[USRP-users] Re: X410 device no longer found when using use_dpdk=1

2023-08-07 Thread Piotr Krysik
Hello, For X410 the network adapter which works under DPDK driver control can't be used to control the device (it can't carry RPC calls to MPM daemon working on the device). You need a separate Ethernet connection for mgmt_addr. You can use 1Gbit Ethernet link for that. Best Regards, Piotr K

[USRP-users] Re: Driver for E312

2023-08-07 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 07/08/2023 18:47, Mushtaq A. Syed, Ph.D. via USRP-users wrote: Hi:     Where can I find the driver for the USRP E312? I downloaded and unzipped erllc_uhd_winusb_driver.zip; however, there is no listing for the E312. I see drivers for B100, B200, and B205.     Than

[USRP-users] Driver for E312

2023-08-07 Thread Mushtaq A. Syed, Ph.D. via USRP-users
Hi: Where can I find the driver for the USRP E312? I downloaded and unzipped erllc_uhd_winusb_driver.zip; however, there is no listing for the E312. I see drivers for B100, B200, and B205. Thanks a lot! Cheers, Mushtaq -

[USRP-users] Re: MPM major compat number mismatch even after updating FW to latest on X410

2023-08-07 Thread Wade Fife
I think you checked out the wrong branch. Looking at your [INFO] statement, it says you're using a2a04e31, which is the latest commit on master. 5.2 is also the version you should get from the master branch. The "4.4" hasn't been updated on master yet because it's not released yet. Wade On Fri, A

[USRP-users] X410 device no longer found when using use_dpdk=1

2023-08-07 Thread Victor Levin via USRP-users
Hi all, I am trying to enable DPDK with X410 and found an issue when using “use_dpdk=1”. I am on Ubuntu 22.04, the latest UHD 4.4.0 (commit: 4a77791cf5f7cedc842762be8b2b6775073d8c95) and DPDK 21.11.4. When the X410 is connect to the interface without DPDK, I can find it via uhd_usrp_probe a

[USRP-users] Re: Calibration

2023-08-07 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 07/08/2023 09:41, zhou via USRP-users wrote: Thanks for your quick response, Marcus. On the 2nd question, I mean, when LO is different from the target RF freq, DSP will make up the difference. LO leak will become a spurious signal at DSP freq. Can this LO leak be compensated in USRP? if yes

[USRP-users] Re: Calibration

2023-08-07 Thread zhou via USRP-users
Thanks for your quick response, Marcus. On the 2nd question, I mean, when LO is different from the target RF freq, DSP will make up the difference. LO leak will become a spurious signal at DSP freq. Can this LO leak be compensated in USRP? if yes, how?  Thanks.   On Monday, 7 August 2023 at

[USRP-users] Unsubscribe

2023-08-07 Thread tilla
___ USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com

[USRP-users] Re: Calibration

2023-08-07 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 07/08/2023 04:40, zhou via USRP-users wrote: Hi, I have a question regarding USRP calibration. I am using X310 and UHD 4.4. To save calibration time, the step size is set to be 5MHz and the freq range is [600MHz, 6GHz]. My questions are: 1. will the compensation be made at these discrete fr

[USRP-users] Calibration

2023-08-07 Thread zhou via USRP-users
Hi, I have a question regarding USRP calibration. I am using X310 and UHD 4.4.To save calibration time, the step size is set to be 5MHz and the freq range is [600MHz, 6GHz].My questions are:1. will the compensation be made at these discrete frequencies only, or interpolation will be applied to