Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2007-01-02 Thread Peter Coppens
t; From: "Hassan Schroeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tomcat Users List" > Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 2:39 PM > Subject: Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy > load > > >> On 12/30/06, Peter Coppens <[EMAIL

Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-30 Thread Martin Gainty
; To: "Tomcat Users List" Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 2:39 PM Subject: Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load > On 12/30/06, Peter Coppens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> That said, I am baffled by the fact that some connections take >15

Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-30 Thread Peter Coppens
>Are you referring to MySQL connection setup time? Or query time? Connection time (using a dbcp pool) >Either way, it certainly doesn't sound like a Tomcat problem... :-) Absolutely agree. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/session-getId-changes-during-doGet

Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-30 Thread Hassan Schroeder
On 12/30/06, Peter Coppens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That said, I am baffled by the fact that some connections take >15minutes. Are you referring to MySQL connection setup time? Or query time? Either way, it certainly doesn't sound like a Tomcat problem... :-) -- Hassan Schroeder ---

Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-30 Thread Peter Coppens
t;> >> > >> >> >> Do I understand it right, that you made it a reproduceable >> testcase? >> >> >> If so, can we have a look on it? >> >> >> >> >> >> thank you >> >> >> Leon >> >&g

Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-30 Thread David Smith
PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 6:31 AM Subject: Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load Do I understand it right, that you made it a reproduceable testcase? If so, can we have a look on it? thank you Leon On

Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-30 Thread Leon Rosenberg
-- >> > Le présent message électronique (y compris les pièces qui y sont >> annexées, >> > le cas échéant) s'adresse au destinataire indiqué et peut contenir des >> > renseignements de caractère privé ou confident

Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-30 Thread Peter Coppens
> some kind of race condition where a session that is being removed >> >>> because of >> >>> a timeout is also handling requests. >> >>> >> >>> The loggings indicate that a session is destroyed but then >> nevertheless >> >>> a

Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-30 Thread Leon Rosenberg
stribuer ou de le reproduire. > - Original Message - > From: "Leon Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tomcat Users List" > Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 6:31 AM > Subject: Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy > lo

Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-30 Thread Peter Coppens
-- >>> > To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> -- >>> View th

Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-29 Thread Martin Gainty
signalons qu'il est strictement interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire. - Original Message - From: "Leon Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 6:31 AM Subject: Re: session#getId changes

Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-29 Thread Peter Coppens
doing wrong. >> >> Would you (or anyone else) have any other comments on this? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Peter >> >> >> >> Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> > >> >> From: Peter Coppens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Sub

RE: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-29 Thread Tim Lucia
> -Original Message- > From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 8:25 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy > load > > > From: Peter Coppens [mailto:[E

Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-29 Thread Leon Rosenberg
n this? Thanks, Peter Caldarale, Charles R wrote: > >> From: Peter Coppens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under >> heavy load >> >> THe problem I run into is that, under heavy load, during the >> doGet

RE: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-29 Thread Peter Coppens
: users@tomcat.apache.org > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/session-getId-changes-during-doGet-invocation-under-heavy-load-tf2892448.html#a8085181 Sent from

RE: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-28 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Peter Coppens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under > heavy load > > THe problem I run into is that, under heavy load, during the > doGet invocation for the login request the session attached > to the request is

session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-28 Thread Peter Coppens
ected behavior or whether someone perhaps has ideas how to fix this. Any help or suggestions warmly welcomed, Peter -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/session-getId-changes-during-doGet-invocation-under-heavy-load-tf2892448.html#a8081064 Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing