Yes I have defined the Gpio as output in the mask register
From: Nick Foster
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 1:24 PM
To: Chatterjee, Pratik
Cc: Jonathon Pendlum; usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] RFNOC GPIO Remapping
Have you defined that GPIO as
ng is happening.
>
> Thanks,
> Pratik
>
> --
> *From:* Chatterjee, Pratik
> *Sent:* Sunday, February 3, 2019 9:31 PM
> *To:* Jonathon Pendlum
> *Cc:* usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
> *Subject:* Re: [USRP-users] RFNOC GPIO Remapping
>
> Thank you Jonathon for your hel
e I do see the output. Appreciate any
insights as to why such a thing is happening.
Thanks,
Pratik
From: Chatterjee, Pratik
Sent: Sunday, February 3, 2019 9:31 PM
To: Jonathon Pendlum
Cc: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] RFNOC GPIO Remapping
, Pratik
Cc: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] RFNOC GPIO Remapping
Hi Pratik,
That error generally means that the RFNoC block did not response to a command
packet. That happens when the block is not correctly connected to the crossbar
or the clocks are not connected. In this case
Hi Pratik,
That error generally means that the RFNoC block did not response to a
command packet. That happens when the block is not correctly connected to
the crossbar or the clocks are not connected. In this case it is the Radio
Core RFNoC block, which by default is correctly connected unless mod
Hello,
I am using an X310 and I need to monitor a signal out of GPIO from my custom
block. Going through the archives I prefer the option to disconnect the fp_gpio
lines from the radio core to my custom block. So I snapped the fp_gpio lines
going in gpio_attr to a custom module in db_control to
