[USRP-users] Re: Clarification on Benchmark Rate Testing for USRP X310 with two TwinRX

I understand that each TwinRX daughterboard provides two independently tunable channels, each capable of 80 MHz bandwidth. With two TwinRX daughterboards installed, I should be able to achieve a total of 320 MHz across four channels (4x80 MHz). Could you please confirm if this understanding is

[USRP-users] Re: x310 Not Sending Jumbo Packets (>8000 bytes) as 1 Packet on 10GigE

You might need to make some tweaks to your system. Take a look at the suggestions here: https://kb.ettus.com/USRP_Host_Performance_Tuning_Tips_and_Tricks Wade On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 8:18 PM wrote: > Hi Wade, > > I am now receiving “U” instead of “L”. They don’t come out on the console > that o

[USRP-users] Re: Ettus KB: Missing CE clocks

Thanks for pointing that out! I'll make sure that gets updated. Thanks, Wade On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 12:52 PM Rohde, Zach (US 333G) via USRP-users < usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > Hello, > > > > I noticed in the RFNoC Frequency Asked Questions >

[USRP-users] Ettus KB: Missing CE clocks

Hello, I noticed in the RFNoC Frequency Asked Questions article, that the N300/N310, N32X, X410, and X440 clock tables do not contain the CE clocks that are present in these radios. N300/N310 CE: 266.7

[USRP-users] Re: rfnoc_rx_to_file on X310

This is a shortcoming in the example -- we try and not cover all cases to make the examples not too bloated, but sometimes you have these corner cases. The reason is, the example only tunes the radio block, not the DDC block. In a multi_usrp application, UHD would do that for you (which is what rx

[USRP-users] Re: Clarification on Benchmark Rate Testing for USRP X310 with two TwinRX

On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 8:37 AM Olo via USRP-users < usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > > When I execute the following command: > ./benchmark_rate --args="addr=,second_addr=" > --channels *"0,1,2,3"* --rx_rate *100e6* --duration 30 > > am I testing a combined bandwidth of 4x100 MHz, which totals

[USRP-users] Re: kas and meta-ettus

Hi Dennis, we are using kas 4.0 for development. --M On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 4:10 PM Dario Pennisi wrote: > Hi, > i just realized a new version of meta-ettus using > kirkstone/uhd-4.7/gnuradio 3.10 has been released and wanted to give it a > go but i'm struggling to fund the right version of k

[USRP-users] RFNoC Image Builder

Hi all, As you may have seen from the 4.7-RC1 release announcements, we have a bunch of updates to the RFNoC image builder. I would like to provide some context around those. First, we are not yet ready to ship a new version of RFNoC modtool. With the deprecation of gr-ettus as the way to ship th