> From: Josh Gooding [mailto:josh.good...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: slight problem with Tomcat and Httpd working together.
>
> Something that I am not understanding. If the context.xml files are
> truly ignored how can each of the companies be able to login?
You appear to have an
change in my configuration to be able to serve new projects under
>> the new displaced webapps folder, keeping my JDBC realm configuration, and
>> without having to restart tomcat each time I add one. Is it possible?
>>
>> It seems as though when I used the webapps folder in
_HOME I could
> add and remove folders in the webapps folder and I didn't have to restart
> tomcat each time.
> - J
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Caldarale, Charles R <
> chuck.caldar...@unisys.com> wrote:
>
>> > From: Josh Gooding [mailto:
osh.good...@gmail.com]
> > Subject: Re: slight problem with Tomcat and Httpd working together.
> >
> > *Wait a sec, illegal as in (will throw an exception) or just bad
> > practice?
>
> Illegal in that predictable behavior cannot be guaranteed. Tomcat is
> pretty goo
> From: Josh Gooding [mailto:josh.good...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: slight problem with Tomcat and Httpd working together.
>
> *Wait a sec, illegal as in (will throw an exception) or just bad
> practice?
Illegal in that predictable behavior cannot be guaranteed. Tomcat is pre
> I understand what the appBase is
>
> Perhaps you don't; the appBase attribute of a is the /default/
> deployment directory for its webapps; individual webapps are typically
> located *under* the appBase directory.
>
> > I don't understand why the docBase and appBase cannot be the
> > same declar
> From: Josh Gooding [mailto:josh.good...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: slight problem with Tomcat and Httpd working together.
>
> be SURE you get the correct version of the binaries for your version of
> Tomcat (32-bit / 64 bit).
Tomcat itself is pure Java, so it is neither 32- nor 6
r reading up on what the docBase is?
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Caldarale, Charles R <
chuck.caldar...@unisys.com> wrote:
> > From: Josh Gooding [mailto:josh.good...@gmail.com]
> > Subject: Re: slight problem with Tomcat and Httpd working together.
> >
> > HEY!!! I
> From: Josh Gooding [mailto:josh.good...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: slight problem with Tomcat and Httpd working together.
>
> HEY!!! It's in there and working.
Congratulations.
> INFO: Loaded APR based Apache Tomcat Native library 1.1.14.
That version is out of date; the
much. I really appreciate all of your help.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Caldarale, Charles R <
chuck.caldar...@unisys.com> wrote:
> > From: Josh Gooding [mailto:josh.good...@gmail.com]
> > Subject: Re: slight problem with Tomcat and Httpd working together.
> >
> &
> From: Josh Gooding [mailto:josh.good...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: slight problem with Tomcat and Httpd working together.
>
> Where do I put the DLL that I want to use?
In Tomcat's bin directory.
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIET
ding [mailto:josh.good...@gmail.com]
> > Subject: Re: slight problem with Tomcat and Httpd working together.
> >
> > I downloaded the APR for Tomcat. Dumb question, is there already a
> > binary distribution someplace?
>
> For Windows, yes; it's in the docs:
> http://t
Even better, I got what I was looking for. Where do I put the DLL that I
want to use? in wondows or in what tomcat directory?
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Josh Gooding wrote:
> Chris,
>
> My thanks to you and Chuck for clarifying that. The reason that I set up
> httpd on the machine is fo
> From: Josh Gooding [mailto:josh.good...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: slight problem with Tomcat and Httpd working together.
>
> I downloaded the APR for Tomcat. Dumb question, is there already a
> binary distribution someplace?
For Windows, yes; it's in the docs:
http://tomc
Chris,
My thanks to you and Chuck for clarifying that. The reason that I set up
httpd on the machine is for PHP and other possible languages. I was trying
to be a little more future thinking, however, since PHP is no longer an
option for these guys, I'll just nix the httpd server and move back i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josh,
On 8/8/2009 12:35 AM, Josh Gooding wrote:
> Since Tomcat is not the most efficient at
> serving static HTML pages
As Chuck suggests, this is an incorrect assumption. In recent testing I
performed myself, Tomcat 6.0.20's APR connector (also ment
> From: Josh Gooding [mailto:josh.good...@gmail.com]
> Subject: slight problem with Tomcat and Httpd working together.
Please don't cross-post.
> Since Tomcat is not the most efficient at serving static HTML pages
A misconception left over from the dark ages.
> I decided t
Interesting situation I have going on here
When running Tomcat 6.0.18 as the webserver I have 2 hosts configured one as
the .com and it is serving from the webapps folder just fine, the other is
serving to a subdomain perfectly. I couldn't be happier in how it is
running.
Here is where it ge
18 matches
Mail list logo
