Re: [DISCUSS] Is interpreter binding necessary ?

Thank you Jeff for summarizing it. Please file an issue to discuss how to migrate features. On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > > Yes, it is covered, you can choose default interpreter group (with > different configuration of max number of cores, or yarn queue) in note > page

Re: [DISCUSS] Is interpreter binding necessary ?

Yes, it is covered, you can choose default interpreter group (with different configuration of max number of cores, or yarn queue) in note page. But you still need to specify %pyspark at the beginning of paragraph to tell zeppelin that you want to use python otherwise zeppelin will treat it as scala

Re: [DISCUSS] Is interpreter binding necessary ?

For 2a, just making sure I understand and see if it covers our use case: we have multiple spark interpeters that we want to be able to set as default. They could all be pyspark, but differ by the configuration of max number of cores, or yarn queue. Is the plan to still allow for setting these di

Re: [DISCUSS] Is interpreter binding necessary ?

Thanks everyone. Let me summarize it. 1. I think no one object to remove the binding info in zeppelin server side (interpreter.json), this would reduce the maintenance effect in zeppelin server. 2. We need to keep 2 ability if we remove the interpreter binding. a. Set the default interprete

Re: Connecting from Zeppelin 0.7.3 to Oracle 12c semds Spark 2.3.0 is not supported

sure thanks I sorted it out. regards, Dr Mich Talebzadeh LinkedIn * https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=AAEWh2gBxianrbJd6zP6AcPCCdOABUrV8Pw * http://talebzadehmich.wordpress.com *Disclaimer:* Use i