Christopher,
I have changed in server.xml. Below is the server.xml part -
WEB-INF/web.xml
As indicated above, I write JSESSIONID in "mycookie" cookie. Even after
restart, the JSESSIONID is not getting invalidated. Befo
On Mar 9, 2014, at 11:05 AM, Neven Cvetkovic wrote:
> Ahmed,
>
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Ahmed Dalatony
> wrote:
>
>> hello,
>>
> can you help me little more with example or simpler doc
>> i'm new to tomcat config
>> and i don't understand virtual host
>>
>> thank you
>>
>
> Ultim
> -Original Message-
> From: Ahmed Dalatony [mailto:ahmed.dalat...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2014 2:16 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: simple way to access application in multi instance
> envirnoment
>
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Neven Cvetkovic
> wrote:
>
> > O
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
> On Mar 9, 2014, at 11:05 AM, Neven Cvetkovic
> wrote:
> > Thus, if you run multiple instances of Tomcat - alone, virtual hosting
> will
> > not help you , since only one process can bind to a single IP address to
> > one port (e.g. port 80)
> -Original Message-
> From: Leo Donahue [mailto:donahu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 9:44 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: The Service Component
>
> Who uses more than one Service in their server.xml and why? I get that
> you can have multiple Connectors if you
> -Original Message-
> From: Leo Donahue [mailto:donahu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 11:10 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Tomcat7w.exe
>
> Did I miss something in the documentation about renaming this if one is
> running multiple windows services of Tomcat?
>
(Tomcat 7.0.50, Linux)
Having recently enabled CORS support for our Tomcat-based web app
using the provided CorsFilter, we have discovered a problem where some
same-origin (i.e. non-CORS) requests from certain browsers (e.g.
Chrome) are denied. This is due to the browser setting the Origin
header
On 10/03/2014 14:30, Richard Hart wrote:
> (Tomcat 7.0.50, Linux)
>
> Having recently enabled CORS support for our Tomcat-based web app
> using the provided CorsFilter, we have discovered a problem where some
> same-origin (i.e. non-CORS) requests from certain browsers (e.g.
> Chrome) are denied.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Jeffrey,
On 3/10/14, 10:26 AM, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
>> -Original Message- From: Leo Donahue
>> [mailto:donahu...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 9:44
>> AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: The Service Component
>>
>> Who uses m
Thanks for your reply. So are the open HTTP connections that use my web
application code waiting in line to be processed by the available threads
specified in maxThreads?
Best,
John
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> 2014-03-09 2:08 GMT+04:00 John Smith :
> > Sorry, fo
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 10:15 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: The Service Component
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Jeffrey,
>
> On 3/10/14, 10:26 AM, Jeffrey
> -Original Message-
> From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 2:59 PM
> To: d...@tomcat.apache.org; users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: ApacheCon North America, Denver, April 7-11
>
> Hello Tomcat enthusiasts,
>
> as you are no doubt aware, ApacheCon N
How dumb am I being by not using an Executor with a named thread pool?
Currently I just have a Connector in server.xml:
Assuming ~2000 simultaneous connections. Tomcat 7.0.42. RHEL6.
Best,
John
On Mar 10, 2014, at 10:40 AM, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 2:59 PM
>> To: d...@tomcat.apache.org; users@tomcat.apache.org
>> Subject: ApacheCon North America, Denver, April 7-11
>>
>> Hello To
> From: John Smith [mailto:tomcat.ran...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: NIO connector - connections and threads
Don't top post.
> So are the open HTTP connections that use my web application code waiting
> in line to be processed by the available threads specified in maxThreads?
The connections won
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Caldarale, Charles R <
chuck.caldar...@unisys.com> wrote:
> > From: John Smith [mailto:tomcat.ran...@gmail.com]
> > Subject: Re: NIO connector - connections and threads
>
> Don't top post.
>
> > So are the open HTTP connections that use my web application code wai
> From: John Smith [mailto:tomcat.ran...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: NIO connector - connections and threads
> If you're implying are 200 people simultaneously, hitting the same page at
> the same time, or making the same HTTP POST at the same time, the answer
> is, yes, probably.
Collecting some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Nick,
On 3/10/14, 11:43 AM, Nick Williams wrote:
>
> On Mar 10, 2014, at 10:40 AM, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
>
>>> -Original Message- From: Rich Bowen
>>> [mailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 2:59
>>> PM To: d...@tomcat.ap
> From: John Smith [mailto:tomcat.ran...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Executor thread pool
> How dumb am I being by not using an Executor with a named thread pool?
> Currently I just have a Connector in server.xml:
> connectionTimeout="2"
>redirectPort="8443"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
John,
On 3/10/14, 11:43 AM, John Smith wrote:
> How dumb am I being by not using an Executor with a named thread
> pool? Currently I just have a Connector in server.xml:
>
> protocol="org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol"
> connectionTimeou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Konstantin,
On 3/5/14, 5:35 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2014-03-06 1:40 GMT+04:00 Christopher Schultz
> :
>>
>> On 3/5/14, 4:20 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> For some reason, I'm not able to access my Tomcat's JMX beans
>>>
>
>
> Collecting some peak usage data might be interesting. You definitely want
> your max thread limit to be a bit above the number of concurrent requests
> you're handling. Of course, that has to be balanced against limits on
> other resources, such as memory and data base connections.
>
> - C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/03/2014 16:27, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Okay. Someone should tell Tomcat that it has been removed.
+1. I guess you are volunteering :)
> This exception is being thrown when I call "jmxproxy?qry" and let
> it list everything available via J
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
All,
I have two instances of Tomcat 8 running locally. One of them happens
to have a JNDI DataSource configured and the other does not. They are
both out-of-the-box 8.0.3 installations.
One of them has no problem connecting via jconsole to observe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 3/10/14, 12:31 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 10/03/2014 16:27, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>
>> Okay. Someone should tell Tomcat that it has been removed.
>
> +1. I guess you are volunteering :)
Actually, yes. I just didn't want to break so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
All,
I stopped Tomcat, completely removed my web application, restarted
Tomcat and I can connect without a problem.
AFAIK, my application isn't doing anything with JMX.
I'll try using my context.xml without any actual code involved.
- -chris
On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
All,
On 3/10/14, 12:52 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> I stopped Tomcat, completely removed my web application, restarted
> Tomcat and I can connect without a problem.
>
> AFAIK, my application isn't doing anything with JMX.
>
> I'll try using m
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Jeffrey,
On 3/10/14, 10:26 AM, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
-Original Message- From: Leo Donahue
[mailto:donahu...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 9:44
AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: The Service Compon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
All,
On 3/10/14, 12:58 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> All,
>
> On 3/10/14, 12:52 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> I stopped Tomcat, completely removed my web application,
>> restarted Tomcat and I can connect without a problem.
>
>> AFAIK, my a
On Mar 10, 2014, at 11:17 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Nick,
>
> On 3/10/14, 11:43 AM, Nick Williams wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 10, 2014, at 10:40 AM, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
>>
-Original Message- From: Rich Bowen
[mailto:rbo.
On 10/03/2014 17:28, Nick Williams wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2014, at 11:17 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Specifically, there is an Apache Tomcat summit on Friday the 11th. We
>> hope to see as many of you there as can make it.
>>
>> Did anyone mention that there is a ton of free beer at ApacheCon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
All,
On 3/10/14, 1:20 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> All,
>
> On 3/10/14, 12:58 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> All,
>
>> On 3/10/14, 12:52 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> I stopped Tomcat, completely removed my web application,
>>> restar
2014-03-10 22:11 GMT+04:00 Christopher Schultz >
> On 3/10/14, 1:20 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> On 3/10/14, 12:58 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> All,
>>
>>> On 3/10/14, 12:52 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
I stopped Tomcat, completely removed my web application,
restarted Tomcat
It's probably worth asking what "full-fledged enterprise applications"
means. I'm not aware of any specification with that title.
--
Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer mw...@iupui.edu
Machines should not be friendly. Machines should be obedient.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatur
> -Original Message-
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 12:15 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: The Service Component
>
> Christopher Schultz wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > Jeffrey,
> >
> > On 3/10/1
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 11:22 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Executor thread pool
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> John,
>
> On 3/10/14, 11:43 AM, John Smith
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> It's probably worth asking what "full-fledged enterprise applications"
> means. I'm not aware of any specification with that title.
>
>
That was a "Spring" term from the page I was reading, and the reason I
asked the question.
Tomcat itsel
2014-03-10 23:51 GMT+04:00 Konstantin Kolinko :
> 2014-03-10 22:11 GMT+04:00 Christopher Schultz >
>> On 3/10/14, 1:20 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> On 3/10/14, 12:58 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All,
>>>
On 3/10/14, 12:52 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> I stopped Tomcat, comp
On Mar 10, 2014, at 4:16 PM, Leo Donahue wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
>
>> It's probably worth asking what "full-fledged enterprise applications"
>> means. I'm not aware of any specification with that title.
>>
>>
> That was a "Spring" term from the page I w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Konstantin,
On 3/10/14, 4:47 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2014-03-10 23:51 GMT+04:00 Konstantin Kolinko
> :
>> 2014-03-10 22:11 GMT+04:00 Christopher Schultz >
>>> On 3/10/14, 1:20 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
On 3/10/14, 12:58 PM, Christo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 3/10/14, 3:58 PM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> It's probably worth asking what "full-fledged enterprise
> applications" means. I'm not aware of any specification with that
> title.
Those are applications you can charge more for. You know, becaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Daniel,
On 3/10/14, 4:57 PM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2014, at 4:16 PM, Leo Donahue
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Mark H. Wood
>> wrote:
>>
>>> It's probably worth asking what "full-fledged enterprise
>>> applications"
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:15 AM, André Warnier wrote:
>
> It is particularly nice to know that it works, and that the
> element really (apparently) corresponds to "something real" at the Tomcat
> level. So it is apparently not just an "element of order" allowing to
> group Connectors with Engi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Jeffrey,
On 3/10/14, 4:15 PM, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
>> -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz
>> [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Sent: Monday, March 10,
>> 2014 11:22 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Executor thread
>> pool
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Leo Donahue [mailto:donahu...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 9:44 AM
> > To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> > Subject: The Service Component
> >
> > Who uses more than one Service in their serv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Leo,
On 3/10/14, 5:10 PM, Leo Donahue wrote:
> I have to change the following in server.xml when I add more
> Tomcat instances or upgrade:
>
> server shutdown port connector port for HTTP connector port for
> AJP realm org.apache.catalina.realm.Use
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Leo Donahue wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. <
> smithh032...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Actually, i hate clicking on things... I use Windows keyboard shortcuts
> as
> > much as possible.
> >
>
> Even when you run the following comman
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Jeffrey Janner <
jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Leo Donahue [mailto:donahu...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 11:10 AM
> > To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> > Subject: Tomcat7w.exe
> >
> > Did I miss something
On 3/10/2014 2:42 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Leo,
On 3/10/14, 5:10 PM, Leo Donahue wrote:
I have to change the following in server.xml when I add more
Tomcat instances or upgrade:
server shutdown port connector port for HTTP connector port f
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> It's probably worth asking what "full-fledged enterprise applications"
> means. I'm not aware of any specification with that title.
Mark, you are right - there is no specification named "full-fledged
enterprise JEE server". There is only o
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> It's probably worth asking what "full-fledged enterprise applications"
> means. I'm not aware of any specification with that title.
>
Indeed there is no such specification. The point is that Java enterprise
development is not always define
51 matches
Mail list logo
