On 2021-11-22 02:18, Richard Bell wrote:
Hey Marcus,
I would like to be able to use all four channels of each N310 if
desired. In that case it would take 2 SFP+ per N310 as I understand
it. If I only use 1 channel I would require 1 SFP+ port, I understand
your point.
Richard
Ah. I misunder
I forgot to mention, your 1G networking looks correct to me. But, I wanted
to point out that it is optional. In my solution, I only have the SFP+
connections. The N3xx can use that connection for the management ports.
rob
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 10:03 AM Rob Kossler wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> Altho
Hi Richard,
Although you may be able to make it work with a fast switch, it seems it
would be cheaper to just add the 10 SFP+ ports. I am presently running an
8 SFP+ port solution using two Intel X710-DA4 cards. I believe I got these
for about $300 each.
Rob
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 2:19 AM Richa
On 2021-11-22 03:23, Emanuele Tolomei wrote:
Sorry, here is the attached snippet.
Emanuele Tolomei
- Messaggio originale -
Da: "Emanuele Tolomei"
A: "usrp-users"
Cc: "Luigi Venuso" , "gianluca.bafanelli"
Inviato: Lunedì, 22 novembre 2021 9:21:45
Oggetto: Trouble with TwinRX frequenc
Perfect. Thanks for that explanation!
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 7:15 AM Martin Braun wrote:
> ...sorry, fat-fingered Gmail. I was saying, I had to check the code myself
> carefully to see why.
> In the rfnoc_graph constructor, we attempt to synchronize devices, so
> that's the relevant call.
>
>
Hi Gabriel,
we have a fix on the way for this. Many thanks again for reporting this.
Keep your eyes on master branch.
--M
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 8:41 AM Gabriel Lim wrote:
> Am re-posting my issue that I raised on the github here.
>
> Issue Description
>
> X310 with two TwinRX daughterboards,
...sorry, fat-fingered Gmail. I was saying, I had to check the code myself
carefully to see why.
In the rfnoc_graph constructor, we attempt to synchronize devices, so
that's the relevant call.
There's a bit of a catch here: If you are initializing the devices with
internal ref and PPS, and then la
Hey Rob,
thanks for asking -- this function is definitely under-documented. The
short answer is: This function should be called for synchronous operations,
but only on X3x0 will it make any difference if you don't call it.
What does it do? This function provides additional synchronization on top
Sorry, here is the attached snippet.
Emanuele Tolomei
- Messaggio originale -
Da: "Emanuele Tolomei"
A: "usrp-users"
Cc: "Luigi Venuso" , "gianluca.bafanelli"
Inviato: Lunedì, 22 novembre 2021 9:21:45
Oggetto: Trouble with TwinRX frequency tuning
Hello,
I have an X300 with two TwinR
Hello,
I have an X300 with two TwinRX daughterboards, and I'm using UHD 3.13.1. I need
channels synchronization for DOA calculation, so the channels share the same LO
provided by channel 0.
The code for the LO sharing is the following:
m_MultiUsrp->set_time_unknown_pps(uhd::time_spec_t());
std:
10 matches
Mail list logo
