On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Peter Roßbach wrote:
> HI Vadzim,
>
> as you like a hot HTTP-JMX access use
>
> http://www.jolokia.org/
>
> chili...
>
> Peter
>
>
> Am 23.05.2012 um 00:06 schrieb Vadzim Mikhalenak:
>
> > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Konstantin Kolinko <
> knst.koli...@gmail
Hi,
I have upgraded from Tomcat 5.5 to Tomcat 6.0.35
I am getting java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory
I didn't have this problem before.
Note that I have commons-logging already in my web apps WEB-INF\lib
And this exception is from a class (custom class) running
That's strange. It's working fine for many other people, on thousands of
websites.
Maybe it is your configuration that is not working ?
" is not working !!" is about the best subject that can be imagined, if your intention
was to not get any response at all. The only missing parts are ca
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 05/24/2012 09:40 PM, Anthony J. Biacco wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm still puzzled as to why this behavior just changed between .35 and
>> .36
>>
>
> OK, but if you follow the recommended configuration
> by making sure that workers which are member
On 05/25/2012 11:28 AM, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 05/24/2012 09:40 PM, Anthony J. Biacco wrote:
I'm still puzzled as to why this behavior just changed between .35 and
.36
OK, but if you follow the recommended configuration
by making su
2012/5/25 Hermes Flying :
> Hi,
>
> I have upgraded from Tomcat 5.5 to Tomcat 6.0.35
> I am getting java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory
> I didn't have this problem before.
> Note that I have commons-logging already in my web apps WEB-INF\lib
> And this exceptio
On 25/05/2012 10:03, Hermes Flying wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have upgraded from Tomcat 5.5 to Tomcat 6.0.35
> I am getting java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory
> I didn't have this problem before.
> Note that I have commons-logging already in my web apps WEB-INF\lib
>
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 05/25/2012 11:28 AM, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/24/2012 09:40 PM, Anthony J. Biacco wrote:
I'm still puzzled as to why this behavior just changed
> On 05/24/2012 09:40 PM, Anthony J. Biacco wrote:
> >
> >
> > I'm still puzzled as to why this behavior just changed between .35
and
> > .36
> >
>
> OK, but if you follow the recommended configuration
> by making sure that workers which are members of lb are not
> listed inside worker.list, does
>
> > I'm sure that once we had 'must not be in worker.list',
> > but someone changed that to 'should' inside
> > http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html
> > (see balance_workers directive)
> >
> >
>
> Probably needs to be changed back, or a strong warning added.
>
And t
>
> From: Aman Arora
>To: users@tomcat.apache.org
>Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 10:25 PM
>Subject: mod_jk not working !!
>
>m trying to do a setup of tomcat clustering in which one tomcat is on port
>8080 and other one is on 8081.
>i have downloaded the tomcat-conn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aman,
On 5/25/12 1:25 AM, Aman Arora wrote:
> I'm trying to do a setup of tomcat clustering in which one tomcat
> is on port 8080 and other one is on 8081.
Sounds reasonable.
> i have downloaded the tomcat-connector in the modules folder of my
> apa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark,
On 5/25/12 12:26 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
> . . . just my three cents (since this is long)
More like twelve bucks: you should send this guy a bill for the
message you just put together for him.
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Gnu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 5/25/12 12:07 PM, Anthony J. Biacco wrote:
> If I take the worker out of the worker list, then the loadbalancer
> works. But then accessing the worker by itself it doesn't. It seems
> to be based on the worker.list ordering
>
> Here's the b
> From: Mark Eggers [mailto:its_toas...@yahoo.com]
> Subject: Re: mod_jk not working !!
> I'll try to give a few general directions.
> Again, start simply.
> 1. Stock Apache HTTPD installation (and verify)
> 2. Stock Apache Tomcat installation (and verify)
> 3. mod_jk installation (and verif
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 5/25/12 12:07 PM, Anthony J. Biacco wrote:
> worker.list=jkstatus,app-03,loadbalancer loadbalancer: does NOT
> work (503) app-03: works
>
> worker.list=jkstatus,loadbalancer,app-03 loadbalancer: works
> app-03: does NOT work (503)
>
> work
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 5/25/12 12:41 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Mark Eggers [mailto:its_toas...@yahoo.com] Subject: Re:
>> mod_jk not working !!
>
>
>> I'll try to give a few general directions.
>
>
>
>> Again, start simply.
>
>> 1. Stock Apach
>
> What if you remove the jkstatus worker?
>
worker.list=app-03,loadbalancer
app-03: works
loadbalancer: does NOT work (503)
worker.list=loadbalancer,app-03
app-03: does NOT work (503)
loadbalancer: works
> What if you put jkstatus at the end of the list?
>
worker.list=app-03,loadbalancer,j
GOOD loadbalancer (loadbalancer,app-03)
[Fri May 25 11:52:52 2012] [24754:1138370880] [debug]
wc_get_worker_for_name::jk_worker.c (115): found a worker loadbalancer
[Fri May 25 11:52:52 2012] [24754:1138370880] [debug]
wc_get_name_for_type::jk_worker.c (292): Found worker type 'lb'
[Fri May 25 1
>
> From: Christopher Schultz
>To: Tomcat Users List
>Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 9:57 AM
>Subject: Re: mod_jk not working !!
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Chuck,
>
>On 5/25/12 12:41 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>> From: Mark Eggers [mai
On 25 May 2012, at 19:21, Mark Eggers wrote:
>>
>> From: Christopher Schultz
>> To: Tomcat Users List
>> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 9:57 AM
>> Subject: Re: mod_jk not working !!
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Chuck,
>>
>> On 5/25/12
I'm trying to convert my app to use the preferred catalina base and home
deployment. I understand that this allows for easier migration between tomcat
versions, etc. As a point of reference, I'm reading about how to do this in
Tomcat: The Definitive Guide. Also, I'm dealing with 5.5.35, if th
chad.da...@emc.com wrote:
I'm trying to convert my app to use the preferred catalina base and home deployment. I understand that this allows for easier migration between tomcat versions, etc.
Maybe that is a slight misconception. I think that the separation between catalina_base
and catalina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chad,
On 5/25/12 3:31 PM, chad.da...@emc.com wrote:
> I'm trying to convert my app to use the preferred catalina base
> and home deployment.
I dunno about /preferred/, but it certainly is flexible.
> I understand that this allows for easier migratio
Creating a new Thread as Pid recommended:
Concerning the questions posed by Konstantin Kolinko:
>>You do not say what jars are exactly where and what actual
>>configuration (server.xml and logging) you have.
I am not sure I follow: you mean the version? I have log4j in the WEB-INF\xml,
and commons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hermes,
A: Because it's hard to read.
Q: Why shouldn't I top-post?
- -chris
On 5/25/12 4:40 PM, Hermes Flying wrote:
> Creating a new Thread as Pid recommended: Concerning the questions
> posed by Konstantin Kolinko:
>>> You do not say what jars ar
On 25/05/2012 21:40, Hermes Flying wrote:
> Creating a new Thread as Pid recommended:
> Concerning the questions posed by Konstantin Kolinko:
>>> You do not say what jars are exactly where and what actual
>>> configuration (server.xml and logging) you have.
> I am not sure I follow: you mean the ve
27 matches
Mail list logo
