RE: Log4J Vulnerability

2021-12-16 Thread Pastrana, Rodrigo (RIS-BCT)
, 2021 12:46 PM To: users@zeppelin.apache.org Cc: dev Subject: RE: Log4J Vulnerability Thanks Markus, that confirms my understanding. Also, I believe log4j1 is at end-of-life and susceptible to other security vulnerabilities which is why I’m looking forward to an official statement from the

RE: Log4J Vulnerability

2021-12-16 Thread Pastrana, Rodrigo (RIS-BCT)
: users@zeppelin.apache.org Cc: dev Subject: Re: Log4J Vulnerability *** External email: use caution *** 1.2.17 is from the old 1.0 branch and not affected by CVE-2021-44228. Versions 1.* never had the JNDI lookup code. It is only log4j 2 that is vulnerable. Fixed in 2.15 and an enhanced fix in

Re: Log4J Vulnerability

2021-12-16 Thread Markus Härnvi
gt;> Is Zeppelin affected by the recently discovered log4j vulnerability? >> >> >> >> I was not able to find an official announcement. Thanks. >> >> -- >> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the

RE: Log4J Vulnerability

2021-12-16 Thread Pastrana, Rodrigo (RIS-BCT)
-44228 by virtue of targeting the older End of life log4j1? If so, is there a plan to patch? Otherwise, is there an official announcement? From: Jack Park Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2021 11:40 AM To: users@zeppelin.apache.org Cc: dev Subject: Re: Log4J Vulnerability *** External email: use

Re: Log4J Vulnerability

2021-12-16 Thread Jack Park
rote: > Is Zeppelin affected by the recently discovered log4j vulnerability? > > > > I was not able to find an official announcement. Thanks. > > -- > The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the > personal and confidenti

Log4J Vulnerability

2021-12-16 Thread Pastrana, Rodrigo (RIS-BCT)
Is Zeppelin affected by the recently discovered log4j vulnerability? I was not able to find an official announcement. Thanks. The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above