11, 2021 10:00 AM
To: Robert Clancy
Cc: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: [USRP-users] Re: Timing discrepencies with X310 vs N320
Hi Robert,
I'm not sure if you are talking about the delay that Marcus suggested or the
delay that I suggested. These 2 are different. My suggestion was t
elay
> between the two calls and see if that makes a difference though.
>
>
> Robert
> --
> *From:* Marcus D. Leech
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 10, 2021 5:13:37 PM
> *To:* Rob Kossler
> *Cc:* usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
> *Subject:* [U
obert
From: Marcus D. Leech
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2021 5:13:37 PM
To: Rob Kossler
Cc: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: [USRP-users] Re: Timing discrepencies with X310 vs N320
On 2021-11-10 17:09, Rob Kossler wrote:
I have had a similar issue. My theory is that the
On 2021-11-10 17:09, Rob Kossler wrote:
I have had a similar issue. My theory is that there is some delay in
the PPS input circuitry and that it is different between N320 and X310
such that it is effectively analogous to using different length PPS
cables to the X310 devices as compared to the
I have had a similar issue. My theory is that there is some delay in the
PPS input circuitry and that it is different between N320 and X310 such
that it is effectively analogous to using different length PPS cables to
the X310 devices as compared to the N320 devices. If this is true, then I
expect
On 2021-11-10 14:40, Robert Clancy via USRP-users wrote:
TLDR- Setting the time ( set_time_next_pps() ) on (multiple) X310
doesn't result in USRP time being aligned with PPS edge. Works on N320.
I have two X310's and an N320 as well as an Octoclock. The Octoclock
does have GPS lock. All fou
