Re: [DISCUSS] Release package size

2017-01-20 Thread Mina Lee
Decision making taking more time than I expected and I think this shouldn't be blocker for 0.7.0. We can take more time deciding which interpreters can be included or excluded. Until then, I am just going to go with our current one: zeppelin-bin-all, zeppelin-bin-netinst. Moon's suggestion looks

Re: InvalidClassException using Zeppelin (master) and spark-2.1 on a standalone spark cluster

2017-01-20 Thread Jonathan Kelly
Hi, Antoine, this issue was being tracked in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1977, but it is now resolved as of yesterday (looks like about 18 hours ago). Maybe you need to pull from master again and rebuild? ~ Jonathan On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:19 PM Antoine wrote: > Hei, > > I'

InvalidClassException using Zeppelin (master) and spark-2.1 on a standalone spark cluster

2017-01-20 Thread Antoine
Hei, I'm trying to use Zeppelin from the master git branch with spark-2.1 and I get an invalid class exeption when I use a standalone spark cluster. java.io.InvalidClassException: org.apache.commons.lang3.time.FastDateParser; local class incompatible: stream classdesc serialVersionUID = 2, local

Re: [Discuss] Move some interpreters out of zeppelin project

2017-01-20 Thread moon soo Lee
Thanks Jeff for staring the thread. Here's my thoughts 1. Do we need to do this yes. 2. If the answer is yes, which interpreters should be moved out If Zeppelin community has no problem maintaining certain interpreter, then no reason to remove contribution from community. However, if Zeppelin com

Re: [Discuss] Move some interpreters out of zeppelin project

2017-01-20 Thread Jongyoul Lee
Hi Jeff, Thanks for starting this issue. It increases flexibility of improving interpreters itself but it can also decreases stability of interpreters. I'm worried about this side-effect. As you mentioned, it's hard for me to review new interpreter that I didn't use but it couldn't be a reason wh

[Discuss] Move some interpreters out of zeppelin project

2017-01-20 Thread Jeff Zhang
As we talk in another thread [1] about moving some interpreters out of zeppelin project. I open this thread to discuss it in more details. I'd like to raise 4 questions for this. 1. Do we need to do this 2. If the answer is yes, which interpreters should be moved out 3. How do we integrate these i

Re: [DISCUSS] Release package size

2017-01-20 Thread moon soo Lee
Hi, I think we need to have some policy to decide which interpreter goes into zeppelin-bin-min package. And make applying that policy as a part of release process. Because i can not see any consistent rule except for "it seems" or "i guess". And i have no idea how i can explain if somebody ask 'wh