On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 07:28, wrote:
> Hi ,
> Is there any cap on maximum memory that can be assigned to tomcat
> on 32 bit Windows machines ? I have found out that even if we have 8GB
> memory in the server , can not assign more 1.4/1.5 GB to Tomcat . I also
> found this thread which re
Den 30-11-2011 09:21, Francis GALIEGUE skrev:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 07:28, wrote:
Hi ,
Is there any cap on maximum memory that can be assigned to tomcat
on 32 bit Windows machines ? I have found out that even if we have 8GB
memory in the server , can not assign more 1.4/1.5 GB to T
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:37, Casper Wandahl Schmidt
wrote:
>
[...]
>>
> Another question to ask is, why do you have 8GB memory when running 32bit?
> That is just stupid since 32bit cannot address more than 4GB of memory no
> matter what you do. Any sysadmin should know that right?
>
> disclaimer
Hello ,
The question is not why I would use 32 bit JVM , the question is
whether there is any maximum limit on memory for Tomcat and if yes why ?
Regards,
Subhrajyoti
Mobile: +919830079545
Mail: choudh...@labware.com
Web: www.labware.com
LabWare LIMS Solutions - Results Count
From:
On 29/11/2011 17:47, Sylvain Goulmy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to know it is possible to have equivalent functionality to the
> "extended document root" provided by the WebSphere product. This feature
> allows you to define a location outside the webapp to make contribution
> without having to
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:44, wrote:
> Hello ,
> The question is not why I would use 32 bit JVM , the question is
> whether there is any maximum limit on memory for Tomcat and if yes why ?
The question _is_ why you use a 32bit OS and JVM with 8 GB RAM. Tomcat
is not limited in memory us
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:14:45 +0530, Choudhury wrote
> Hello ,
> The question is not why I would use 32 bit JVM , the
> question is whether there is any maximum limit on memory for Tomcat
> and if yes why ? Regards,
>
It depends on the windows version used actually. From what I remember t
Thanks Igor. I made a mistake though. I actually meant "modifying web.xml
and restarting the webapp."
We want to find a way to change session timeouts - even for existing
sessions - without doing a restart of the webapp.
I know there's also a server-level session timeout in tomcat's
/conf/web.x
>
> So the effect is that multiple physical directories must be searched for
> a given resource?
Correct.
The alias maps a given path to an external directory.
Ok, that's what i had understood.
Can you give an example of how you would like it to work?
Here is the description of the EDR (Ex
When running Tomcat 7.0.20 as a daemon, it doesn't appear to be writing
the logs to the file until tomcat is stopped. Is there some way I can
make tomcat dump the logs it's holding onto?
hi all,
i am getting exception while adding cookies in response
*Stack trace*:
org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter service
SEVERE: An exception or error occurred in the container during the request
processing
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 8192
at
org.apache.coyote.http11.Abstr
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 07:01 -0800, Thom Hehl wrote:
> When running Tomcat 7.0.20 as a daemon, it doesn't appear to be writing
> the logs to the file until tomcat is stopped. Is there some way I can
> make tomcat dump the logs it's holding onto?
>
Just a guess, but it sounds like it could be buffe
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 08:31 -0800, Debraj Mallick wrote:
> hi all,
>
> i am getting exception while adding cookies in response
>
> *Stack trace*:
> org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter service
> SEVERE: An exception or error occurred in the container during the request
> processing
> java.
Thankyou Dan for your quick response my *server.xml*:
Hi Mallick,
Try setting"maxHttpHeaderSize" for the in your
server.xml. Its default value is 8192 bytes. I guess you're exceeding this
limit.
i.e.
More details/exact info:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/config/http.html#Standard_Implementation
Best Regards,
Martin
On 30 Nov 2011, at 10:45, "choudh...@labware.com" wrote:
> Hello ,
>The question is not why I would use 32 bit JVM , the question is
> whether there is any maximum limit on memory for Tomcat and if yes why
No. Tomcat has no knowledge of the memory capacity of the JVM.
p
> ?
> Regards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Subhrajyoti,
On 11/30/11 1:28 AM, choudh...@labware.com wrote:
> Is there any cap on maximum memory that can be assigned to tomcat
> on 32 bit Windows machines?
See this week's thread called "Server crash for memory limit" for some
information about
I am using the out of the box configuration for logging. I did a search of my
logging.properties and didn't find buffersize. Here 'tis.
# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
# contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
# this work for addi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin,
On 11/30/11 12:11 PM, Martin Kuen wrote:
> Try setting"maxHttpHeaderSize" for the in your
> server.xml. Its default value is 8192 bytes. I guess you're
> exceeding this limit.
+1
If you have a lot of cookies or if you are sending SSL cert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Casper,
On 11/30/11 3:37 AM, Casper Wandahl Schmidt wrote:
> Another question to ask is, why do you have 8GB memory when
> running 32bit? That is just stupid since 32bit cannot address more
> than 4GB of memory no matter what you do. Any sysadmin shou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thom,
On 11/30/11 10:01 AM, Thom Hehl wrote:
> When running Tomcat 7.0.20 as a daemon, it doesn't appear to be
> writing the logs to the file until tomcat is stopped. Is there some
> way I can make tomcat dump the logs it's holding onto?
What tool ar
I'm using VI to reading the log file. I running a Windows RDP.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 1:03 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Logging
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thom,
On
Hello
I have an Apache-ajp-Tomcat config that works, but I would like to block any
access to tomcat directly, either on localhost (except for 8009) or from a
client? What/is there a tomcat config to achieve that?
Hi Martin,
i have set maxHttpHeaderSize=81920 but still i am getting exception
*Stack trace:*
30 Nov, 2011 11:38:48 PM org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter service
SEVERE: An exception or error occurred in the container during the request
processing
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException:
>> That is just stupid since 32bit cannot address more
>> than 4GB of memory no matter what you do. Any sysadmin should know
>> that right?
>That's per process. All reasonably recent 32-bit OSs can address way
>more than 4GiB internally.
Yes, but one region in memory is reserved for IO. Drivers u
Just disable HTTP connector (comment it in server.xml).
You can use firewall to protect AJP port from remote clients too.
Ilya Kazakevich,
Developer
JetBrains Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
-Original Message-
From: cpanon [mailto:cpa...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
Hi list,
I'm a bit puzzled.
I want to forward all incoming HTTP-traffic to HTTPS.
Within my $catalina.home/conf/server.xml I've specified the following
connectors:
Then I specified in $catalina.home/conf/web.xml the following
transport-guarantee:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 18:51, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
[...]
>
> Running a machine with more than 4GiB in 32-bit mode isn't stupid at
> all IMO. If you have relatively small processes, there's no need for
> the overhead of 64-bit even if you have 16GiB or more.
>
This is quite the opposite: a
Hi,
IT is Mac OSX 10.6.8
java -version
java version "1.6.0_20"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_20-b02-279-10M3065)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 16.3-b01-279, mixed mode)
tomcat is 7.0.21
database is Sybase ASE 15.0.3
We are getting this error in about every half hour
Am 30.11.2011 12:08, schrieb j...@gniffelnieuws.net:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:14:45 +0530, Choudhury wrote
Hello ,
The question is not why I would use 32 bit JVM , the
question is whether there is any maximum limit on memory for Tomcat
and if yes why ? Regards,
The limit is the JVM, not
Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 18:51, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
[...]
Running a machine with more than 4GiB in 32-bit mode isn't stupid at
all IMO. If you have relatively small processes, there's no need for
the overhead of 64-bit even if you have 16GiB or more.
This is qui
>>Does the fact of having a system with a 64-bit CPU (and OS) necessarily
(or usually) imply
>>that data transfers between CPU and RAM happen also 64-bit in parallel ?
That depends on front bus width. Modern PCs has 64-bit bus AFAIK.
In "64-bit CPU" 64 is register size and nothing else (although
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 22:38, André Warnier wrote:
[...]
>
> I am not knowledgeable at all in such questions, and while you are at it let
> me ask a question :
> Does the fact of having a system with a 64-bit CPU (and OS) necessarily (or
> usually) imply that data transfers between CPU and RAM ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thom,
On 11/30/11 1:04 PM, Thom Hehl wrote:
> I'm using VI to reading the log file. I running a Windows RDP.
Are you using 'vi' in a way that allows it to get updates from the
file? I'm no 'vi' expert, but I'm sure it reads the entire file at
startup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Debraj,
On 11/30/11 1:16 PM, Debraj Mallick wrote:
> i have set maxHttpHeaderSize=81920 but still i am getting
> exception *Stack trace:* 30 Nov, 2011 11:38:48 PM
> org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter service SEVERE: An
> exception or error oc
Hi,
I'm new here, and hope that someone can help.
I was wondering if any of the LDAP-type realms (e.g., JNDIRealm, etc.) support
an authentication mode where no password or credentials are required? In other
words, where just a userID/username is presented, and if that userID/username
is pres
hi Christopher,
my tomcat version is : 7.0.14
working on Window7 with JDK 1.6
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Debraj,
>
> On 11/30/11 1:16 PM, Debraj Mallick wrote:
> > i have set max
37 matches
Mail list logo
