Re: [DISCUSS] Roadmap 0.9 and future(Internet mail)

2019-09-19 Thread lewinma(lewinma)
I updated the version of Zeppelin in my environment and post a JIRA tickect as below: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-4332# Any help would be very grateful. Thank you. On Sep 20, 2019, at 10:49 AM, Jeff Zhang mailto:zjf...@gmail.com>> wrote: yes, that's right, please attach the l

Re: [DISCUSS] Roadmap 0.9 and future(Internet mail)

2019-09-19 Thread Jeff Zhang
yes, that's right, please attach the logs if this doesn't work for you. lewinma(lewinma) 于2019年9月18日周三 上午11:44写道: > Sounds great, are there any doc about that? > If only config the Flink job manager’s ip and port is enough. > Thanks a lot. > > On Sep 18, 2019, at 11:39 AM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Roadmap 0.9 and future(Internet mail)

2019-09-18 Thread lewinma(lewinma)
I start a zeppelin daemon on a bare metal node, and want to build a connection to the flink cluster started on K8s. After setting job manager node ip and port. I just got the error below, could any one help me about that? Thanks a lot. text: org.apache.flink.api.scala.DataSet[String] = org.apach

Re: [DISCUSS] Roadmap 0.9 and future(Internet mail)

2019-09-17 Thread lewinma(lewinma)
Sounds great, are there any doc about that? If only config the Flink job manager’s ip and port is enough. Thanks a lot. On Sep 18, 2019, at 11:39 AM, Jeff Zhang mailto:zjf...@gmail.com>> wrote: I think it is already supported. The flink interpreter will still run out of k8s, but the flink clust

Re: [DISCUSS] Roadmap 0.9 and future(Internet mail)

2019-09-17 Thread Jeff Zhang
I think it is already supported. The flink interpreter will still run out of k8s, but the flink cluster runs in k8s, then as long as configure flink interpreter properly, you can connect the flink cluster in k8s lewinma(lewinma) 于2019年9月18日周三 上午10:38写道: > Do we have a plan of supporting Flink ru

Re: [DISCUSS] Roadmap 0.9 and future(Internet mail)

2019-09-17 Thread lewinma(lewinma)
Do we have a plan of supporting Flink running on K8s? Best Regards~ Lewinma On Sep 17, 2019, at 9:32 PM, Jeff Zhang mailto:zjf...@gmail.com>> wrote: Maybe in next Month (Sep) mahmoud.khaled mailto:mahmoud.kha...@incorta.com>> 于2019年9月17日周二 下午7:21写道: Hi, What's the planned date for 0.9 Relea

Re: [DISCUSS] Roadmap 0.9 and future

2019-09-17 Thread Jeff Zhang
Maybe in next Month (Sep) mahmoud.khaled 于2019年9月17日周二 下午7:21写道: > Hi, > > What's the planned date for 0.9 Release? > > Thanks in advance. > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://apache-zeppelin-users-incubating-mailing-list.75479.x6.nabble.com/ > -- Best Regards Jeff Zhang

Re: [DISCUSS] Roadmap 0.9 and future

2019-09-17 Thread mahmoud.khaled
Hi, What's the planned date for 0.9 Release? Thanks in advance. -- Sent from: http://apache-zeppelin-users-incubating-mailing-list.75479.x6.nabble.com/

Re: [DISCUSS] Roadmap 0.9 and future

2018-03-13 Thread Ruslan Dautkhanov
Thanks for sharing this moon ! Those are great ideas. -- Ruslan Dautkhanov On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 11:21 AM, moon soo Lee wrote: > Hi forks, > > There were an offline meeting yesterday at PaloAlto with contributors and > users. We've shared idea about current state of project and future proj

RE: [DISCUSS] Roadmap 0.9 and future

2018-03-13 Thread Belousov Maksim Eduardovich
Regards, Maksim Belousov From: Jongyoul Lee [mailto:jongy...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2018 3:10 AM To: users Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Roadmap 0.9 and future Thanks for the sharing. As an enterprise user, it would help a lot to support Spark more concretely. And containerization b

RE: [DISCUSS] Roadmap 0.9 and future

2018-03-08 Thread Partridge, Lucas (GE Aviation)
. From: moon soo Lee [mailto:m...@apache.org] Sent: 07 March 2018 18:22 To: users@zeppelin.apache.org Subject: EXT: [DISCUSS] Roadmap 0.9 and future Hi forks, There were an offline meeting yesterday at PaloAlto with contributors and users. We've shared idea about current state of projec

Re: [DISCUSS] Roadmap 0.9 and future

2018-03-07 Thread Jongyoul Lee
Thanks for the sharing. As an enterprise user, it would help a lot to support Spark more concretely. And containerization became a default option to operate a framework. For provide immediate release of Spark, I suggest separate release cycle between zeppelin-* module and interpreters. This would

Re: [DISCUSS] Roadmap 0.9 and future

2018-03-07 Thread moon soo Lee
I think there were couple of discussions about 0.8.0 release in the community. We have umbrella issue that tracks 0.8.0 release [1]. And i see not many blockers are left. Jeff volunteered the release manager for 0.8.0 and I think he can give better idea of 0.8.0 release estimate. Thanks, moon [1]

[DISCUSS] Roadmap 0.9 and future

2018-03-07 Thread Paul Brenner
Thanks for sharing the results of the meeting! Regarding the point "Need more frequent release”, was there any discussion around when 0.8.0 will be officially released? I remember a message a few months ago suggesting that it might be soon. ( http://www.placeiq.com/ ) ( http://www.placeiq.com/

[DISCUSS] Roadmap 0.9 and future

2018-03-07 Thread moon soo Lee
Hi forks, There were an offline meeting yesterday at PaloAlto with contributors and users. We've shared idea about current state of project and future project roadmap and wishlists (meeting note [1]). It was really inspiring and exciting time. Let me try summarize, move this discussion to online.