quick responses. Seems
Hi everyone
Thanks so much for your quick responses. Seems like the thing we were missing
was that subdev spec - once that was set it was straightforward to generate the
code.
We tried running it and got the following:
[INFO] [UHD] linux; GNU C++ version 9.2.1 20200304; Boost_107100;
UHD_3.15
