Thanks for the reply. Opened an issue on github now.
Jorn
> If it's not too much trouble, can you open an issue on
> https://github.com/EttusResearch/uhd/issues and paste this code there? If
> you don't have github access, I can also do it, but if you do it then you
> get auto-updated when we pu
On 2021-11-25 12:24, ChunChih Lin wrote:
Hi Marcus,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
So, is there any way that I can check?
Quite apart from the PHY negotiated rate, there's the "benchmark_rate" tool:
UHD Benchmark Rate Allowed options:
--help help message
--ar
On 2021-11-25 12:24, ChunChih Lin wrote:
Hi Marcus,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
So, is there any way that I can check?
Many thanks
Chun-Chih Lin
Use ethtool on your host PC to check that the interface has negotiated
10G PHY rates.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 11:02 AM Marcus D. Leech
wrote:
Hi Marcus,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
So, is there any way that I can check?
Many thanks
Chun-Chih Lin
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 11:02 AM Marcus D. Leech
wrote:
> On 2021-11-25 10:54, ChunChih Lin wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have a 10Gb PCIe NIC, Intel X520-DA1, installed on my desktop and
> conn
On 2021-11-25 10:54, ChunChih Lin wrote:
Hi all,
I have a 10Gb PCIe NIC, Intel X520-DA1, installed on my desktop and
connected to sfp+1 port with SFP+ DAC cable.
I'm trying to verify the speed of the connection.
I launched a iperf3 server on USRP N310, and a client from my desktop.
The bandwid
Hi all,
I have a 10Gb PCIe NIC, Intel X520-DA1, installed on my desktop and
connected to sfp+1 port with SFP+ DAC cable.
I'm trying to verify the speed of the connection.
I launched a iperf3 server on USRP N310, and a client from my desktop.
The bandwidth is fat from 10Gb. The screenshot below is
Dustin,
your application design looks like a pretty normal UHD use case. Like
Marcus says, 4 ms might be tough to achieve, but then again, if you're
connected directly to the device and your computer is not also mining
cryptocurrencies at the same time, it's possible. In any case, you'd see
"late
Jørn,
If it's not too much trouble, can you open an issue on
https://github.com/EttusResearch/uhd/issues and paste this code there? If
you don't have github access, I can also do it, but if you do it then you
get auto-updated when we publish updates.
Thanks,
Martin
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 8:58 P
> Emanuele, I think if you use set_time_unknown_pps(0) you can get consistent \
> phase behavior.
This solved our issues. Thank you very much.
Regards
Emanuele Tolomei
___
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an ema
Dear manager:
Please help unsubscribe E-mail list from usrp-users-requ...@lists.ettus.com.
Thank you!
Forwarding messages
From: usrp-users-requ...@lists.ettus.com
Date: 2021-11-25 16:30:18
To: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: USRP-users Digest, Vol 135, Issue 54
Send U
10 matches
Mail list logo
