Dear Marcus D. Leech:
Thank you very much! I will think about this.
Regards,
Kyeong Su Shin
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
> On 11/14/2017 10:31 PM, Kyeong Su Shin wrote:
>
> Dear Marcus D. Leech:
>
> Thank you for the reply.
>
> Is the only advantage of the TwinRX the
On 11/14/2017 10:31 PM, Kyeong Su Shin wrote:
Dear Marcus D. Leech:
Thank you for the reply.
Is the only advantage of the TwinRX the pre-selector filter bank? Or,
can the superheterodyne design of the radio also affect the data
quality in some ways?
A Low-IF superhet design has some advantage
Dear Marcus D. Leech:
Thank you for the reply.
Is the only advantage of the TwinRX the pre-selector filter bank? Or, can
the superheterodyne design of the radio also affect the data quality in
some ways?
We do turn down the gain to get optimal results. (The 'noise figure' that I
mentioned was th
On 11/14/2017 10:00 PM, Kyeong Su Shin via USRP-users wrote:
Hello Everyone:
We are using USRPs for spectrum sensing (on pretty much any
frequencies). Before asking my faculty to order a TwinRX
daughterboard, however, I would like to see if there are any ways to
improve the sensitivity of the
Hello Everyone:
We are using USRPs for spectrum sensing (on pretty much any frequencies).
Before asking my faculty to order a TwinRX daughterboard, however, I would
like to see if there are any ways to improve the sensitivity of the
hardware that we currently own (UBX/SBX/CBX/WBX).
Our USRP + UBX
