On 08/10/2021 11:43, Me Self wrote:
I would like to test a custom tomcat valve with tomcat-embed and junit. Is
that possible?
Found a few tomcat-embed samples on the web but most seem to only deal with
setting up a webapp - something along the lines:
@BeforeAll
public static void setup
I would like to test a custom tomcat valve with tomcat-embed and junit. Is
that possible?
Found a few tomcat-embed samples on the web but most seem to only deal with
setting up a webapp - something along the lines:
@BeforeAll
public static void setup() throws LifecycleException {
Tomcat tomcat
ng the certificates from latest tomcat source code
> (https://github.com/apache/tomcat/tree/7.0.x/test/org/apache/tomcat/util/net).
>
> Please let me know if there is any other way to resolve this issue without
> downloading the latest certificate once they are expired.
Set the da
omcat/tree/7.0.x/test/org/apache/tomcat/util/net).
Please let me know if there is any other way to resolve this issue without
downloading the latest certificate once they are expired.
Thanks and Regards,
Ankitha
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday
On 23/03/2020 07:18, Udupa, Ankitha K wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are facing issue while triggering Ant Test with Tomcat 7.0.84
That version is over two years old and has a number of known security
vulnerabilities that are likely to apply to a typical installation.
The Tomcat community
Hi,
We are facing issue while triggering Ant Test with Tomcat 7.0.84 on HP UX IA/PA
architecture with Java ( Java 7.0 in IA and Java 6.0 in PA).
Please kindly help me to resolve these failures.
TEST-org.apache.catalina.comet.TestCometProcessor.NIO.txt:ERROR:null
TEST
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 3:54 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance test with Tomcat 9 shows increased cpu/disk usage
because of repeated opening/closing of jars in WEB-INF/lib
On 09/10/2019 22:58, Rhuberg,Anthony wrote
imply that.
-Original Message-
From: john.e.gr...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 6:54 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: RE: Performance test with Tomcat 9 shows increased cpu/disk usage
because of repeated opening/closing of jars in WEB-INF/lib
Tony
Tony,
> -Original Message-
> From: Rhuberg,Anthony
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 5:22 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Performance test with Tomcat 9 shows increased cpu/disk usage
> because of repeated opening/closing of jars in WEB-INF/lib
the related application jars - which if happening
enough can cause the high cpu/disk usage as we observed in our performance
tests.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 3:54 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance test with Tomcat
were closed was low enough that the
performance impact was not noticed.
Mark
>
> Thanks,
> Tony
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2019 5:32 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Performance test with Tomcat 9
I have not seen the trace message for modified()... So my understanding of this
is wrong.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Carter-Brown
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2019 4:42 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Performance test with Tomcat 9 shows increased cpu/disk usage
because of
: Performance test with Tomcat 9 shows increased cpu/disk usage
because of repeated opening/closing of jars in WEB-INF/lib
On 09/10/2019 21:03, Rhuberg,Anthony wrote:
> This seems to alleviate the issue... in context.xml (sc-test#sc.xml)
> swallowOutput="true" backgroundProcessorDelay=&q
On 09/10/2019 21:03, Rhuberg,Anthony wrote:
> This seems to alleviate the issue... in context.xml (sc-test#sc.xml)
> backgroundProcessorDelay="90">
>
> Not sure if this is the context reload trigger... i.e. the
> webappLoader.backgroundProcess method is triggered e
n the filesystem are not changing - unless there is something
> happening in the classes folder.
>
> Thanks
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2019 3:56 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Performance test with Tomcat 9 s
, 2019 3:56 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance test with Tomcat 9 shows increased cpu/disk usage
because of repeated opening/closing of jars in WEB-INF/lib
On 09/10/2019 20:08, Rhuberg,Anthony wrote:
> On the other thread: Is this genuine class loading (in which case
This seems to alleviate the issue... in context.xml (sc-test#sc.xml)
Not sure if this is the context reload trigger... i.e. the
webappLoader.backgroundProcess method is triggered every 90 seconds... the
reloadable property on Context is NOT set (default = false). So then how does
modified
cache it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rhuberg,Anthony
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2019 2:53 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Performance test with Tomcat 9 shows increased cpu/disk usage
> because of repeated opening/closing of jars in WEB-INF/lib
>
> Ju
, 2019 2:53 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Performance test with Tomcat 9 shows increased cpu/disk usage
because of repeated opening/closing of jars in WEB-INF/lib
Just noticed another thread on this topic: RE: Tomcat discards and reloads the
jar files from the webapps folder.
Setting
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Performance test with Tomcat 9 shows increased cpu/disk usage because
of repeated opening/closing of jars in WEB-INF/lib
Background:
In the last few months we migrated our web application from Tomcat 7.0.55 to
Tomcat 9.0.19 (26). That transition was
Background:
In the last few months we migrated our web application from Tomcat 7.0.55 to
Tomcat 9.0.19 (26). That transition was relatively straightforward until we
reviewed the results of our performance tests. Those tests showed an increase
in CPU usage and disk I/O on our Windows 2012 server.
f Tomcat Native
> available. I work with macOS and install programs with homebrew. For the last
> updates of Tomcat 9 I updated the Homebrew Formula and wanted to do the same
> for Tomcat Native [1].
>
> During the update of the formula I stumbled over the requirement that no
h homebrew. For the last
updates of Tomcat 9 I updated the Homebrew Formula and wanted to do the same
for Tomcat Native [1].
During the update of the formula I stumbled over the requirement that now a
test for the formula is necessary [2].
Unfortunately, I have no idea how such a test could loo
]
org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke Failed
authenticate() test
13-Feb-2019 14:07:56.816 FINE [http-nio-8080-exec-5]
org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke Security
checking request GET /favicon.ico
13-Feb-2019 14:07:56.816 FINE [http-nio-8080-exec-5
>>> EType:
>> sun.security.krb5.internal.crypto.Aes256CtsHmacSha1EType
>> >>>Delegated Creds have pname=myusern...@mycompany.com
>> sname=krbtgt/mycompany@mycompany.com authtime=null
>> starttime=20190208095329Z
>> endtime=201902
logout
[Krb5LoginModule]: logged out Subject
08-Feb-2019 11:26:27.415 FINE [https-jsse-nio-443-exec-5]
org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke Failed
authenticate() test
I'm happy with the part where "myusern...@mycompany.com"
nModule]: logged out Subject
08-Feb-2019 11:26:27.415 FINE [https-jsse-nio-443-exec-5]
org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke Failed
authenticate() test
I'm happy with the part where "myusern...@mycompany.com" is returned
back from the AD, so I think most of the stuff is configured
2018-06-27 23:34 GMT+03:00 kevin ferguson :
> Hi Guys
>
> Please delete if received I send about 6 emails all bounced not sure why.
> The only think I can think is, the mailing list does not like photo
> atttachements.
There rules are specified here:
http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html#tomcat-user
Hi Guys
Please delete if received I send about 6 emails all bounced not sure why.
The only think I can think is, the mailing list does not like photo
atttachements.
Kevin
ed?
Mark
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:23:44PM +, Scott Hoenigman wrote:
Are you using a load balancer?
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
Original message
From: David Wall
Date: 5/10/18 6:15 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: configuring ciphers
used?
>
>Mark
>
>
>>
>> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:23:44PM +, Scott Hoenigman wrote:
>>> Are you using a load balancer?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
>>>
>>>
>>> Original m
here, of course.
/charlie
>> On 5/10/18 2:45 PM, Baron Fujimoto wrote:
>>> I'm trying to improve our grade on SSL Labs SSL server test[1] for
>>> our Tomcat configuraton. Currently, their report caps our grade at B
>>> because, "This server does not su
, Scott Hoenigman wrote:
>> Are you using a load balancer?
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
>>
>>
>> Original message
>> From: David Wall
>> Date: 5/10/18 6:15 PM (GMT-06:00)
>> To: users@tomcat.apache
t;
> Original message
>From: David Wall
>Date: 5/10/18 6:15 PM (GMT-06:00)
>To: users@tomcat.apache.org
>Subject: Re: configuring ciphers for SSL Labs server test
>
>We're doing good with this:
>
> protocols="TLSv1.1, TLSv1.2" honorCip
Are you using a load balancer?
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
Original message
From: David Wall
Date: 5/10/18 6:15 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: configuring ciphers for SSL Labs server test
We're doing good with this:
On 5/
5/10/18 2:45 PM, Baron Fujimoto wrote:
I'm trying to improve our grade on SSL Labs SSL server test[1] for our
Tomcat configuraton. Currently, their report caps our grade at B because,
"This server does not support Authenticated encryption (AEAD) cipher
suites". They report th
I'm trying to improve our grade on SSL Labs SSL server test[1] for our
Tomcat configuraton. Currently, their report caps our grade at B because,
"This server does not support Authenticated encryption (AEAD) cipher
suites". They report that we support the following cipher sui
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Keiichi,
On 11/1/17 3:28 AM, Keiichi Fujino wrote:
> Hi Dave.
>
> Your Interceptor settings are as follows.
>
>
>> > className="org.apache.catalina.tribes.group.
>> interceptors.TcpFailureDetector"> > className="org.apache.catalina.tribes.group
Hi Dave.
Your Interceptor settings are as follows.
>
>
>
>
>uniqueId="{0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15}">
>className="org.apache.catalina.tribes.membership.StaticMember"
> domain="clustertest" host="xxx.xxx
On Mon, 2017-10-30 at 09:15 -0400, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Dave,
>
> Can you please post your and associated elements from
> conf/server.xml -- minus any secrets that may have crept in there?
> Also, what does your network look like? Any intermediates such as
> load
> balancers/firewalls? Wh
follow it aren't too dumb.
>
> I've recently started a new job and have inherited a half-finished
> tomcat cluster on solaris.
>
> While I'm not going to immediately try and finish that cluster, I
> would like to try setting up some test instances to ensure I know
solaris.
While I'm not going to immediately try and finish that cluster, I would
like to try setting up some test instances to ensure I know what to
expect - but I'm having trouble doing even this.
I've gotten my head round how to set up individual instances of Tomcat
8.5.23 runn
On 03/08/17 12:09, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Hello,
> My WebEx meeting is in progress.
Sorry folks. PLease ignore this.
Mark
>
>
>
> *Test v2*
> Thursday, 3 August 2017
> 12:09 | GMT Summer Time (London, GMT+01:00) | 1 hr
>
> Meeting number: 314 070 218
Hello,
My WebEx meeting is in progress.
Test v2
Thursday, 3 August 2017
12:09 | GMT Summer Time (London, GMT+01:00) | 1 hr
Meeting number: 314 070 218
Join Meeting
https://pivotal.webex.com/pivotal/e.php?MTID=mf67360b0c9cb219d96a2000a2fcfd729
Can't join the meeting?
tomcat 7.0.77 with java7 on HP-UX(OS) itanium(IA64)
>> processor.
>>> After building it successful I am running *ant test*.
>>> Multiple tests are failing due to below exception.
>>>
>>> *Exception in thread "Thread-18" java.lang.AssertionErro
P-UX(OS) itanium(IA64)
> processor.
> > After building it successful I am running *ant test*.
> > Multiple tests are failing due to below exception.
> >
> > *Exception in thread "Thread-18" java.lang.AssertionError: Option not
> found*
>
> Full stack trac
On 29/04/17 03:47, Arjit Gupta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am building tomcat 7.0.77 with java7 on HP-UX(OS) itanium(IA64) processor.
> After building it successful I am running *ant test*.
> Multiple tests are failing due to below exception.
>
> *Exception in thread "Thread-18
Hi,
I am building tomcat 7.0.77 with java7 on HP-UX(OS) itanium(IA64) processor.
After building it successful I am running *ant test*.
Multiple tests are failing due to below exception.
*Exception in thread "Thread-18" java.lang.AssertionError: Option not found*
Fail test cases are:-
:10, Szymon Czaja wrote:
I will run a test in the meantime to check but this is very much
unlikely,
I can see on the Amazon console that the load balancer CPU is hardly
doing
anything with peaks at 2%. Let's assume load balancer is not an issue.
I am not saying that the proxy cannot hand
Czaja
wrote:
> Completely agree. I am in the process of setting up a direct connection to
> Tomcat bypassing load balancer. Will give an update soon.
>
> Szymon
>
> On 28 November 2016 at 13:40, André Warnier (tomcat)
> wrote:
>
>> On 28.11.2016 14:10, Szymon Czaja wrot
Completely agree. I am in the process of setting up a direct connection to
Tomcat bypassing load balancer. Will give an update soon.
Szymon
On 28 November 2016 at 13:40, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
> On 28.11.2016 14:10, Szymon Czaja wrote:
>
>> I will run a test in the meantime
On 28.11.2016 14:10, Szymon Czaja wrote:
I will run a test in the meantime to check but this is very much unlikely,
I can see on the Amazon console that the load balancer CPU is hardly doing
anything with peaks at 2%. Let's assume load balancer is not an issue.
I am not saying that the
I will run a test in the meantime to check but this is very much unlikely,
I can see on the Amazon console that the load balancer CPU is hardly doing
anything with peaks at 2%. Let's assume load balancer is not an issue.
Szymon
On 28 November 2016 at 12:29, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
Szymon
On 28 November 2016 at 10:05, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 28/11/2016 09:53, Szymon Czaja wrote:
Hi,
I have asked the question on StackOverflow but I am not getting much
response:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/40793335/why-tomcat-
does-not-pass-a-tsung-performance-test-at-40-requests-
09:53, Szymon Czaja wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have asked the question on StackOverflow but I am not getting much
> > response:
> >
> > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/40793335/why-tomcat-
> > does-not-pass-a-tsung-performance-test-at-40-requests-per-second
> &g
On 28/11/2016 09:53, Szymon Czaja wrote:
> Hi,
> I have asked the question on StackOverflow but I am not getting much
> response:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/40793335/why-tomcat-
> does-not-pass-a-tsung-performance-test-at-40-requests-per-second
>
> Could anyon
Hi,
I have asked the question on StackOverflow but I am not getting much
response:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/40793335/why-tomcat-
does-not-pass-a-tsung-performance-test-at-40-requests-per-second
Could anyone help me understand why is Tomcat unable to keep up with the
processing when
shouldn't have noticed a change with a Tomcat upgrade.
>
> ==> We have configured the secure random source as below to avoid the
entropy issue -
securerandom.source=file:/dev/./urandom
> Turning on the StuckThreadDetectionValve with 1 second threshold as
> > shown bel
r" observation. But this has
absolutely nothing to do with Tomcat -- it's all within the JVM so you
shouldn't have noticed a change with a Tomcat upgrade.
> Turning on the StuckThreadDetectionValve with 1 second threshold as
> shown below revealed that there are warning logs with threa
verifications. Turning on the
StuckThreadDetectionValve with 1 second threshold as shown below revealed
that there are warning logs with threads stuck showing up in the next run
of the test. This clearly shows that the slowness is due to the threads
getting into the blocked state. More are in the
Looks like attachments are not allowed so only sharing the contents of
threadDump3.out
2015-11-04 22:55:58
Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (24.79-b02 mixed mode):
"http-nio-8443-exec-147" daemon prio=10 tid=0x7f5c1c005000 nid=0x6241
runnable [0x7f5bd30ef000]
java.lan
ple ranka wrote:
> > Also forgot to mention that setting maxKeepAliveRequests to -1 did not
> > help. As expected from the connector documentation the default value for
> > this attribute is 100 and we have a 60 user test set up.
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:1
Dimple,
On 11/3/15 11:24 PM, dimple ranka wrote:
> Also forgot to mention that setting maxKeepAliveRequests to -1 did not
> help. As expected from the connector documentation the default value for
> this attribute is 100 and we have a 60 user test set up.
>
> On Wed, Nov 4,
Also forgot to mention that setting maxKeepAliveRequests to -1 did not
help. As expected from the connector documentation the default value for
this attribute is 100 and we have a 60 user test set up.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:18 AM, dimple ranka wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Another observat
nt we deploy the web application in a tomcat7 container
the slowness with subsequent runs shows up.
Thanks,
Dimple
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:36 PM, dimple ranka wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> The test client is running on another machine.
>
> The server side test code is written using jerse
Hi Mark,
The test client is running on another machine.
The server side test code is written using jersey 1.17.
Will try out with playing with maxKeepAliveRequests.
My only concern is that if jmeter is doing spoofy things then why it doesnt
show up on tomcat6.
Thanks,
Dimple
On Tue, Nov 3
18 runs/sec*
> *RUN3 ==> ** 19043.7908496732** runs/sec*
> * RUN4 ==> ** 19001.71568627451 runs/sec*
> ##
Every performance test I have ever done with Tomcat, the first run has
had poorer performance while the system warms up (thread
Hi all,
I am doing some performance data collection on tomcat7 on a 8 processor
high end machine with CentOS release 6.7 (Final) operating system and i am
observing slowness with subsequent runs of the same jmeter test. Here are
the version and specfication details followed by the endpoint source
found some time to look into this. It appears that
>> this fix in 8u40 onwards broke SPNEGO.
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8048194
>>
>> The fix that was applied wasn't the one suggested in the bug report.
>>
>> I've spent some time looking
va.net/browse/JDK-8048194
>
> The fix that was applied wasn't the one suggested in the bug report.
>
> I've spent some time looking at the code but I haven't found a way
> around this yet.
Good news (sort of). I have an *extremely* dirty hack that fixes this on
m
On 29/03/2015 23:13, André Warnier wrote:
> David Marsh wrote:
>> I've tested all the following public JDKs
>> jdk-7u45-windows-i586.exe
>> jdk-7u65-windows-i586.exe
>> jdk-7u75-windows-i586.exe
>> jdk-8-windows-i586.exe
>> jdk-8u5-windows-i586.exe
>> jdk-8u11-windows-i586.exe
>> jdk-8u20-windows-i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Arjit,
On 5/7/15 12:09 AM, Arjit Gupta wrote:
> Thanks Tomcat Community for the quick reply.
>
> As answer provided by Mark the test certificate used by unit tests
> have been expired, So please provide me any link where I could
&g
Hi Tomcat Community,
I have downloaded latest certificates from
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/test/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/
And now test are passing.
Thanks Tomcat community :)
Arjit Kumar
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Arjit Gupta wrote:
> Thanks Tomcat Community
Thanks Tomcat Community for the quick reply.
As answer provided by Mark the test certificate used by unit tests have
been expired, So please provide me any link where I could download the
certificates in order to test these unit tests successful.
Thanks in Advance.
Arjit Kumar
On Wed, May 6
>> Hello Tomcat Community,
>>>>
>>>> I am building tomcat 7.0.59 with java7 on HP-UX(OS)
>>>> itanium(IA64) processor. After building it successful I am
>>>> running *ant test*. Which is failing due to except
;>> processor. After building it successful I am running *ant test*.
>>> Which is failing due to exception which is as below:
>>>
>>> Testcase: testSimpleSsl took 4.085 sec Caused an ERROR
>>> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path valida
Tomcat Community,
>>>>
>>>> I am building tomcat 7.0.59 with java7 on HP-UX(OS)
>>>> itanium(IA64) processor. After building it successful I am
>>>> running *ant test*. Which is failing due to exception which
>>>> is as below:
>>>
t;> processor. After building it successful I am running *ant test*.
>>> Which is failing due to exception which is as below:
>>>
>>> Testcase: testSimpleSsl took 4.085 sec Caused an ERROR
>>> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path validatio
uccessful I am running *ant test*.
>> Which is failing due to exception which is as below:
>>
>> Testcase: testSimpleSsl took 4.085 sec Caused an ERROR
>> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path validation
>> failed: java.security.c
On 06/05/2015 10:43, Arjit Gupta wrote:
> Hello Tomcat Community,
>
> I am building tomcat 7.0.59 with java7 on HP-UX(OS) itanium(IA64) processor.
> After building it successful I am running *ant test*. Which is failing due
> to exception which is as below:
>
> Testcase: tes
Hello Tomcat Community,
I am building tomcat 7.0.59 with java7 on HP-UX(OS) itanium(IA64) processor.
After building it successful I am running *ant test*. Which is failing due
to exception which is as below:
Testcase: testSimpleSsl took 4.085 sec
Caused an ERROR
he.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBa
se.invoke Calling authenticate()
25-Mar-2015 15:46:28.304 FINE [http-nio-80-exec-1]
org.apache.catalina.authenticator.SpnegoAuthentic
ator.authenticate No authorization header sent by client
25-Mar-2015 15:46:28.305 FINE [http-nio-80-exec-1]
org.apache.c
-2015 14:21:23.933 FINE [http-nio-80-exec-1]
org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBa
se.invoke Calling authenticate()
28-Mar-2015 14:21:23.933 FINE [http-nio-80-exec-1]
org.apache.catalina.authenticator.SpnegoAuthentic
ator.authenticate No authorization header sent by client
28-Mar-201
works ?
David
Subject: Re: SPNEGO test configuration with Manager webapp
From: felix.schumac...@internetallee.de
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 10:13:29 +0200
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Am 28. März 2015 17:46:50 MEZ, schrieb Mark Thomas :
On 28/03/2015 14:43, David Marsh wrote:
Ok so I w
-i586.exe <-- Only this one fails SPNEGO / Bad GSS Token
Seems a recent "fix" must broken it.
David
> Subject: Re: SPNEGO test configuration with Manager webapp
> From: felix.schumac...@internetallee.de
> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015
ame issues, until I changed the Java on the tomcat
>server to JDK 7 u45.
>>
>> It appears there are breaking changes to JAAS/GSS in newer JDKs ?
>
>Thank you for doing all this testing. That is useful information to
>know. The next step (for you, me or anyone who has the time a
> It appears there are breaking changes to JAAS/GSS in newer JDKs ?
Thank you for doing all this testing. That is useful information to
know. The next step (for you, me or anyone who has the time and wants to
help) is to test subsequent Java 7 releases and see at which version it
stops working. I&#
David
> From: dmars...@outlook.com
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: RE: SPNEGO test configuration with Manager webapp
> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 23:40:06 +
>
> By the way Tomcat 8 was running on JDK :-
>
> C:\Windows\system32>java -version
>
x27;s and the Negotiate.
> Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 12:11:34 +0100
> From: a...@ice-sa.com
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SPNEGO test configuration with Manager webapp
>
> David Marsh wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Thank
fle in the past with success and used JAAS/GSS-API in Java thick
clients.
I made the IE settings you outlined but it seems to still prompt.
IE has win-tc01.kerbtest.local as a trusted site.
Enable Windows Integrated Authentication is on
Auto logon only in Intranet Zone is on
I've been using
th success and used JAAS/GSS-API in Java thick
clients.
I made the IE settings you outlined but it seems to still prompt.
IE has win-tc01.kerbtest.local as a trusted site.
Enable Windows Integrated Authentication is on
Auto logon only in Intranet Zone is on
I've been using Firefox to test and
David Marsh wrote:
Hi Mark,
Thanks that would be great !
Do you have a good mechanism to test and ensure kerberos token is passed to
tomcat and not NTLM token ?
I believe that I can answer that.
And the basic answer is no.
First the basic principle, valid for this and many many other areas
Hi Mark,
Thanks that would be great !
Do you have a good mechanism to test and ensure kerberos token is passed to
tomcat and not NTLM token ?
David
> Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:00:22 +
> From: ma...@apache.org
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SPNEGO test configuration
SS-APi ?
>
> http://sourceforge.net/p/spnego/discussion/1003769/thread/990913cc/?page=1
>
> Does Tomcat 8 work with NegoEx ?
>
> Is Windows 8.1 and Windows Server 2012 RC2 supported ?
My test environment is Windows 2008 R2 server and Windows 7. It is
certainly possibly security has been tight
rberos and Windows
Kerberos, depend on the versions of both Java and Windows Server..
Man, this thing is really a nightmare, isn't it ?
From: dmars...@outlook.com
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: RE: SPNEGO test configuration with Manager webapp
Does Tomcat 8 work with NegoEx ?
Is Windows 8.1 and Windows Server 2012 RC2 supported ?
many thanks
David
> From: dmars...@outlook.com
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: RE: SPNEGO test configuration with Manager webapp
> Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:18:11 +
>
> With
ead=1653>>> KdcAccessibility: remove win-dc01.kerbtest.local:88Looking for
keys for: HTTP/win-tc01.kerbtest.local@KERBTEST.LOCALAdded key: 17version:
15Added key: 18version: 15Added key: 23version: 15Found unsupported keytype (3)
for HTTP/win-tc01.kerbtest.local@KERBTEST.LOCALFound unsupported
)
at sun.security.krb5.internal.KDCRep.init(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.krb5.internal.ASRep.init(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.krb5.internal.ASRep.(Unknown Source)
... 5 more
> From: dmars...@outlook.co
bAsReqBuilder.send(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.krb5.KrbAsReqBuilder.action(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.krb5.internal.tools.Kinit.(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.krb5.internal.tools.Kinit.main(Unknown Source)
Caused by: KrbException: Identifier doesn't match e
utlook.com
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: RE: SPNEGO test configuration with Manager webapp
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 16:50:47 +
Its possible I guess, although I would not expect that.
The test is :-
Client Test Windows 8.1 VM with Firefox -> Tomcat Server Windows 8.1 VM
Firefox is not con
1 - 100 of 349 matches
Mail list logo
