On 25/11/2024 07:12, yibinden...@outlook.com wrote:
I think I’ve found the problem. My data was of type |np.complex128|,
and perhaps the USRP only used part of it or treated one sample as
two? When I changed the data type to |np.complex64|, the issue seemed
to be resolved. Thanks again for yo
I think I’ve found the problem. My data was of type `np.complex128`, and
perhaps the USRP only used part of it or treated one sample as two? When I
changed the data type to `np.complex64`, the issue seemed to be resolved.
Thanks again for your help!
__
On 15/11/2024 08:19, yibinden...@outlook.com wrote:
Hi Müller and Leech,
Thanks for your help, and sorry for the ambiguity in my description.
The signal I used in my first figure was a rectangular wave. In the
other two figures, I used QAM-modulated data packets filtered with a
root-raised c
On 11/11/2024 10:10, Marcus Müller wrote:
Hello!
Regarding what you see in trailing, my guess is that this is the step
response of the built-in DC offset cancellation filter; "DC offset
cancellation" is high-pass filter behaviour. This affects only
frequencies in your signal that are very lo
Hello!
Regarding what you see in trailing, my guess is that this is the step response of the
built-in DC offset cancellation filter; "DC offset cancellation" is high-pass filter
behaviour. This affects only frequencies in your signal that are very low. It is meant to
remove imperfections that
