On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:34 AM Olo via USRP-users <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
> Thank you for your response and for confirming the general approach to the
> configuration. I have a couple more questions related to RFNoC,
> particularly about buffer size in SEP (Stream Endpoints) and IP
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 7:14 PM Olo via USRP-users <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
> Thank you for your detailed responses to my previous questions. I
> appreciate the information provided about the limitations and potential
> issues related to FFT size and TwinRX configuration.
>
> However,
If you had a polyphase channelizer on the FPGA, that would be an efficient
solution to your problem, but there's no such block as part of UHD itself.
There have been channelizer blocks written in the wild, but that would be
something you'd have to figure out.
--M
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 7:17 AM O
On 27/08/2024 01:16, Olo via USRP-users wrote:
I have an additional question related to my current project involving
RFNoC. Specifically, I need to implement as many narrowband channels
(DDC) as possible to record various parts of the spectrum as required.
I’m wondering if it would be more e
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 10:24 AM Marcus D. Leech
wrote:
> On 26/08/2024 10:21, Rob Kossler via USRP-users wrote:
>
> Hi Olo,
> On one point regarding an FFT length of 8192, there is likely an issue
> with using the Ettus FFT block. In the past (I haven't checked recently),
> this block was limite
On 26/08/2024 11:08, Brian Padalino wrote:
Also note that large signals on one channel will leak into the other
at baseband, I believe. I think it's just the nature of the 2-channel
design using the single ADC and everything being so close.
The datasheet for the ADC shows ca -88dB cross-talk b
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 10:25 AM Marcus D. Leech
wrote:
> On 26/08/2024 07:40, Olo via USRP-users wrote:
>
>
>
>1. *TwinRX Channel Configuration:* Is it feasible to use the second
>channel on the second TwinRX to receive on a static frequency while the
>first channel sweeps, and vice
On 26/08/2024 07:40, Olo via USRP-users wrote:
1. *TwinRX Channel Configuration:* Is it feasible to use the second
channel on the second TwinRX to receive on a static frequency
while the first channel sweeps, and vice versa, can the second
channel on the first TwinRX sweep a portion
On 26/08/2024 10:21, Rob Kossler via USRP-users wrote:
Hi Olo,
On one point regarding an FFT length of 8192, there is likely an issue
with using the Ettus FFT block. In the past (I haven't checked
recently), this block was limited to a maximum FFT size of 1024
because the entire FFT had to fit
Hi Olo,
On one point regarding an FFT length of 8192, there is likely an issue with
using the Ettus FFT block. In the past (I haven't checked recently), this
block was limited to a maximum FFT size of 1024 because the entire FFT had
to fit in one packet where the maximum packet payload was about 20
10 matches
Mail list logo