Thanks for your time.
I will check out the example.
This is not a buffer problem. I just need 1024 Samples (real+imaginary) for
FFT...
I should be able to get them in a single pass.
You saw my code, not a smoking gun there.
This is probably is a physical problem.
Cable is an SFP fiber dedicated li
On 25/04/2025 23:33, Nikos Balkanas wrote:
Actually MTU is 9000. This is one of the recommendations...
I tried it with MTU 1500. It was worse:(
maxsamples dropped to 364...
Right, 9000, rather than 8000.
Upgrading to 10Gbit wont' give you larger MTU.
What you're trying to do, I think, is to so
Actually MTU is 9000. This is one of the recommendations...
I tried it with MTU 1500. It was worse:(
maxsamples dropped to 364...
[INFO] [UHD] linux; GNU C++ version 13.2.0; Boost_108300;
UHD_4.6.0.0+ds1-5.1ubuntu0.24.04.1
[INFO] [X300] X300 initialization sequence...
[INFO] [X300] Maximum frame s
On 25/04/2025 22:26, Nikos Balkanas wrote:
Thanks Marcus,
for your fast reply.
On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 4:08 AM Marcus D. Leech
wrote:
On 25/04/2025 20:50, Nikos Balkanas wrote:
Hello,
I need to buy a new NIC. What would you suggest?
The one I use is an old Mellanox 10 Gbs,
Thanks Marcus,
for your fast reply.
On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 4:08 AM Marcus D. Leech
wrote:
> On 25/04/2025 20:50, Nikos Balkanas wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I need to buy a new NIC. What would you suggest?
> The one I use is an old Mellanox 10 Gbs, before the Connect-4 series.
> It can only do 1996 S
Hello,
I need to buy a new NIC. What would you suggest?
The one I use is an old Mellanox 10 Gbs, before the Connect-4 series.
It can only do 1996 S/s, need 19960 (10x more) to work with latest uhd.
Using Ubuntu 24.04 and uhd 4.6.0
On a related question. it seems that the streamer doesn't crash an
NI mentions:\
\
”The maximum input power specification of -15 dBm is based off a continuous
acquisition, meaning that -15 dBm is the max average power that the RF frontend
should receive. **It is always recommended to keep the input signal power level
below specification to avoid damaging the de
This was a user error on my part. My QSFP’s were swapped.
My host machine was routing traffic to the correct port, which allowed pings
and SSH to work over the swapped ports. This fooled me into thinking it was
connected correctly initially.
___
US
Hello,
I recently received an X440 and am having trouble with the 100G ethernet
connections.\
\
I'm using UHD 4.8.0, and the CG_400 firmware image.\
\
I'm connected to both 100G ports and the 1G management port. All ports come up
fine and seem to be connected.\
\
I can ping and ssh from my host
I'm sure about file location and reading it in rfnoc_image_builder is
correct. But for test reducing resource when i reduce buffer size in yml
file it had effect. Thanks very much
ep0: # Stream endpoint name
ctrl: True # Endpoint passes control traffic
data: True # Endpoint passes data traffic
buf
10 matches
Mail list logo
