Hello, users!
I also join to previous question about new release.
It would be good to begin to prepare RC.
Can we make a plan for necessary functionality and bug fixes for further
release?
On 2017-10-24 08:10, Ruslan Dautkhanov mailto:d...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
> Sorry for bringing up a
ss defines how to release source code, but it does not
>> really restrict what kind of 'version' the project should have releases.
>> For example, spark released spark-2.0.0-preview[1] before spark-2.0.0.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> moon
>>
>> [1] http://spark.apac
AFAIK, ETA is by end of July.
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 8:31 PM, mbatista wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's the planned date for 0.8 Release?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-zeppelin-users-
> incubating-mailing-list.75479.x6.nabble.com/Roadmap-for-0-8-
> 0-
Hi,
What's the planned date for 0.8 Release?
Thanks in advance.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-zeppelin-users-incubating-mailing-list.75479.x6.nabble.com/Roadmap-for-0-8-0-tp5243p5828.html
Sent from the Apache Zeppelin Users (incubating) mailing list mailing list
archive at
0 "Home directory
> references (i.e. ~/zeppelin/) in zeppelin-env.sh don't work as expected"
> Less of a critical compared to the above two, but it could complement
> the multi-tenancy feature very well.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Ruslan Dautkhanov
>
> On Wed,
to the above two, but it could complement
> the multi-tenancy feature very well.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Ruslan Dautkhanov
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Felix Cheung
> wrote:
>
> +1 with latest/stable.
>
>
>
>
> --
>
gt;>
>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Felix Cheung > > wrote:
>>
>> +1 with latest/stable.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *From:* moon soo Lee
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 21, 2017 8:41:58 AM
>> *To:* users@zeppe
gt;
> Best regards,
> Ruslan Dautkhanov
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Felix Cheung
> wrote:
>
> +1 with latest/stable.
>
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* moon soo Lee
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 21, 2017 8:41:58 AM
> *To:* users@zeppelin.apache.org
&g
ov
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Felix Cheung
wrote:
> +1 with latest/stable.
>
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* moon soo Lee
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 21, 2017 8:41:58 AM
> *To:* users@zeppelin.apache.org
> *Cc:* d...@zeppelin.apache.org
>
+1 with latest/stable.
From: moon soo Lee
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 8:41:58 AM
To: users@zeppelin.apache.org
Cc: d...@zeppelin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0
And if i suggest simplest way for us to set quality expectation to user, which
will
yes,I think the Admin feature is necessary!
On 2017-03-20 12:03 (+0800), Jongyoul Lee wrote:
> Hi dev & users,
>
> Recently, community submits very new features for Apache Zeppelin. I think
> it's very positive signals to improve Apache Zeppelin and its community.
> But in another aspect, we sh
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:31 PM Jongyoul Lee wrote:
>
> I agree that it will help prolong RC period and use it actually. And also
> we need code freeze for the new features and spend time to stabilize RC.
>
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Felix Cheung
> wrot
s preview or calling it unstable fits with the ASF release process though.
Other projects have code freeze, RC (and longer RC iteration time) etc. - do we think those will help improve quality when the release is finally cut?
_
From: Jianfeng (Jeff) Z
or calling it unstable fits with the
> ASF release process though.
>
> Other projects have code freeze, RC (and longer RC iteration time) etc. -
> do we think those will help improve quality when the release is finally cut?
>
>
> _
> From: Jianfeng (
Other projects have code freeze, RC (and longer RC iteration time) etc. -
> do we think those will help improve quality when the release is finally cut?
>
>
> _
> From: Jianfeng (Jeff) Zhang
> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 6:13 PM
> Subject: Re:
(Jeff) Zhang
> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 6:13 PM
> Subject: Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0
> To: , dev
>
>
>
> Strongly +1 for adding system test for different interpreter modes and
> focus on bug fixing than new features. I do heard from some users complain
> about the bugs of
y cut?
_
From: Jianfeng (Jeff) Zhang
mailto:jzh...@hortonworks.com>>
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0
To: mailto:users@zeppelin.apache.org>>, dev
mailto:d...@zeppelin.apache.org>>
Strongly +1 for adding system test fo
o:users@zeppelin.apache.org>>, dev
mailto:d...@zeppelin.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0
Great to see discussion for 0.8.0.
List of features for 0.8.0 looks really good.
Interpreter factory refactoring
Interpreter layer supports various behavior depends on combination of
PerNote,
t; There are several pending visualization improvements/PRs that would be
> very good to get them in as well.
>
>
> --
> *From:* Jongyoul Lee
> *Sent:* Sunday, March 19, 2017 9:03:24 PM
> *To:* dev; users@zeppelin.apache.org
> *Subject:* Roadmap for 0.8.0
>
> Hi
There are several pending visualization improvements/PRs that would be very
good to get them in as well.
From: Jongyoul Lee
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 9:03:24 PM
To: dev; users@zeppelin.apache.org
Subject: Roadmap for 0.8.0
Hi dev & users,
Rece
Yeah, make sense.
Jongyoul Lee 于2017年3月20日周一 下午7:21写道：
> Thanks for letting me know. I agree almost things we should develop.
> Personally, concerning refactoring it, I'm doing a bit with several PRs but
> we need to restructure InterpreterFactory. At first, list up all issues and
> make some gr
Thanks for letting me know. I agree almost things we should develop.
Personally, concerning refactoring it, I'm doing a bit with several PRs but
we need to restructure InterpreterFactory. At first, list up all issues and
make some groups and handle it. How do you think?
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 2:1
Here's some candidates for 0.8 IMO
- Restructing InterpreterFacotry
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2056Although it is
refactoring ticket, I feel it is pretty important thing to do. As I see
many bugs are due to interpreter factory component, and I do feel it needs
Hi dev & users,
Recently, community submits very new features for Apache Zeppelin. I think
it's very positive signals to improve Apache Zeppelin and its community.
But in another aspect, we should focus on what the next release includes. I
think we need to summarize and prioritize them. Here is wh
24 matches
Mail list logo
