Re: [USRP-users] N310 schematics and phase noise

2018-03-24 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 03/24/2018 05:54 PM, Louis Brown via USRP-users wrote: Will the N310 schematics be posted? I’m specifically needing to find out the phase noise of the TCXO and GPSDO. Thanks, Lou There is a phase-noise chart on the product datasheet: https://www.ettus.com/content/files/USRP_N310_Datashe

[USRP-users] N310 schematics and phase noise

2018-03-24 Thread Louis Brown via USRP-users
Will the N310 schematics be posted? I’m specifically needing to find out the phase noise of the TCXO and GPSDO. Thanks, Lou ___ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Re: [USRP-users] RFNoC spp rate limitation

2018-03-24 Thread Nick Foster via USRP-users
Just chiming in to say you aren't crazy -- I've seen similar results in my RFNoC loopback testing. There's a critical spp that you can't go below at full rate without experiencing over/underflows. I didn't take the time to dig down to the bottom of it, so I can't be of too much help here except to

Re: [USRP-users] IQ transmission using grc

2018-03-24 Thread Kyeong Su Shin via USRP-users
Hello Ben: USRP N210 samples at 100MS/s (with an additional 4x interpolation in case of Tx - making it 400MS/s). The maximum effective sampling rate, however, is bottlenecked by the connection between the USRP and the PC. The 1Gbps Ethernet connection can keep up with a 25MS/s 16bit I-Q data s

Re: [USRP-users] RFNoC spp rate limitation

2018-03-24 Thread Sebastian Leutner via USRP-users
I tried using the packet_resizer block which improved things a little bit but not significantly. I figured that as soon as the difference between the spp (coming from the Radio) and the set packet size in the resizer block is too large, I get overruns again. I increased the STR_SINK_FIFOSIZE of