Re: Inefficient third party JS library integration, e.g. plotly

Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-5019 Expect a PR soon for that. On 2020/08/26 15:48:23, Jeff Zhang wrote: > Adding custom js via configuration make sense to me. > > Andreas Weise 于2020年8月26日周三 下午8:37写道： > > > Bumping this one up again (after 2 yea

Re: Inefficient third party JS library integration, e.g. plotly

Bumping this one up again (after 2 years of silence), as its still not possible to efficiently integrate plotly for multiple paragraphs in zeppelin. WDYT about my suggestion. I can prepare a PR for that... > Therefore I'm again suggesting a new configuration property to allow zeppelin > admini

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 0.8.2

+1. Would you mind getting ZEPPELIN-4299 merged to branch-0.8? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-4299 PR already open https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3423 The issue is pretty annoying for the end user experience. Best regards Andreas On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 8:18 PM Miquel

Re: [DISCUSS] ZEPPELIN-2619. Save note in [Title].zpln instead of [NOTEID]/note.json

Somehow subject was deleted in earlier mail. So here again for adding my thoughts to the proper thread: Sure, there might exist some kind of naming policy (or let's better call it naming convention) in zeppelin multiuser environments. But as long as there is no way to technically enforce a cert

[no subject]

Sure, there might exist some kind of naming policy (or let's better call it naming convention) in zeppelin multiuser environments. But as long as there is no way to technically enforce a certain naming convention to turn it into a naming policy (which would be a nice idea BTW), it's IMHO a vague

Re: [DISCUSS] ZEPPELIN-2619. Save note in [Title].zpln instead of [NOTEID]/note.json

another reason for keeping noteId is uniqueness in case of multi-user environments. In that case users have separate zeppelin workspaces, which is something we are using in production: see ZEPPELIN_NOTEBOOK_PUBLIC=false in the doc [1]. In that case users might be very confused when they can not

Re: Inefficient third party JS library integration, e.g. plotly

Thanks for your answers, but as long as custom JS code resides in html->body (which is the case for any code loaded through notebooks) there is no guarenteed loading sequence when using the default HTML outputs of libs like plotly, which assume that all of the library code is already loaded.

Inefficient third party JS library integration, e.g. plotly

We are using plotly for charts quite often (plotly python in conjunction with pyspark) and it reavels a weakness regarding to third party JS library integration. Unfortunately current plotly integration is not very efficient in terms of library integration, which leads to huge notebooks. This i

Re: Starting to Prepare 0.8.0 RC1

We run into a non-deterministic issue related to new TimeoutLifecycle Feature https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-3435 On 2018/04/27 12:51:26, Jeff Zhang wrote: > Thanks Jongyoul. I will hold it until it is fixed, seems it is a quick fix. > > > > Jongyoul Lee 于2018年4月27日周五 上午11:57

Re: "IPython is available, use IPython for PySparkInterpreter"

I already filed an issue: Checkout https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-3290 Jeff Zhang wanted to wait for other users feedback there. On 2018/03/19 18:10:48, Ruslan Dautkhanov wrote: > We're getting " IPython is available, use IPython for PySparkInterpreter " > warning each time we

Notebook not running via REST API after Zeppelin Restart: Already known issue in master branch?

Hi, I came across issues when using the Notebook Rest API. The run operations simply do not work after after fresh restarts of zeppelin. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-3105 Is this a known issue in latest master branch? Cheers Andreas

Subject: Re: Zeppelin %dev Interpreter

message -- > From: moon soo Lee > To: users@zeppelin.apache.org > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 01:31:52 + > Subject: Re: Zeppelin %dev Interpreter > Have you tried add -Phelium-dev profile in your maven build command? > > Thanks, > moon > > On

Zeppelin %dev Interpreter

Hi, various documentations describe the usage of %dev interpreter, e.g. when developing Helium Applications. https://zeppelin.apache.org/docs/0.7.0/development/writingzeppelinapplication.html I'm wondering how the %dev Interpreter gets added to zeppelin a server. I already tried starting zeppeli

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.7.0 (RC3)

As there seems to be RC4, any chance to also get PR 1804 [1] merged for 0.7.0. It fixes an important issue [2] when customizing the zeppelin start page. Without the bugfix, it is not possible to use a custom homepage which includes the notebook list. Thanks. Andreas [1] https://github.com/apache

zeppelin front-end extensibility

Hi, This is about the UI extensibility of zeppelin. I've read the Helium Proposal [1] and looked at the referenced helium examples in github. As far as I see, helium is an notebook centric approach - which means that only notebook functionality can be used. Right now it seems very hard to extend