Since switching to 3.1.3 I've been seeing the following errors in my logs
when starting trafficserver:
[Apr 26 23:57:01.823] Manager {0x7f49fd072700} NOTE: [newUNIXsocket]
Unable to chmod unix-domain socket: Operation not permitted
[Apr 26 23:57:01.823] Manager {0x7f49fd072700} NOTE: [WebIntrMain]
On 3/22/12 9:50 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like for us to make a page with a list of who's using Apache Traffic
Server. It won't have to include any details, even something simple as
just showing the logos for the companies using our project would be very
helpful. If you'd be willin
On 5/11/12 10:03 AM, mav.p...@holidaylettings.co.uk wrote:
When is the who is using ATS page going live?
I was hoping to get it out with 3.2, maybe someone with elite Markdown
skills wants to work on it ?
-- Leif
When is the who is using ATS page going live?
On 11/05/2012 17:00, "Leif Hedstrom" wrote:
>On 5/11/12 9:25 AM, Gleidson Antonio Henriques wrote:
>> We have a huge forward proxy setup here.
>> We are changing 10 Squid forward proxies into 1 ATS forward proxy.
>> Our ATS proxy throughput is nea
On 5/11/12 9:25 AM, Gleidson Antonio Henriques wrote:
We have a huge forward proxy setup here.
We are changing 10 Squid forward proxies into 1 ATS forward proxy.
Our ATS proxy throughput is nearly 1Gbit/s, limited by network card ( we
will upgrade to 10GB soon ).
All i know is: ATS software ro
We have a huge forward proxy setup here.
We are changing 10 Squid forward proxies into 1 ATS forward proxy.
Our ATS proxy throughput is nearly 1Gbit/s, limited by network card ( we
will upgrade to 10GB soon ).
All i know is: ATS software rocks !
Thank you guys...
-
On 05/09/2012 10:18 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> Can we put Comcast as a user on our "who's using ATS" page (which is
> still in development, i'll get it out soon ...)?
Yes. It's still in a trial only, but I'm fairly confident we'll get
beyond trial status.
Rgds,
JvD
