[USRP-users] Re: LO offset with external LO

2025-02-07 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 07/02/2025 16:55, Eugene Grayver wrote: Hi, I am using N310 with external LO.  I still want to use the digital LO offset.  However, it appears that when the LO is set to external the digital LO offset is ignored.  Am I missing something or is this the intended behavior?  UHD 4.6 Eugene

[USRP-users] LO offset with external LO

2025-02-07 Thread Eugene Grayver
Hi, I am using N310 with external LO. I still want to use the digital LO offset. However, it appears that when the LO is set to external the digital LO offset is ignored. Am I missing something or is this the intended behavior? UHD 4.6 Eugene Eugene Grayver, Ph.D. Principal Engineer 310-3

[USRP-users] Re: Error when running Benchmark on USRP X440: RfnocError - OpTimeout

2025-02-07 Thread Chris Rogers
I’d suggest taking a look at this section of the manual https://files.ettus.com/manual/page_usrp_x4xx.html#x440_usage_mcrs and the link Marcus sent https://kb.ettus.com/About_Sampling_Rates_and_Master_Clock_Rates_for_the_USRP_X440. This is a unique USRP architecture that requires some frequency and

[USRP-users] Re: Error when running Benchmark on USRP X440: RfnocError - OpTimeout

2025-02-07 Thread Rilbert Lima via USRP-users
Thank you, Chris. I have updated the FPGA image from the USRP X440 to the X4_200, and upon executing, the sampling rate has been reduced to approximately 5 Msps. Another matter I would like to inquire about is whether it is possible to reduce the analog bandwidth of the signal from 200 MHz to