Re: sneaky JDBC connection

2010-05-28 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yucca Nel, On 5/28/2010 11:34 AM, Yucca Nel wrote: >> So, what does happen if it doesn't redirect? > > It stays on the same page. Are you sure that your link is being followed at all? Does the browser issue a request? > I tried returning "home" from

Re: sneaky JDBC connection (was: THANK YOU ALL for help)

2010-05-28 Thread Mark Eggers
I apologize to the list, the last message got truncated and sent. I hit return twice while editing in Yahoo (normally edit off-line). OK - for the database leak. Use try / catch / finally blocks around all connection code (Hibernate or otherwise). I think someone posted boilerplate code to the

Re: sneaky JDBC connection (was: THANK YOU ALL for help)

2010-05-28 Thread Mark Eggers
--- On Fri, 5/28/10, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Problem #2: > >> I noticed another message in intellij complaianing that a mysql >> connecton was not closed but was closed by the container to prevent a >> memory leak. I have look everywhere in code and have closed the >> connection in a final

RE: sneaky JDBC connection (was: THANK YOU ALL for help)

2010-05-28 Thread Martin Gainty
n'aura pas n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni. > From: yucca...@live.co.za > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: Re:

Re: sneaky JDBC connection (was: THANK YOU ALL for help)

2010-05-28 Thread Yucca Nel
Hello and thank you... As a matter of interest there remains a bug that I was unable to get on top pf during development. This minor bug involves loggung out of my application where I need to refresh the page to show that the user has been logged out. The following were tried but failed re

Re: sneaky JDBC connection (was: THANK YOU ALL for help)

2010-05-28 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yucca Nel, On 5/28/2010 7:43 AM, Yucca Nel wrote: > I am using container managed security in two places This seems like two different problems. Problem #1: > As a matter of interest there > remains a bug that I was unable to get on top pf during de