esday, April 15, 2009 10:36 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: Re: Help with mod_jk and Apache 2.2
Security Management wrote:
> Andre,
>
> I removed the deprecated lines from the workers.properties, and added the
> JkMountCopy that you indicated.
>
> Things work now.
Hi André,
+1 to your forthcoming documentation contributions.
Great explanation.
Regards,
Rainer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Security Management wrote:
Andre,
I removed the deprecated lines from the workers.properties, and added the
JkMountCopy that you indicated.
Things work now.
The strange thing is, I'm not using a virtual host (name or IP based), it's
the canned apache installation for Fedora.
Maybe this is wha
ll do some more testing and see
exactly what needs to go where to not need the copy, but I don't have time
at the moment.
Thanks,
Mike.
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 6:06 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Help with m
ce-sa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 4:32 PM
To: Security Management
Subject: Re: Help with mod_jk and Apache 2.2
Antonio, ya me has perdido.
Would you mind re-posting the content of your 3 files, as they are now ?
Alternatively :
- comment the line "JkMountFile"
- add instead the
worker.list=worker1
worker.worker1.type=ajp13
worker.worker1.host=localhost
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 4:32 PM
To: Security Management
Subject: Re: Help with mod_jk and Apache 2.2
Antonio, ya me has perdido.
Would you mind re-po
and tell us if that works.
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 4:19 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Help with mod_jk and Apache 2.2
Security Management wrote:
Yeah, I saw that, and it's now:
/smc-appsuite|/*=worker1
OK, I was switching the name to make sure the logs switched the name and
stuff.
It's consistent in the file.
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 4:19 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Help with mod_jk and Apache 2.2
Sec
een questions, it becomes hard to follow.
Still not working, though. Same problem. Any more ideas?
Thanks for the help,
Mike.
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 10:03 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Help with mod_j
2009 10:03 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Help with mod_jk and Apache 2.2
Antonio Vidal Ferrer wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I guess the = sign in your jkmount file is wrong.
> It should say:
> /appsuite worker1
>
Not according to this :
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/refe
Antonio Vidal Ferrer wrote:
Hi.
I guess the = sign in your jkmount file is wrong.
It should say:
/appsuite worker1
Not according to this :
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/uriworkermap.html
-
To unsub
Hi.
I guess the = sign in your jkmount file is wrong.
It should say:
/appsuite worker1
Best,
Toni
-Original Message-
From: Security Management [mailto:list-subscripti...@secmgmt.com]
Sent: martes, 14 de abril de 2009 15:29
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: Help with
Security Management wrote:
So, I have Tomcat 5.5, apache 2.2 on a linux 32 bit machine. Tomcat and my
webapp work great, I just can't seem to get the connector working. Sorry if
this is a basic question, but even with the debugging on I can't see what is
wrong. I have listed 3 files here, my h
So, I have Tomcat 5.5, apache 2.2 on a linux 32 bit machine. Tomcat and my
webapp work great, I just can't seem to get the connector working. Sorry if
this is a basic question, but even with the debugging on I can't see what is
wrong. I have listed 3 files here, my httpd config, my workers.prope
Rainer Jung wrote:
But: why do you plan to use different Hosts in Tomcat at all? Unless you
need to set Host based settings for different webapps to different
values or you want to deploy different webapps under the same name, you
can put all webapps into the default Host.
Or do you use multiple
On 08.04.2009 20:39, André Warnier wrote:
> Jordan Michaels wrote:
>> > Another possibility is having a single source for your host setup,
>> with some kind of script/program to generate both the httpd and Tomcat
>> config files from that. (That could turn out to be a marketable
>> product.)
>>
Jordan Michaels wrote:
> Another possibility is having a single source for your host setup,
with some kind of script/program to generate both the httpd and Tomcat
config files from that. (That could turn out to be a marketable product.)
>
The organisation of the Tomcat documentation is some
hanks folks!
Warm regards,
Jordan Michaels
Vivio Technologies
http://www.viviotech.net/
Open BlueDragon Steering Committee
Adobe Solution Provider
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Jordan Michaels [mailto:jor...@viviotech.net]
Subject: tomcat, mod_jk, and apache
I'm using mod_jk with
> From: Jordan Michaels [mailto:jor...@viviotech.net]
> Subject: tomcat, mod_jk, and apache
>
> I'm using mod_jk with apache and I was wondering if it would be
> possible to configure mod_jk in a way that I wouldn't have to
> specify the entries in Tomcat's
André Warnier wrote:
Jordan Michaels wrote:
Hey Folks,
I'm using mod_jk with apache and I was wondering if it would be
possible to configure mod_jk in a way that I wouldn't have to specify
the entries in Tomcat's server.xml file in addition to apache.
It's not terribly difficult to enter in
Jordan Michaels wrote:
Hey Folks,
I'm using mod_jk with apache and I was wondering if it would be possible
to configure mod_jk in a way that I wouldn't have to specify the
entries in Tomcat's server.xml file in addition to apache. It's not
terribly difficult to enter in host information in b
Hey Folks,
I'm using mod_jk with apache and I was wondering if it would be possible
to configure mod_jk in a way that I wouldn't have to specify the
entries in Tomcat's server.xml file in addition to apache. It's not
terribly difficult to enter in host information in both places, but it
woul
Christopher Schultz wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
2. Is is okay to have connection_pool_size=1 for my workers? The docs
suggest to me that it /must be/ set to 1 if I'm using prefork MPM.
OK, I see, that our wording is still not clear. What we try to tell the
users:
I think I get it. Basically,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rainer,
Rainer Jung wrote:
>> I still have a few questions, though:
>>
>> 1. I still get the JkShmFile error (didn't specify such a directive;
>>should I? If I don't need it, can I disable the feature to avoid
>>the error message?)
>
> I'm af
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rainer,
So, I dumped my configuration entirely and tried to get something served
from somewhere other than the default virtual host.
It turns out that the default virtual host does not set a ServerName,
which apparently r
Going to infinity+1:
I would guess: the redundant log lines come from virtual servers.
Okay. I don't believe I have more than one virtual server, so I would
have expected maybe a maximum of two "initialized" messages.
See below.
All of my JkMounts are in a single VirtualHost, and they are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rainer,
So, I dumped my configuration entirely and tried to get something served
from somewhere other than the default virtual host.
It turns out that the default virtual host does not set a ServerName,
which apparently really confuses Apache httpd 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rainer,
Thanks for the reply.
Rainer Jung wrote:
> I would guess: the redundant log lines come from virtual servers.
Okay. I don't believe I have more than one virtual server, so I would
have expected maybe a maximum of two "initialized" messages.
Hi Chris,
Christopher Schultz wrote:
Strange... it looks like mod_jk is initializing itself more than once. I
even tried the binary available online for Apache httpd 2.2.4 (2.2.6
wasn't available), and it appears to be giving me the same results.
I would guess: the redundant log lines come fro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
I changed my JkLogLevel to debug and here's the output I get when I
request a URL that should be mapped to a Tomcat instance:
[Tue Sep 18 10:52:36.989 2007] [4317:3080799920] [debug]
map_uri_to_worker::jk_uri_worker_map.c (597): Attempting to ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All (especially mod_jk folks),
I recently upgraded one of my servers to Apache httpd 2.2 and
(predictably) my existing hand-built mod_jk.so library was "garbled",
requiring me to re-compile. After a re-build (and upgrade from 1.2.23 to
1.2.25), it app
"Dirk Koehler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for some documentation how unix domain sockets can be used
> with apache/tomcat/mod_jk...anybody who uses this environment?
>
The current mod_jk doesn't currently support domain sockets. You would h
Hi,
I'm looking for some documentation how unix domain sockets can be used
with apache/tomcat/mod_jk...anybody who uses this environment?
thx, dirk
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
***end of server.xml ***
Tom
Original message
>Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 07:54:15 -0500
>From: Christopher Schultz <>
>Subject: Re: mod_jk and apache problem
>To: Tomcat Users List
>
>Tom,
>
>Tom Miller wrote:
>> The foll
cat Users List'" ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 4:28 PM
Subject: RE: mod_jk and apache problem
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 3:49 PM
> To: Tomcat Users Lis
-Original Message-
From: Tom Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 3:49 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: mod_jk and apache problem
The following said that if client click on links that
including *.jsp then forward the requested to tomcat
using worker2
Tom,
Tom Miller wrote:
> The following said that if client click on links that including *.jsp
> then forward the requested to tomcat using worker2. But where will
> it go when the traffic forward to tomcat. If one have more than one
> context under Tomcat. How does it know which one to go from
The following said that if client click on links that
including *.jsp then forward the requested to tomcat
using worker2. But where will it go when the traffic
forward to tomcat. If one have more than one context
under Tomcat. How does it know which one to go from the
three. for example: of
Steve Ochani wrote:
Date sent: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:34:38 -0300
From: Mansour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: mod_jk and apache
To: Mansour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Copies to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mansour <[
Date sent: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:34:38 -0300
From: Mansour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: mod_jk and apache
To: Mansour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Copies to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mansour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Date sent: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 03:05:11 -0300
From: Mansour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mod_jk and apache
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Send reply to: Tomcat Users List
> Hi Every body:
> I have gone through ever
Hi Every body:
I have gone through everything I can before posting a messga eto this
mailing list.
I can not find a good detailed documentation about configuring and
integrating tomcat with apache.
Here's what I did so far:
I installed tomcat and mod_jk succefully. I was able to test tomcat,
h
42 matches
Mail list logo
