Log4J Vulnerability

2021-12-16 Thread Pastrana, Rodrigo (RIS-BCT)
Is Zeppelin affected by the recently discovered log4j vulnerability? I was not able to find an official announcement. Thanks. The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above.

Re: Log4J Vulnerability

2021-12-16 Thread Jack Park
The pom.xml says log4j is version 1.2.17 which, if I am not mistaken, is the patched version. That's what is in github now - it says nothing (to me) about older versions in use. On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 7:28 AM Pastrana, Rodrigo (RIS-BCT) < rodrigo.pastr...@lexisnexisrisk.com> wrote: > Is Zeppeli

RE: Log4J Vulnerability

2021-12-16 Thread Pastrana, Rodrigo (RIS-BCT)
Thanks Jack, I see that as well, but the concern is it seems that entry was added to the top-level pom 7 years ago, and I thought the recent patch was released in log4-core 2.15 and 2.16 https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.logging.log4j/log4j-core/2.16.0 Has Zeppelin avoided CVE-2021-4

Re: Log4J Vulnerability

2021-12-16 Thread Markus Härnvi
1.2.17 is from the old 1.0 branch and not affected by CVE-2021-44228. Versions 1.* never had the JNDI lookup code. It is only log4j 2 that is vulnerable. Fixed in 2.15 and an enhanced fix in 2.16. /Markus On 16 Dec 2021 at 17:39:44, Jack Park wrote: > The pom.xml says log4j is version 1.2.17 w

RE: Log4J Vulnerability

2021-12-16 Thread Pastrana, Rodrigo (RIS-BCT)
Thanks Markus, that confirms my understanding. Also, I believe log4j1 is at end-of-life and susceptible to other security vulnerabilities which is why I’m looking forward to an official statement from the Zeppelin project. From: Markus Härnvi Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2021 12:23 PM To: users

RE: Log4J Vulnerability

2021-12-16 Thread Pastrana, Rodrigo (RIS-BCT)
FYI found a couple of relevant Jiras: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-5613 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-3527 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-5452 Unfortunately none seem to be active. From: Pastrana, Rodrigo (RIS-BCT) Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2