Or actually it might just be that the usrp_dev->get_rx_bandwidth()
call doesn't return what's really programmed.
Looking at _setup_rates, the var _baseband_bw is setup there.
In case (1) I have rate=N and divfactor=32 (as I mentionned in the
first mail, I force FIR 4x interp here) and _baseband_b
Hi,
> That’s strange, by default the analog filters should be being configured from
> the master_clock_rate to have optimal bandwidth for the master_clock_rate on
> the assumption your signal uses the bulk of that bandwidth.
That's what I would have thought. Maybe I'm just probing it too early
That’s strange, by default the analog filters should be being configured from
the master_clock_rate to have optimal bandwidth for the master_clock_rate on
the assumption your signal uses the bulk of that bandwidth.
UHD version?
> On May 19, 2018, at 2:37 AM, Sylvain Munaut via USRP-users
> wro
Hi,
I'm comparing two cases that, in theory (at least in my understanding
of things), should yield the same result but don't :)
1) I'm sending data to the USRP at sample_rate N with
master_clock_rate N and the ADI has FIR 4x, HB 2x,2x,2x
2) I'm sending data to the USRP at sample_rate N with
mast
