changelog (and even the
commit headline) are misleading.
Robert
From: Rob Kossler [mailto:rkoss...@nd.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2020 5:22 PM
To: Pöhlmann, Robert
Cc: Nate Temple; sammywelsc...@gmail.com; usrp-users
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] DOA with N310 or X310+TwinRX
Hi Robert,
Thanks for
), although
> quite some modifications are necessary to gr-ettus to get synchronized
> streams.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Robert
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* USRP-users [mailto:usrp-users-boun...@lists.ettus.com] *On Behalf
> Of *Nate Temple via USRP-users
>
SRP-users [mailto:usrp-users-boun...@lists.ettus.com] On Behalf Of Nate
Temple via USRP-users
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 9:03 PM
To: Sammy Welschen
Cc: usrp-users; Rob Kossler
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] DOA with N310 or X310+TwinRX
Hi Sammy,
>Can I turn it off and come back the next day and
7 AM Robert via USRP-users <
>>> usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> With external LO its 300 MHz – 4 GHz, check footnote [3] from
>>>> https://www.ettus.com/all-products/usrp-n310/. LO has to be supplied
>>>> at twice the carrier freq.
>>>>
>&g
ce the carrier freq.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Currently we use 4 channels. You can find an example how to do the
>>> calibration here: https://github.com/EttusResearch/gr-doa
>>>
>>> gr-doa was written for TwinRX, but can be adapted.
>>>
>>>
>>>
> want to operate in the small sample regime.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* USRP-users [mailto:usrp-users-boun...@lists.ettus.com] *On
>> Behalf Of *Sammy Welschen via USRP-users
>> *Sent:* Monday, January 27, 2020 3:40 PM
>> *To:* usrp-users@list
:* Monday, January 27, 2020 3:40 PM
> *To:* usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
> *Subject:* Re: [USRP-users] DOA with N310 or X310+TwinRX
>
>
>
> Thank you for the information Robert! Isn't it 6 GHz? However, 4 GHz would
> also be sufficient for me.
>
>
>
> How many chann
Behalf Of Sammy
Welschen via USRP-users
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 3:40 PM
To: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] DOA with N310 or X310+TwinRX
Thank you for the information Robert! Isn't it 6 GHz? However, 4 GHz would also
be sufficient for me.
How many channels does
it, which you cannot do with TwinRX.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Robert
>
>
>
> *From:* USRP-users [mailto:usrp-users-boun...@lists.ettus.com] *On Behalf
> Of *Sammy Welschen via USRP-users
> *Sent:* Monday, January 27, 2020 2:19 PM
> *To:* usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
> *
Of Sammy
Welschen via USRP-users
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 2:19 PM
To: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] DOA with N310 or X310+TwinRX
Thank you Marcus! So the N310 would be the way to go? I was unsure since the
TwinRX is recommended for phase coherent applications.
Marcu
Thank you Marcus! So the N310 would be the way to go? I was unsure since
the TwinRX is recommended for phase coherent applications.
Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users schrieb am So.,
26. Jan. 2020, 18:57:
> On 01/25/2020 11:43 AM, Sammy Welschen via USRP-users wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I am plann
On 01/25/2020 11:43 AM, Sammy Welschen via USRP-users wrote:
Dear all,
I am planning a system with 5-10 channels that is capable of DOA
estimation.
Concerning the calibration of the resulting array, would there be a
difference between a system made up of N310 and one made up of X310
with Tw
Dear all,
I am planning a system with 5-10 channels that is capable of DOA
estimation.
Concerning the calibration of the resulting array, would there be a
difference between a system made up of N310 and one made up of X310 with
TwinRX boards? Would there be other important differences that influe
13 matches
Mail list logo
