> On 2025 Apr 15, at 09:32, Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
>
> Chenjp,
>
> On 4/14/25 5:46 AM, Justin Chen wrote:
>> Main branch: Receive unexpected 400 for curl put with content-range header
>> value "bytes 0-0/1" and
>> -d c.
>> PR submitted.
>
> I think HTTP 400 is the correct response for
Chenjp,
On 4/14/25 5:46 AM, Justin Chen wrote:
Main branch: Receive unexpected 400 for curl put with content-range header value
"bytes 0-0/1" and
-d c.
PR submitted.
I think HTTP 400 is the correct response for this. You are saying "I'd
like to update bytes 0-0 (a zero-width update) with th
hi,
Main branch: Receive unexpected 400 for curl put with content-range header
value "bytes 0-0/1" and
-d c.
PR submitted.
Regards,
Chenjp
Thanks for replies yes we do have mismatch using jaxrs-Jersey Api and
Tomcat Filter causes issues so when choose to use Jersey filters it works
fine and makes sense after seeing the responses.
On Tue, 17 Dec, 2024, 12:51 am Christopher Schultz, <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> Mark,
>
> O
Mark,
On 12/16/24 5:52 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 16/12/2024 10:10, anand raj wrote:
Hi all,
In Tomcat 11 a jersey Api multipart-formdata is registered with Multipart
feature.Also an inbound filter in front reading request.getparamater
fails
with "unable to process parts as no multi-part conf
On 16/12/2024 10:10, anand raj wrote:
Hi all,
In Tomcat 11 a jersey Api multipart-formdata is registered with Multipart
feature.Also an inbound filter in front reading request.getparamater fails
with "unable to process parts as no multi-part configuration has been
provided."
In Tomcat 11 it fail
Hi all,
In Tomcat 11 a jersey Api multipart-formdata is registered with Multipart
feature.Also an inbound filter in front reading request.getparamater fails
with "unable to process parts as no multi-part configuration has been
provided."
In Tomcat 11 it fails.
In Tomcat 10 same setup works continu
levels to ALL.
Thanks for bringing this to our attention.
Mark
Thanks,
Andreas
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Mark Thomas
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. August 2024 09:58
An: users@tomcat.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Problem getting logging from TldScanner
WARNING: Do not click links or open
Betreff: Re: Problem getting logging from TldScanner
WARNING: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the source
of the email and know the contents are safe.
On 05/08/2024 11:07, Döscher, Andreas (ESI) wrote:
> Moin,
> I wanted to check the TLD scanner and
On 05/08/2024 11:07, Döscher, Andreas (ESI) wrote:
Moin,
I wanted to check the TLD scanner and placed*
org.apache.jasper.servlet.TldScanner.level = FINE
in logging.properties, but under Tomcat 10.1.25 and Tomcat 9.0.91 I get only
05-Aug-2024 10:43:29.958 INFO [main]
org.apache.jasper.servlet.
Moin,
I wanted to check the TLD scanner and placed*
org.apache.jasper.servlet.TldScanner.level = FINE
in logging.properties, but under Tomcat 10.1.25 and Tomcat 9.0.91 I get only
05-Aug-2024 10:43:29.958 INFO [main]
org.apache.jasper.servlet.TldScanner.scanJars At least one JAR was scanned for
Alan,
On 8/1/24 05:00, Alan Masters wrote:
I have configured apache-tomcat-9.0.91 to run as localhost:8080 on
Windows 11.
Once I have executed the startup.bat, and open localhost:8080 and get:
If you're seeing this, you've successfully installed Tomcat.
Congratulations
However freque
Hi Alan,
On 01.08.24 11:00, Alan Masters wrote:
I have configured apache-tomcat-9.0.91 to run as localhost:8080 on
Windows 11.
Once I have executed the startup.bat, and open localhost:8080 and get:
If you're seeing this, you've successfully installed Tomcat.
Congratulations
However freq
I have configured apache-tomcat-9.0.91 to run as localhost:8080 on
Windows 11.
Once I have executed the startup.bat, and open localhost:8080 and get:
If you're seeing this, you've successfully installed Tomcat.
Congratulations
However frequently when closing down with shutdown.bat and re
February 2024 19:51
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Need help for a problem on migrating from Tomcat-8 to Tomcat-9
[You don't often get email from ch...@christopherschultz.net. Learn why this is
important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
Rajib,
On 2/26/24 23:43, Saha,
of the local machine.
This is a huge red-flag from a security standpoint.
-chris
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas
Sent: 26 February 2024 14:23
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Need help for a problem on migrating from Tomcat-8 to Tomcat-9
[You don't often get email fro
al Message-
From: Mark Thomas
Sent: 26 February 2024 14:23
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Need help for a problem on migrating from Tomcat-8 to Tomcat-9
[You don't often get email from ma...@apache.org. Learn why this is important
at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
O
On 26/02/2024 06:11, Saha, Rajib wrote:
Hi Experts,
In our product, we are using Tomcat [OriginalFileName: prunsrv.exe] for
creating a service[Say, Service-A]. It's a huge product running in market for
last 20 years.
We are in progress of moving from Tomcat-8 to tomcat-9.
When we are creatin
Hi Experts,
In our product, we are using Tomcat [OriginalFileName: prunsrv.exe] for
creating a service[Say, Service-A]. It's a huge product running in market for
last 20 years.
We are in progress of moving from Tomcat-8 to tomcat-9.
When we are creating the Service-A with Tomcat-8 [tomcat8.exe
Hi,
I am in the process of migrating a large application from Tomcat9 to
Tomcat10. While we have fixed the javax->jakarta issues in our code
directly, we still need to specify jakartaConverter=TOMCAT to make the
application work correctly.
My question is now: does the converter log its work some
On 9/8/23 8:34 AM, Ivano Luberti wrote:
I had similar problem with mod_security installed on servers and apache
used as proxy.
mod_security intercept the request and if considers it suspicious
generate a 403 error
Found it.
It's in the AWS WAF. A rule called
I had similar problem with mod_security installed on servers and apache
used as proxy.
mod_security intercept the request and if considers it suspicious
generate a 403 error
Il 08/09/2023 17:25, James H. H. Lampert ha scritto:
Yesterday, I discovered that our Tomcat-based webapp (running on
y hypothesis is that the 403 is coming from an AWS firewall
rule, because that was the cause of our last 403 problem.
But is there anything in Tomcat that could be doing this?
--
JHHL
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr.
Helge,
On 7/25/23 05:24, Wiemann, Helge (ESI) wrote:
we have a problem that we have set the tomcat timeout to 10 minutes. But
after a successful login with a realm, the user is automatically logged
out, sometimes after one minute, sometimes other times.
I have downloaded the source code
ve a magic trick where they'll find the implementations for
you and set the breakpoints on the implementations as they're loaded.
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 4:25 AM Wiemann, Helge (ESI)
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> we have a problem that we have set the tomcat timeout to 10 minu
Hi all,
we have a problem that we have set the tomcat timeout to 10 minutes. But after
a successful login with a realm, the user is automatically logged out,
sometimes after one minute, sometimes other times.
I have downloaded the source code, want to set a breakpoint. Does anybody know
a
Helge,
On 7/22/23 11:03, Wiemann, Helge (ESI) wrote:
we are using Tomcat 9 and the still the JDBC Realm for authentication.
Our starting URL (which is protected) ends with “/boot1#index”
The form authentication is then processed through the common url
j_security_check.
But after a successfu
On 7/22/23 12:03, Mark Thomas wrote:
Your target URL is invalid. No user agent should be sending the
fragment (#index) part of the URL. At best Tomcat will ignore it. Later
versions may even reject it (I have a memory of that but don't have easy
acces to the source code to check right now).
22 Jul 2023 17:03:50 Wiemann, Helge (ESI)
:
Hi all,
we are using Tomcat 9 and the still the JDBC Realm for authentication.
Our starting URL (which is protected) ends with “/boot1#index”
The form authentication is then processed through the common url
j_security_check.
But after a successf
Hi all,
we are using Tomcat 9 and the still the JDBC Realm for authentication.
Our starting URL (which is protected) ends with "/boot1#index"
The form authentication is then processed through the common url
j_security_check.
But after a successful login, he is not redirecting to "boot1#index" bu
is to underline that as predictable it was not a problem
with tomcat
Thanks to everyone spent time into this, especially Chris
Il 27/06/2023 16:35, Christopher Schultz ha scritto:
Ivano,
On 6/27/23 09:15, Ivano Luberti wrote:
We had another Linux server that should have been identical to the
Ivano,
On 6/27/23 09:15, Ivano Luberti wrote:
We had another Linux server that should have been identical to the one
where the problem was occuring. Tested the same software on that without
the issue.
So we cloned the latter and replaced the former.
>
Now everything works as expec
Hi Chris, thank you for your dedication.
We had another Linux server that should have been identical to the one
where the problem was occuring. Tested the same software on that without
the issue.
So we cloned the latter and replaced the former.
Now everything works as expected.
Before the
Ivano,
On 6/8/23 06:10, Ivano Luberti wrote:
Hi, all I have the following problem.
[snip]
My guess is that looking at the code in this general area would be
helpful. If you are able to add debug logging in there to spoit-out some
of the crypto configuration being used, I'm sure it
Hi Chris, thanks for that.
No, don't make nay configuration regarding use of any algorithm.
I launch Java with same options in tomcat and in the stand alone client
and I get two different behaviours
Il 23/06/2023 21:51, Christopher Schultz ha scritto:
Ivano,
On 6/8/23 06:10, Ivano Luberti
Ivano,
On 6/8/23 06:10, Ivano Luberti wrote:
My web application executes an SSL connection but fails with the
following exception
AxisFault: java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException: Error constructing
implementation (algorithm: Default, provider: SunJSSE, class:
sun.security.ssl.SSLContextIm
rtup.sh contain some option that could create a difference with
respect to this matter?
Il 08/06/2023 16:39, Thomas Hoffmann (Speed4Trade GmbH) ha scritto:
Hello Ivano,
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ivano Luberti
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Juni 2023 12:10
An:users@tomcat.apache.org
Be
Hello Ivano,
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Ivano Luberti
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Juni 2023 12:10
> An: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Betreff: problem with SSL connection
> java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException: Error constructing implementation
>
> Hi,
Hi, all I have the following problem.
My web application executes an SSL connection but fails with the
following exception
AxisFault: java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException: Error constructing
implementation (algorithm: Default, provider: SunJSSE, class:
sun.security.ssl.SSLContextImpl
nitializer)
received MyApp in the 'classes' set of 'onStartup' method only when MyApp
is bundled into a dependency.
So far, the problem seems to relate to
the jakarta.servlet.ServletContainerInitializer implementation.
It is a change since servlet 3.0 spec. Is it intended by serv
Jaebo,
On 1/21/22 06:42, Jaebo Nah wrote:
Thank you for your help, I found the problem.
Only one certificate may be contained in the KeyStore file.
I had several certificates in the KeyStore file, and the Tomcat server
10.x always got the first certificate in the KeyStore file.
With Tomcat 9.x
7; set of 'onStartup' method only when MyApp
is bundled into a dependency.
So far, the problem seems to relate to
the jakarta.servlet.ServletContainerInitializer implementation.
It is a change since servlet 3.0 spec. Is it intended by servlet 5.0 spec
or is it a bug in Tomcat 10.0.16 implementation ?
Dear all,
Thank you for your help, I found the problem.
Only one certificate may be contained in the KeyStore file.
I had several certificates in the KeyStore file, and the Tomcat server 10.x
always got the first certificate in the KeyStore file.
With Tomcat 9.x you could specify the key alias
Hi Mark,
I want to use 3 Tomcat on the Linux Server .
For each Ip (DNS ALIAS) one Tomcat.
I use this configuration with Tomcat 9.x and it works fine.
Now I start following sever.xml but the Problem is the Same.
Rgds
correct Domian Name and IP (sorry for the confusion)
10.100.142.30
be found at
https://www.pfandbriefbank.com/en/privacy/translate-to-english-europaeische-datenschutz-grundvero.html
From: Jaebo Nah
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 10:30 AM
To: 'users@tomcat.apache.org'
Subject: tomcat-10.0.x Problem https multiple IP
Dear all,
I want to use a Tomcat a
On 21/01/2022 09:29, Jaebo Nah wrote:
Dear all,
I want to use a Tomcat apache-tomcat-10.0.14 with https .
The Linux Server have multiple ip Address with different Domain Names
10.100.142.30 = one.domain.loc
10.100.142.31 = two.domain.loc
10.100.142.32 = three.domain.loc
When I try
Dear Jaebo,
On 21.01.22 10:29, Jaebo Nah wrote:
> 10.100.142.31 = two.domain.loc
>
>
> address=" two.domain.loc"
>
> SSLEnabled="true" defaultSSLHostConfigName="10.100.142.32" >
>
> protocols="TLSv1.2,+TLSv1.1,+TLSv1">
>
>
Above, I only left the lines from your mail that
Dear all,
I want to use a Tomcat apache-tomcat-10.0.14 with https .
The Linux Server have multiple ip Address with different Domain Names
10.100.142.30 = one.domain.loc
10.100.142.31 = two.domain.loc
10.100.142.32 = three.domain.loc
When I try to connect to the Tomcat with https://two
10 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This
Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?
Eric,
On 12/30/21 19:03, Eric Robinson wrote:
If I want to ignore the vendor's recommendation and try connection
pooling anyway, is that something I can enable with a config file
setting,
to me soon hopefully.
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz
> Sent: Monday, January 3, 2022 9:10 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This
> Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?
>
> Eric,
>
> On 12/30/21 19:0
n
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2021 12:00 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This
Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?
Chris,
Not pooling connections will very likely negatively affect performance.
When you say "they ... have an issue with connection po
ric Robinson >>> <mailto:eric.robin...@psmnv.com>>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2021 12:00 PM
>>>> To: Tomcat Users List >>> <mailto:users@tomcat.apache.org>>
>>>> Subject: RE: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This
>>>
12:00 PM
> >> To: Tomcat Users List >> <mailto:users@tomcat.apache.org>>
> >> Subject: RE: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This
> >> Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?
> >>
> >> Chris,
> >>
> >>> Not pooling connections
ber 30, 2021 12:00 PM
>> To: Tomcat Users List > <mailto:users@tomcat.apache.org>>
>> Subject: RE: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This
>> Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?
>>
>> Chris,
>>
>>> Not pooling connections will very likely negative
y, December 30, 2021 12:00 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This
> Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?
>
> Chris,
>
> > Not pooling connections will very likely negatively affect performance.
> >
> > When you say "
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2021 12:00 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This
> > Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?
> >
> > But they do not get a corresponding database instance?
> >
>
> They do. Each tomcat ins
> José,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: José Cornado
> > Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2021 12:00 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This
> > Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?
> >
> >
José,
> -Original Message-
> From: José Cornado
> Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2021 12:00 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This
> Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?
>
> But they do not get a corresponding database instance?
But they do not get a corresponding database instance?
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 10:51 AM Eric Robinson
wrote:
> José,
>
> > Is this setup going to be open to the world or just a big organization?
> A big
> > organization would put a cap on the number of users. Then maybe they
> > could divide tho
Chris,
> Not pooling connections will very likely negatively affect performance.
>
> When you say "they ... have an issue with connection pooling" do you mean
> that they have a technical problem, or do you mean that there is some ill-
> conceived policy against the
"most
> people" don't need that kind of concurrency.
>
A fair question. The load is spread over multiple database servers, and they
are capable of handling the connection count. The problem we've encountered in
the past was on the client side, where it would exhaust the av
Stefan,
> A third option could be to add something between database client and
> server. Something on layer 4 like multiple HAProxy servers or simple NAT
> gateways. Or more complex on layer 7 specfic products like ProxySQL or
> MaxScale. They could even pool connections and reduce the load on the
José,
> Is this setup going to be open to the world or just a big organization? A big
> organization would put a cap on the number of users. Then maybe they
> could divide those between the tomcat instances thus the db server.
>
It's a SaaS solution, where each customer organization gets its own
tances on the
app server. When we increase the count to 500, the problem will reappear unless
we can figure out a way to distribute client port usage. That's why I came up
with the idea of using multiple source IPs on the app server. I am new to
network namespaces, and thought that migh
Hi Simon,
> I guess the database is not on the Tomcat host, otherwise you could connect
> via unix domain socket to avoid the limitations of TCP port numbers.
>
> Otherwise I think you could run a db proxy where your Tomcat clients
> connect locally via unix domain socket and the proxy relays the
Eric,
On 12/29/21 19:23, Eric Robinson wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mark Eggers
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2021 6:18 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This
Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?
Eric:
On 12/29/2021 1:04 PM, Eric Robinson
decade, we know
that we could potentially host 500 or more separate tomcat instances on
the same server without running into performance problems. So now we
want to make it 500 parallel instances.
Here’s the problem. When tomcat initiates an outbound connection (for
example, with Connector/J
Am 30.12.2021 um 12:24 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 29/12/2021 21:04, Eric Robinson wrote:
My question is, is there a better way?
I can only think of variations on a theme.
The ~64k limit assumes client IP, server IP and server port remain
constant. i.e. just client port is varying.
That sug
Is this setup going to be open to the world or just a big organization? A
big organization would put a cap on the number of users. Then maybe they
could divide those between the tomcat instances thus the db server.
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 4:24 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 29/12/2021 21:04, Eric
On 29/12/2021 21:04, Eric Robinson wrote:
My question is, is there a better way?
I can only think of variations on a theme.
The ~64k limit assumes client IP, server IP and server port remain
constant. i.e. just client port is varying.
That suggests there is a single IP for the database s
decade, we know that we could
> potentially host 500 or more separate tomcat instances on the same server
> without running into performance problems. So now we want to make it 500
> parallel instances.
>
>
> Here's the problem. When tomcat initiates an outbound connection
> Your problem seems to be in the client-to-db server side of things. Not
> tomcat as a server.
>
In the context of this question, tomcat is the client.
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 2:11 PM Eric Robinson
> wrote:
>
> > We want to run a large number of tomcat inst
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Eggers
> Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2021 6:18 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This
> Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?
>
> Eric:
>
> On 12/29/2021 1:04 PM, Eric Robinson wro
the past decade, we know that we could potentially host 500 or more separate
tomcat instances on the same server without running into performance problems.
So now we want to make it 500 parallel instances.
Here's the problem. When tomcat initiates an outbound connection (for exam
Your problem seems to be in the client-to-db server side of things. Not
tomcat as a server.
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 2:11 PM Eric Robinson
wrote:
> We want to run a large number of tomcat instances on the same server
> without virtualization or containerization. Each instance is execute
host 500 or more separate
tomcat instances on the same server without running into performance problems.
So now we want to make it 500 parallel instances.
Here's the problem. When tomcat initiates an outbound connection (for example,
with Connector/J to query a backend database) it est
the problem.
Here is our base pre-Tomcat upgrade configuration which was working for both
LDAP user authentication and with Kerberos-enabled authentication (e.g. with
the Tomcat Manager app).
* Tomcat 9.0.30 running on Windows Server 2019
* Microsoft OpenJDK packaging, build 11.0.12
Hello,
I wanted to report an issue with Tomcat LDAP user authentication lookups with
Tomcat container Kerberos security that I found in our environment when
upgrading to version Tomcat 9.0.52 from 9.0.30 and what configuration settings
bypassed the problem.
Here is our base pre-Tomcat upgrade
Just to note - this was fixed in the latest release of Tomcat and I'm
humming along again ..
But it would be good to track down what is happening to help folks who
can't just upgrade like me.
Side note - you'll recall that in the last year or so I've been on an
upgrade tear from 7.x to present in
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 01:32:47PM -0600, John Dale wrote:
> Page loads fine.
>
> Other pages load fine.
>
> SSL handshakes are working until ..
>
> An Ajax post with a base64 encoded image in the data.
>
> I debugged up to the request and it's fine.
>
> I debugged the server and it's not reac
John,
On 5/28/21 20:17, John Dale wrote:
ran apt-get install tomcat9 and it upgraded these packages:
libtomcat9-java tomcat9 tomcat9-common
Still did not resolve the issue, however.
Looking for a guide to manually upgrade a package installed with apt-get.
>
> [repeated from elsewhere in the
I upgraded DB2DOM to 9.0.41 manually, updated systemd and consolidated
all the files that were distributed by apt-get.
Once apps were back up and running, still no luck.
Upgraded DB2DOM to 9.0.46, same result.
Upgraded to 10.0.6, globally searched and replaced javax.websocket and
javax.servlet a
ran apt-get install tomcat9 and it upgraded these packages:
libtomcat9-java tomcat9 tomcat9-common
Still did not resolve the issue, however.
Looking for a guide to manually upgrade a package installed with apt-get.
Suggestions?
On 5/28/21, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> John,
>
> On 5/28/21 15
The thick plottens.
When I do apt-cache show tomcat9:
Package: tomcat9
Version: 9.0.31-1~deb10u4
...
S .. simple and good way to upgrade this via apt-get?
Or will I have to manually be overwriting stuff (yuck).
John
On 5/28/21, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> John,
>
> On 5/28/21 15:32,
definitely related to the post size ..
smaller images work, larger images do not work, but the larger images
are only 500k, so it's not a maxpostsize issue.
I'm running apache-tomcat-9.0.41, so this shouldn't apply:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63050276/tomcat-9-long-https-request
John
John,
On 5/28/21 15:32, John Dale wrote:
I debugged the server and it's not reaching my component.
>
>
Request post is around 300K.
Tomcat 9 on a raspberry pi 4 (w00t!).
Maybe you are still just waiting around for that tiny CPU to run all
that bytecode.
/snark
Seriously, though, I'd b
Page loads fine.
Other pages load fine.
SSL handshakes are working until ..
An Ajax post with a base64 encoded image in the data.
I debugged up to the request and it's fine.
I debugged the server and it's not reaching my component.
Tomcat is killing the connection for some reason.
Thought it
Hi Christopher
Enclosed is the stacktrace of the tomcat (localhost)
03-Mar-2021 15:57:15.221 SEVERE [http-nio-8080-exec-10]
org.apache.catalina.realm.JNDIRealm.authenticate Exception performing
authentication
javax.naming.NamingException: [LDAP: error code 1 - 04DC: LdapErr:
DSID-0C0907E
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz
> Sent: Donnerstag, 20. Mai 2021 18:37
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: JNDI ldaps Problem with SSO
>
> Susan,
>
> On 5/18/21 16:58, susan.w...@swisscom.com wrote:
> > When we are using plain ldap 3268, a
ce and not just the message?
-chris
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz
Sent: Dienstag, 18. Mai 2021 18:02
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: JNDI ldaps Problem with SSO
Susan,
On 5/18/21 09:43, susan.w...@swisscom.com wrote:
Hi all
apache-tomcat-8.0.36
java ve
:
# extended LDIF
#
# LDAPv3
# base with scope subtree
# filter: (objectclass=*)
# requesting: ALL
# Organization, Schema, Configuration, bcintra.ch
We think, ssl-handshake is fine but bind is failing. Why?
Thank you
Susan
> -Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Schultz
> Sent: Die
Susan,
On 5/18/21 09:43, susan.w...@swisscom.com wrote:
Hi all
apache-tomcat-8.0.36
java version "1.8.0_281"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_281-b09)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.281-b09, mixed mode)
We are having a problem with our Single sign On co
Hi all
apache-tomcat-8.0.36
java version "1.8.0_281"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_281-b09)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.281-b09, mixed mode)
We are having a problem with our Single sign On config.
When using ldap - all works well.
When switiching to l
.* imports and
compiled your project against the Jakarta APIs (servlet-api.jar etc
provided by Tomcat 10) then the problem is that Commons FileUpload is
written for Java EE 8 (with javax.* packages) but you are using Jakarta
EE 9 (with jakarta.* packages).
Commons FileUpload is working on a Jakarta
ясова
От: Orendt, John
Отправлено: 15 мая 2021 г. 1:17
Кому: users@tomcat.apache.org
Тема: Tomcat 10 and import org.apache.commons.fileupload.FileItem problem
Hi
I found sample code for an UploadServlet with these imports
import org.apache.commons.fileupload.FileItem;
i
Hi
I found sample code for an UploadServlet with these imports
import org.apache.commons.fileupload.FileItem;
import org.apache.commons.fileupload.disk.DiskFileItemFactory;
import org.apache.commons.fileupload.servlet.ServletFileUpload;
This worked well with Tomcat 9.
However, when I switched t
there maybe another debug Option for the ldap?
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> > Susan
> >
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Brian Wolfe
> > > Sent: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2021 17:00
> > > To: Tomcat Users Lis
aps with port 3269 fails
>
> Is there maybe another debug Option for the ldap?
>
> Thank you
>
> Susan
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Brian Wolfe
> > Sent: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2021 17:00
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subje
.
So the search itself seems to be fine.
Only ldaps with port 3269 fails
Is there maybe another debug Option for the ldap?
Thank you
Susan
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Wolfe
> Sent: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2021 17:00
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re
m.
> Could it be, that a ssl config is necessary too?
>
> Thank you
>
> Susan
>
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Bill Stewart
> > Sent: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2021 16:04
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: JNDI ldaps Problem wit
1 - 100 of 6860 matches
Mail list logo
