[USRP-users] Re: Asynchronous IO in RFNOC on x310

2024-11-08 Thread Mark Gannet
Hi Martin, Sorry I called you Marcus earlier, I was probably thinking of Marcus of GNURadio. Two things: 1. Is it safe to assume that packets on the data plane are not buffered. Like if there are 64 samples in the packet, that those 64 samples are the most current 64 samples. For instance, if t

[USRP-users] Re: Replay block use for continuously stream data.

2024-11-08 Thread hui cj
The answer is yes. https://github.com/EttusResearch/uhd/issues/793 Nidhi Panda 于2024年11月8日周五 19:10写道: > Hello all, > > I am using USRP x300 device. I want to receive data continuously store it > on ddr memory and transmit it after variable time delay. I know there will > be constraint on the ma

[USRP-users] Replay block use for continuously stream data.

2024-11-08 Thread Nidhi Panda
Hello all, I am using USRP x300 device. I want to receive data continuously store it on ddr memory and transmit it after variable time delay. I know there will be constraint on the maximum time (because of ddr size) I can wait before starting transmission and I am ok with it. But after a fixed

[USRP-users] Re: Asynchronous IO in RFNOC on x310

2024-11-08 Thread Martin Braun
Hey Mark, that all makes sense, but keep in mind that the DDC comes later in the data path than the radio samples, which means the timestamps are "in the past" with respect to the actual GPIO events. In theory, we don't even guarantee deterministic latency (they could vary by how much in the past

[USRP-users] Re: Asynchronous IO in RFNOC on x310

2024-11-08 Thread Mark Gannet
Hi Marcus, Thank you. You've been very helpful and confirmed my thoughts. Yes it will be important to run the sampling of the GPIO pin at the same rate produced by the DDC. I didn't fully appreciate that the data was packetized which makes this more difficult than I'd thought. Re: your thoughts