[USRP-users] Re: Assistance with RFNoC and TwinRX Configuration in Custom FPGA Image

2024-09-02 Thread Martin Braun
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:34 AM Olo via USRP-users < usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > Thank you for your response and for confirming the general approach to the > configuration. I have a couple more questions related to RFNoC, > particularly about buffer size in SEP (Stream Endpoints) and IP

[USRP-users] Re: Assistance with RFNoC and TwinRX Configuration in Custom FPGA Image

2024-08-27 Thread Martin Braun
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 7:14 PM Olo via USRP-users < usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > Thank you for your detailed responses to my previous questions. I > appreciate the information provided about the limitations and potential > issues related to FFT size and TwinRX configuration. > > However,

[USRP-users] Re: Assistance with RFNoC and TwinRX Configuration in Custom FPGA Image

2024-08-27 Thread Martin Braun
If you had a polyphase channelizer on the FPGA, that would be an efficient solution to your problem, but there's no such block as part of UHD itself. There have been channelizer blocks written in the wild, but that would be something you'd have to figure out. --M On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 7:17 AM O

[USRP-users] Re: Assistance with RFNoC and TwinRX Configuration in Custom FPGA Image

2024-08-26 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 27/08/2024 01:16, Olo via USRP-users wrote: I have an additional question related to my current project involving RFNoC. Specifically, I need to implement as many narrowband channels (DDC) as possible to record various parts of the spectrum as required. I’m wondering if it would be more e

[USRP-users] Re: Assistance with RFNoC and TwinRX Configuration in Custom FPGA Image

2024-08-26 Thread Rob Kossler via USRP-users
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 10:24 AM Marcus D. Leech wrote: > On 26/08/2024 10:21, Rob Kossler via USRP-users wrote: > > Hi Olo, > On one point regarding an FFT length of 8192, there is likely an issue > with using the Ettus FFT block. In the past (I haven't checked recently), > this block was limite

[USRP-users] Re: Assistance with RFNoC and TwinRX Configuration in Custom FPGA Image

2024-08-26 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 26/08/2024 11:08, Brian Padalino wrote: Also note that large signals on one channel will leak into the other at baseband, I believe. I think it's just the nature of the 2-channel design using the single ADC and everything being so close. The datasheet for the ADC shows ca -88dB cross-talk b

[USRP-users] Re: Assistance with RFNoC and TwinRX Configuration in Custom FPGA Image

2024-08-26 Thread Brian Padalino
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 10:25 AM Marcus D. Leech wrote: > On 26/08/2024 07:40, Olo via USRP-users wrote: > > > >1. *TwinRX Channel Configuration:* Is it feasible to use the second >channel on the second TwinRX to receive on a static frequency while the >first channel sweeps, and vice

[USRP-users] Re: Assistance with RFNoC and TwinRX Configuration in Custom FPGA Image

2024-08-26 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 26/08/2024 07:40, Olo via USRP-users wrote: 1. *TwinRX Channel Configuration:* Is it feasible to use the second channel on the second TwinRX to receive on a static frequency while the first channel sweeps, and vice versa, can the second channel on the first TwinRX sweep a portion

[USRP-users] Re: Assistance with RFNoC and TwinRX Configuration in Custom FPGA Image

2024-08-26 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 26/08/2024 10:21, Rob Kossler via USRP-users wrote: Hi Olo, On one point regarding an FFT length of 8192, there is likely an issue with using the Ettus FFT block. In the past (I haven't checked recently), this block was limited to a maximum FFT size of 1024 because the entire FFT had to fit

[USRP-users] Re: Assistance with RFNoC and TwinRX Configuration in Custom FPGA Image

2024-08-26 Thread Rob Kossler via USRP-users
Hi Olo, On one point regarding an FFT length of 8192, there is likely an issue with using the Ettus FFT block. In the past (I haven't checked recently), this block was limited to a maximum FFT size of 1024 because the entire FFT had to fit in one packet where the maximum packet payload was about 20