Tomcat Clustering Support - Without any load balancer like component in the front

Guys, Pretty basic question, given this is my time experience on clustering where i am trying to use tomcat 6 clustering support. So basically i wanted to know if enabling the tomcat 6 clustering would be of any use without having a load-balancer in the front (something like mod_jk) ? well my un

Re: Tomcat Clustering Support - Without any load balancer like component in the front

t; You need something to handle failover. Otherwise there is not a huge > amount > of point. Either a load balancer or mod-jk will do the job. > > On Nov 27, 2007 4:13 PM, mfs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> Guys, >> >> Pretty basic question, given t

Session not being replicated - DeltaManager

Guys, I have setup a cluster where i have two tomcat instances (one on windows and the other on linux), the two instances are able to detect each other and form a cluster. On top of them i have apache/mod_jk as a load-balancer which has been set NOT to use sticky-sessions, since i want to test my

Re: Session not being replicated - DeltaManager

Mistakenly put the wrong worker.properties in my last post where the "worker.lbworker.sticky_session=false" was commented which is not the case Farhan. mfs wrote: > > Guys, > > I have setup a cluster where i have two tomcat instances (one on windows > and the

Session Replication not working ?

Guys, I have setup a cluster where i have two tomcat instances (one on windows and the other on linux), the two instances are able to detect each other and form a cluster. On top of them i have apache/mod_jk as a load-balancer which has sticky-sessions set to FALSE...I am trying to test this setu

When cookies are disabled by the browser ?

Guys, I have got my web app deployed on the tomcat 6.0.13, I wonder what configuration do i have to do so as to make tomcat (built-in http server) handles the scenario where a user has disabled the cookies on the browser ? though that wouldnt be the case for most of the users but still if that is

Cookie-less session tracking - whats are the downsides

Guys, I would want to know the downsides to using cookie-less sessions ? I want to give my client the freedom to disable cookies on the browser if he chooses to, but i would want to know the implications to that ? Some say, exposing your sessionId in the url exposes it to hackers who can spoof t

jsessionId - is there a way to generate/set in the container

Guys, Might not be the question for this list, but still to thought to check. Is there a way i can provide the unique sessionID to the servlet api/container, instead of it generating its own (whenever a new HttpSession is created). Actually we have our own session tracking framework, and now tha

Re: jsessionId - is there a way to generate/set in the container

session managers of each and provide my own, and i am getting a stomach ache by just thinking about it. Farhan. markt-2 wrote: > > mfs wrote: >> Given the above context, i was wondering if there is some way i can >> provide >> my own unique sessionId to the servlet contain

Re: jsessionId - is there a way to generate/set in the container

per and how did it help inter-op.. Thanks Christopher Schultz-2 wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Farhan, > > mfs wrote: > | Actually we have our own session tracking framework, and now > | that i am making a seperate servlet based applica

custom timeout/expiry implementation

Guys, Guys Actually i need to provide my own session timeOut/expiry implementation and i was wondering what would be the easiest way to achieve this, i am using tomcat for development but oc4j for production, and i was wondering if somehow i can hook in my implementation into various servlet con

Re: custom timeout/expiry implementation

needs. Something like HttpSessionListener.preSessionDestroyed() is what i need..I wonder why cant they give such control.. Christopher Schultz-2 wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Farhan, > > mfs wrote: > | Actually i need to provide