Hi Olivia,
I was able to make your flow graph build just beautifully, simply by adding a "new" UHD
USRP Sink and UHD USRP Source block, and manually copying the settings over from the
original blocks, then removing them.
I'll guess it's a problem caused by changes to the USRP Blocks between w
Hi Dario,
you're right, that currently doesn't exist. R&D is aware of that, and from what I hear
through the grapevine, it's something that they want to re-establish functionally (don't
know whether that means "forward-porting" the old tool or writing a new one).
Alas, there's nothing that we
Hello Mark,
I'm afraid there isn't a straightforward way of doing that; can't really think of a way
that would enable that short of inventing another "radio block"-style RFNoC core that
handles these GPIOs as separate channels; and that would be a pretty big endeavour.
Best,
Marcus
On 17.01.
Hi Arnaldo,
On 29.01.24 14:23, Arnaldo Sans wrote:
Are there any details about what the measurement conditions were used to accomplished
both the Rx and Tx measurements... e.g. input power etc.?
Which measurements specifically are you referring to? For most of the RX figures, input
power is th
Hi Jeyakumar,
nice to hear from you again! But: I'm almost certain you didn't mean to send your homework
to a couple hundred people :)
Best regards,
Marcus
On 29.01.24 11:05, Jeyakumar K-[BL.EN.P2VLD22009] via USRP-users wrote:
___
USRP-users
Hi,
I am working with an x310 + the UBX-160 daughter card. Ettus has a couple of
URLs with various block diagrams and plots:
BLOCK DIAGRAM: https://files.ettus.com/schematics/ubx/UBX-160_revE.pdf
and performance measurements (plots: Pwr, OIP2, OIP3 etc.)
PLOTS:
https://files.ettus.c
t = (0:0.01:20)';
step1 = ( t >= 0 );
step2 = ( t >= 2 );
step3 = step1 - step2;
plot(t,[step3])
t = (-1:0.01:1)';
impulse = t==0;
unitstep = t>=0;
ramp = t.*unitstep;
quad = t.^2.*unitstep;
sqwave = 0.81.*square(4*pi*t);
plot(t,[impulse unitstep ramp quad sqwave])t = (0:0.001:2)';
sinw = sin(2
