Re: troughput difference

2016-01-13 Thread Rafael Oliveira de Mattos
2015 15:28:49 Assunto: Re: troughput difference Aurélien, On 12/24/15 4:17 AM, Aurélien Terrestris wrote: > probably this won't solve your problem but I notice that the random seems > slow : > Creation of SecureRandom instance for session ID generation using > [SHA1PRNG] took [9,870

Re: troughput difference

2015-12-24 Thread Christopher Schultz
Aurélien, On 12/24/15 4:17 AM, Aurélien Terrestris wrote: > probably this won't solve your problem but I notice that the random seems > slow : > Creation of SecureRandom instance for session ID generation using > [SHA1PRNG] took [9,870] milliseconds. > > Maybe should you then start by fixing this

Re: troughput difference

2015-12-24 Thread Mark Thomas
On 23/12/2015 20:29, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Thanks for confirming that: often, we have people with two radically > different setups wanting to know why things are behaving differently. > > There have been many changes to the connector code between Tomcat 6 and > Tomcat 8, mostly to make s

Re: troughput difference

2015-12-24 Thread Aurélien Terrestris
Hi probably this won't solve your problem but I notice that the random seems slow : Creation of SecureRandom instance for session ID generation using [SHA1PRNG] took [9,870] milliseconds. Maybe should you then start by fixing this, it has been discussed many times on the mailing list ( securerand

Re: troughput difference

2015-12-23 Thread Christopher Schultz
Rafael, On 12/23/15 2:12 PM, Rafael Oliveira de Mattos wrote: > Christopher, > > Tomcat 6: boot.log > INFORMA합ES: Loaded APR based Apache Tomcat Native library 1.1.33 using APR > version 1.5.2. > dez 14, 2015 5:32:14 PM org.apache.catalina.core.AprLifecycleListener init > INFORMA합ES: APR capabil

Re: troughput difference

2015-12-23 Thread Rafael Oliveira de Mattos
23 de dezembro de 2015 16:17:17 Assunto: Re: troughput difference Rafael, On 12/23/15 9:17 AM, Rafael Oliveira de Mattos wrote: > We are using the APR connector in both cases. Can you confirm you are using the same version of tcnative/APR/OpenSSL in both cases? Can you please copy/paste the

Re: troughput difference

2015-12-23 Thread Christopher Schultz
Rafael, On 12/23/15 9:17 AM, Rafael Oliveira de Mattos wrote: > We are using the APR connector in both cases. Can you confirm you are using the same version of tcnative/APR/OpenSSL in both cases? Can you please copy/paste the startup messages from each version? -chris -

Re: troughput difference

2015-12-23 Thread Rafael Oliveira de Mattos
List" Enviadas: Terça-feira, 22 de dezembro de 2015 21:09:07 Assunto: Re: troughput difference Rafael. On 12/21/15 1:48 PM, Rafael Oliveira de Mattos wrote: > We are using only the http connector. Here is the configuration: > > redirectPort="${port.https}" connection

Re: troughput difference

2015-12-22 Thread Christopher Schultz
aring apples to apples, here. -chris > - Mensagem original - De: "Christopher Schultz" > Para: "Tomcat Users List" > Enviadas: Segunda-feira, 21 de dezembro de > 2015 14:33:31 Assunto: Re: troughput difference > > Rafael, > > On 12/17/15

Re: troughput difference

2015-12-21 Thread Rafael Oliveira de Mattos
Christopher, We are using only the http connector. Here is the configuration: The server has 8 cores. -Rafael - Mensagem original - De: "Christopher Schultz" Para: "Tomcat Users List" Enviadas: Segunda-feira, 21 de dezembro de 2015 14:33:31 Assunto: Re:

Re: troughput difference

2015-12-21 Thread Christopher Schultz
Rafael, On 12/17/15 3:09 PM, Rafael Oliveira de Mattos wrote: > I'm having different results in Tomcat performance using version 6.0.37 and > 8.0.23. > > Using tomcat 6 we usually have > 5000 ~ rpm with a response time of 80ms > > Using tomcat 8 the max that we can get is > 2000 ~ rpm with

troughput difference

2015-12-17 Thread Rafael Oliveira de Mattos
Hello, I'm having different results in Tomcat performance using version 6.0.37 and 8.0.23. Using tomcat 6 we usually have 5000 ~ rpm with a response time of 80ms Using tomcat 8 the max that we can get is 2000 ~ rpm with a response time of 200ms We are using the same jdk version 1.7.0.80,