[USRP-users] Re: Reflected power on USRP B200

2021-04-21 Thread Martin Elfvelin via USRP-users
There is indeed a pre-amp installed close to the antenna, there is however no need for switching there since it has an integrated bypass controlled by a Bias-Tee. The installation of the antenna (VHF/UHF crossed yagi-Uda) and pre-amps etc is already done since many years ago. The RX and TX frequen

[USRP-users] Re: Reflected power on USRP B200

2021-04-20 Thread radiogeek381
With the B210’s noise figure, you’re going to want a pre-amp in the line near the antenna anyway. It is worth considering how you want to do that plumbing. With my 10GHz transceivers, I run independent RX and TX lines up to the feed. The preamp takes the beating (though the isolation on my

[USRP-users] Re: Reflected power on USRP B200

2021-04-20 Thread Martin Elfvelin via USRP-users
Thanks everyone for your input. Transmitting and receiving will be on the same frequency. I'm leaning towards using the ZFLM-252-1WL-S+ power limiter as Kent Torell suggested to keep down the number of active components. Best regards, Martin Elfvelin On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:33 PM Marcus D Leec

[USRP-users] Re: Reflected power on USRP B200

2021-04-19 Thread Marcus D Leech
Basically like many things in the analog RF world, there are a plethora of ways to “plumb” this type of stuff. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 19, 2021, at 5:56 PM, brendan.horsfi...@vectalabs.com wrote: > >  > OK, that makes sense. > > Note that a double-junction circulator can give even high

[USRP-users] Re: Reflected power on USRP B200

2021-04-19 Thread brendan . horsfield
OK, that makes sense. Note that a double-junction circulator can give even higher isolation, e.g. 40-50 dB. ___ USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com

[USRP-users] Re: Reflected power on USRP B200

2021-04-19 Thread Marcus D Leech
I was thinking a switch would get moved to the RX port of the circulator, which would see the TX power reduced by 20dB. Then into a switch that switched the RX port of the circulator between a 50 ohm load and the RX port. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 19, 2021, at 5:13 PM, Brendan Horsfield >

[USRP-users] Re: Reflected power on USRP B200

2021-04-19 Thread Brendan Horsfield
Martin, Marcus, I don't see how adding a circulator will protect the Rx port of the USRP without blocking the signal from the CubeSat as well. Are you transmitting and receiving on different frequencies? If so, you could insert a filter between the Rx port and the switch to block the Tx frequenci

[USRP-users] Re: Reflected power on USRP B200

2021-04-19 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 04/19/2021 09:49 AM, Martin Elfvelin wrote: Thank you for your input. Do you suggest adding a circulator to the system or rather replacing the switch with a circulator? Best regards, Martin I'd say add a circulator in addition to your switch. On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 3:43 PM Marcus D Leech

[USRP-users] Re: Reflected power on USRP B200

2021-04-19 Thread Martin Elfvelin via USRP-users
Thank you for your input. Do you suggest adding a circulator to the system or rather replacing the switch with a circulator? Best regards, Martin On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 3:43 PM Marcus D Leech wrote: > A circulator can give you an additional 20dB isolation. > > Putting 5d!m into the RX2 port wi

[USRP-users] Re: Reflected power on USRP B200

2021-04-19 Thread Marcus D Leech
A circulator can give you an additional 20dB isolation. Putting 5d!m into the RX2 port will likely destroy the RX amplifier in the AD9361. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 19, 2021, at 9:12 AM, Martin Elfvelin via USRP-users > wrote: > >  > Hello all, > > I am planning on using a USRP B200 i