Re: Should I use mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp for my Apache2 to Tomcat5 connector on AIX ?

2009-10-08 Thread Tobias Crefeld
Am Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:54:56 -0500 schrieb "Strickland, Lawrence P" : > I am having some problems building mod_jk on AIX and I see the same > functionality is supported in mod_proxy_ajp. > Does anyone have some good reason why I should use one over the other? Using mod_proxy_ajp we got problems w

Re: Should I use mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp for my Apache2 to Tomcat5 connector on AIX ?

2009-09-24 Thread Mark Thomas
Strickland, Lawrence P wrote: > Should I use mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp for my Apache2 to Tomcat5 connector > on AIX ? > > I am having some problems building mod_jk on AIX and I see the same > functionality is supported in mod_proxy_ajp. > Does anyone have some good reason why I s

Should I use mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp for my Apache2 to Tomcat5 connector on AIX ?

2009-09-24 Thread Strickland, Lawrence P
Should I use mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp for my Apache2 to Tomcat5 connector on AIX ? I am having some problems building mod_jk on AIX and I see the same functionality is supported in mod_proxy_ajp. Does anyone have some good reason why I should use one over the other? Larry Strickland Lead Systems

Re: when does use mod_jk and jni?

2007-09-11 Thread fredk2
the docs: "Don't use it.". > > Regards, > > Rainer > > fredk2 wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Reading the documentation for mod_jk (1.2.25 --enable-jni), I am >> curious >>

Re: when does use mod_jk and jni?

2007-09-11 Thread Rainer Jung
5 --enable-jni), I am curious about something. In what case do you use mod_jk jni ? Thank you - Fred - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional comm

Re: when does use mod_jk and jni?

2007-09-10 Thread Bill Barker
"fredk2" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi, > > Reading the documentation for mod_jk (1.2.25 --enable-jni), I am curious > about something. > In what case do you use mod_jk jni ? > TC 3.3.x is the only version that su

when does use mod_jk and jni?

2007-09-10 Thread fredk2
Hi, Reading the documentation for mod_jk (1.2.25 --enable-jni), I am curious about something. In what case do you use mod_jk jni ? Thank you - Fred -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/when-does-use-mod_jk-and-jni--tf4417743.html#a12600560 Sent from the Tomcat - User

Re: use mod_jk

2006-09-21 Thread Raffaele Viola
If I write JkMount /MyApp/* worker1 can I load all the page contained in the directory $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/ MyApp/ or I have a row for every directories? for example: JkMount /MyApp/dir1/* worker1 JkMount /MyApp/dir2/* worker1 thanks Raffo On 9/21/06, Santosh Puranshettiwar <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: use mod_jk

2006-09-21 Thread Santosh Puranshettiwar
Sorry I didn't get you question well but see if this helps. http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-3.2-doc/tomcat-apache-howto.html#adapter_jk_vs_js Santosh. Raffaele Viola wrote: Hi all, I Apache web server with Tomcat and mod_jk. The row JkMount /MyApp/* worker1 in the httpd.conf file is it enough

use mod_jk

2006-09-21 Thread Raffaele Viola
Hi all, I Apache web server with Tomcat and mod_jk. The row JkMount /MyApp/* worker1 in the httpd.conf file is it enought to allow the loading of all the web application from Apache? Thanks Raffo

Re: why use mod_jk?

2006-02-24 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Feb 24, 2006, at 10:11 AM, Brad O'Hearne wrote: Question below: On Feb 24, 2006, at 2:05 AM, Bill Barker wrote: "Brad O'Hearne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy_ajp? Yet another twist. Its just hard for me to believe that "how do I integrate tomcat

Re: Which direction: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp? (was: why use mod_jk?)

2006-02-24 Thread Chris Lear
* Brad O'Hearne wrote (24/02/06 15:14): > Josh, > > Thanks a lot for your answer. I am using Apache 2.2.x. Now onto my > next question. Bill Barker suggested the httpd.conf / mod_proxy_ajp > directive side of the equation. Doesn't there have to be a connector > in tomcat's server.xml which w

RE: Which direction: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp? (was: why use mod_jk?)

2006-02-24 Thread Fenlason, Josh
ist > Subject: Re: Which direction: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp? (was: > why use mod_jk?) > > > Josh, > > Thanks a lot for your answer. I am using Apache 2.2.x. Now onto my > next question. Bill Barker suggested the httpd.conf / mod_proxy_ajp > directive side of the eq

Re: why use mod_jk?

2006-02-24 Thread Jess Holle
Brad O'Hearne wrote: Ok, I understand what it is trying to do here. But I assume there is a connector that has to be loaded in Tomcat to enable listening for the ajp protocol on port 8009, no? Is there documentation about this anywhere? From Tomcat's side of the connection there is no differenc

Re: why use mod_jk?

2006-02-24 Thread Jess Holle
Brad O'Hearne wrote: I am looking forward to mod_proxy_ajp as it is supposed be a tiny bit faster. You say you are "looking forward to mod_proxy_ajp" -- does this mean its not available yet, or you just aren't using it yet? While I am glad to learn now of mod_proxy_ajp, I guess this kind of a

Re: Which direction: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp? (was: why use mod_jk?)

2006-02-24 Thread Brad O'Hearne
else, mod_jk is the way to go. , Josh. -Original Message- From: Brad O'Hearne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 9:02 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Which direction: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp? (was: why use mod_jk?) I suppose this question deserved its

Re: why use mod_jk?

2006-02-24 Thread Brad O'Hearne
Question below: On Feb 24, 2006, at 2:05 AM, Bill Barker wrote: "Brad O'Hearne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy_ajp? Yet another twist. Its just hard for me to believe that "how do I integrate tomcat and apache httpd?" is such a mystery / unknown. Thi

RE: Which direction: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp? (was: why use mod_jk?)

2006-02-24 Thread Fenlason, Josh
e [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 9:02 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Which direction: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp? (was: why > use mod_jk?) > > > I suppose this question deserved its own thread. Before I spend any > more time trying to get this

Which direction: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp? (was: why use mod_jk?)

2006-02-24 Thread Brad O'Hearne
I suppose this question deserved its own thread. Before I spend any more time trying to get this configured, I would like to know what is the best way to proceed: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp? Thanks, Brad On Feb 24, 2006, at 7:49 AM, Brad O'Hearne wrote: Jess, Thanks for the reply. Responses

Re: why use mod_jk?

2006-02-24 Thread Brad O'Hearne
Jess, Thanks for the reply. Responses below: On Feb 24, 2006, at 6:51 AM, Jess Holle wrote: If you're using Apache 1.3.x or 2.0.x, mod_jk is pretty simple overall. No, you don't want to even try in-process stuff and, yes, if you have a firewall in between Apache and Tomcat that drops idle

Re: why use mod_jk?

2006-02-24 Thread Jess Holle
If you're using Apache 1.3.x or 2.0.x, mod_jk is pretty simple overall. No, you don't want to even try in-process stuff and, yes, if you have a firewall in between Apache and Tomcat that drops idle connections you should read carefully (this is covered by the docs). The only big complaint I h

Re: why use mod_jk?

2006-02-24 Thread Bill Barker
"Brad O'Hearne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > mod_proxy_ajp? Yet another twist. Its just hard for me to believe that > "how do I integrate tomcat and apache httpd?" is such a mystery / unknown. > This seems like it would be question #1 on any Tomcat FAQ. > > So w

Re: why use mod_jk?

2006-02-24 Thread Brad O'Hearne
mod_proxy_ajp? Yet another twist. Its just hard for me to believe that "how do I integrate tomcat and apache httpd?" is such a mystery / unknown. This seems like it would be question #1 on any Tomcat FAQ. So where can I found out more about mod_proxy_ajp. Is there a Tomcat resource which expla

Re: why use mod_jk?

2006-02-24 Thread Mladen Turk
Brad O'Hearne wrote: After wasting time trying to configure mod_jk, I thought I'd just wipe my mind free and just play dumb for a moment. If Apache can proxy requests using mod_proxy, what is the benefit of using mod_jk as an integration technique between httpd and tomcat, Faster up to 50% ov

Re: why use mod_jk?

2006-02-24 Thread Bill Barker
"Brad O'Hearne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > After wasting time trying to configure mod_jk, I thought I'd just wipe my > mind free and just play dumb for a moment. If Apache can proxy requests > using mod_proxy, what is the benefit of using mod_jk as an integrat

why use mod_jk?

2006-02-23 Thread Brad O'Hearne
After wasting time trying to configure mod_jk, I thought I'd just wipe my mind free and just play dumb for a moment. If Apache can proxy requests using mod_proxy, what is the benefit of using mod_jk as an integration technique between httpd and tomcat, if integration is *not* in-process, which