Re: [USRP-users] UHD version that supports older DBSRX on a USRP1.

2020-11-16 Thread Lamar Owen via USRP-users
On 11/16/20 5:26 PM, Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users wrote: On 11/16/2020 03:32 PM, Lamar Owen via USRP-users wrote: [TRACE] [DBSRX] DBSRX: trying ref_clock 400.00 and m_divider 4 [TRACE] [DBSRX] DBSRX R:2 [ERROR] [DBMGR] The daughterboard manager encountered a recoverable error in

Re: [USRP-users] UHD version that supports older DBSRX on a USRP1.

2020-11-16 Thread Lamar Owen via USRP-users
On 11/16/20 3:14 PM, Lamar Owen via USRP-users wrote: So, I'm looking at issue report #304 related to the RFX board, and a related text patch file, https://github.com/EttusResearch/uhd/files/3881213/0001-rfx-Fix-calculation-of-prescaler-and-band-select.patch.txt that seem to have a si

Re: [USRP-users] UHD version that supports older DBSRX on a USRP1.

2020-11-16 Thread Lamar Owen via USRP-users
On 11/16/20 2:20 PM, Lamar Owen via USRP-users wrote: On 11/16/20 1:12 PM, Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users wrote: On 11/16/2020 10:26 AM, Lamar Owen via USRP-users wrote: ... AssertionError: m and ref_clock/m >= 1e6 and ref_clock/m <= 2.5e6   in double dbsrx::set_lo_freq(double)   at

Re: [USRP-users] UHD version that supports older DBSRX on a USRP1.

2020-11-16 Thread Lamar Owen via USRP-users
On 11/16/20 1:12 PM, Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users wrote: On 11/16/2020 10:26 AM, Lamar Owen via USRP-users wrote: ... AssertionError: m and ref_clock/m >= 1e6 and ref_clock/m <= 2.5e6   in double dbsrx::set_lo_freq(double)   at /home/conda/feedstock_root/build_artifacts/uhd_1602712

[USRP-users] UHD version that supports older DBSRX on a USRP1.

2020-11-16 Thread Lamar Owen via USRP-users
System: CentOS 8 using Anaconda3 with the conda-forge GNURadio 3.8.2 and UHD 3.15.0 loaded. USRP: USRP1 with a DBSRX.  Behavior is replicated with the EPEL8 UHD 3.15 packages, run as root. Question: what version of UHD do I need to downgrade to in order for 'ye olde DBSRX' daughterboard to be