Hey Richard,
Not sure if this is still on your radar, but I'd be curious to see the code
you're using to test this. Do you update your frequency tuning policy to be
DSP tuning only? If you want to pick this back up, feel free to shoot an
email to supp...@ettus.com and we can do a bit of a code wal
Rob,
I'm not sure what the implications would be, but you could try recompiling
UHD with an updated *trace_delay_offset* and/or *offset_error* threshold:
https://github.com/EttusResearch/uhd/blob/UHD-3.15.LTS/mpm/python/usrp_mpm/dboard_manager/mg_init.py#L212
I'm not sure why your custom RFNoC b
Timestamps on RX samples are put in the CHDR Header by the Radio Core and
are not changed by the DDC downstream, except for the case of interpolation
/ decimation. But even in this case, the remaining samples should still be
repackaged with timestamps consistent with those given by the Radio Core.
On 02/06/2020 10:53 AM, voonna santosh via USRP-users wrote:
Hi There,
I would like to connect external GPS antenna to X300 and get the
time once GPS is locked. Can you please throw pointers on following
things:
* Does X300 support specific GPS antennas? If so can you please let
me k
Hi There, I would like to connect external GPS antenna to X300 and get the
time once GPS is locked. Can you please throw pointers on following things:
- Does X300 support specific GPS antennas? If so can you please let me know ?
- How do I know that X300's GPS is locked? Is there any AP
Hello again,
There seemed to have wrong rights on file, because after changing rights and
editing the file I had this error:
[INFO] [UHD] linux; GNU C++ version 7.4.0; Boost_106501;
UHD_3.15.0.HEAD-0-gaea0e2de
EAL: Detected 28 lcore(s)
EAL: No free hugepages reported in hugepages-1048576kB
EAL
Hello,
Sorry if I had better to create an other thread.
I am trying also to reach better stability in OpenAirInterface, and to use USRP
through DPDK.
I face the exact same error, however I don't have /etc/uhd folder :
$ locate uhd.conf
/etc/security/limits.d/uhd.conf
/etc/security/limits.d/uhd.c
an information: using a 10Gb/s SFP+ to RJ45 module, it works.
Thanks for your help.
Olivier
Le 04/02/2020 à 11:20, Marcus Müller a écrit :
> Ah, my bad, I was assuming you had a 10GBase-T SFP+ module. Sorry for
> the confusion.
> On Tue, 2020-02-04 at 09:26 +0100, Olivier Ravard via USRP-users
