от Marcus D Leech
>:
>
>The FPGA on the B205 is larger and also has the extended industrial
>temperature range. But apart from that they are identical.
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Aug 19, 2020, at 5:17 PM, Vladimir via USRP-users <
>> usrp-users@lists.ettu
Hello!
Is there any performance difference between subjects if we’re going to use
stock fpga firmware? I see that B205mini has twice larger fpga, but does it
really influence perfomance/capabilities and how? Are there any other
differences between them? Is B200mini in some way limited in comp
Hi all,
We are trying to run UHD on Odroid XU4 which has Samsung Exynos 5244 (4xA15
cores @ 2 GHz + 4xA7 cores @ 1.4 GHz with NEON support) and USB 3.0 onboard.
UHD version is 003.010.002. We managed to build it (essentially just having
added compiler flags to enable neon support), and it is ab
acquire all the data that you need
>rx_stream->revc(buff_ptrs, samps_per_buff, md, timeout)
>
>I hope this help you
>
>Da: USRP-users [mailto:usrp-users-boun...@lists.ettus.com] Per conto di
>Vladimir via USRP-users
>Inviato: venerdì 29 settembre 2017 16:53
>A: usrp-use
is used to
>lower the sample rate then the maximum number of samples which can be received
>with STREAM_MODE_NUM_SAMPS_AND_DONE is reduced by the decimation factor.
>
>Regards,
>Derek
>
>On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Vladimir via USRP-users <
>usrp-users@lists.ettus.co
Hello,
Trying to save more than 2 sec trace with X300 at Fsamp = 100MHz, I encounter
some block length limit of 0x0fff = 268.4 MSamps, which means only 2.6 sec
of time. A bit surprised to see this in 64-bit environment... The assertion is
in module rx_vita_core_3000.cpp:
UHD_ASSERT_THROW(s
t;enable the sub module or not.
>
>Kind regards,
>Joshua Sendall
>
>On 25 Sep 2017 6:18 PM, Vladimir via USRP-users < usrp-users@lists.ettus.com >
>wrote:
>>[The e-mail server of the sender could not be verified (SPF Record)]
>> Hello USRP team!
>>
&g
t;Hi Vladimir,
>
>You need to link with libusb. It seems to be needed regardless of whether you
>enable the sub module or not.
>
>Kind regards,
>Joshua Sendall
>
>On 25 Sep 2017 6:18 PM, Vladimir via USRP-users < usrp-users@lists.ettus.com >
>wrote:
>>[The e-
Hello USRP team!
In our Linux application for quite a while we use some 3.10 version of UHD
(which requires FPGA ver. 33) and it works fine. Now we want to use the same
version in Windows app, to match the FPGA ver. But trying to build any of 3.10
versions in MS Visual Studio 2013 (Release x64
