Hi.
Some responses in the text. The responses are based on my experience, not on any thorough
inspection of the code.
Maybe first, a basic note : from the point of view of Apache httpd, mod_jk is an internal
"content generator" or "response handler". Apache "runs" mod_jk as an internal modu
All,
We have apache running on Windows Web Server 2008 R2, fronting tomcat. We
use mod_jk to connect. We see these kind of log messages in mod_jk logs.
What do they mean?
[Thu Jul 28 12:30:56 2011] [14264:10144] [info] jk_ajp_common.c (1882):
Writing to client aborted or client network problems
[
Subject: mod_jk and tomcat virtual hosts not connecting
Hi, First of all I would like to mention that this is my first
post on
this list, I hope that this question is sent in the right place.
I have tried finding a solution for my problem, but it
, July 27, 2010 7:11 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: mod_jk and tomcat virtual hosts not connecting
Hi, First of all I would like to mention that this is my first post on
this list, I hope that this question is sent in the right place.
I have tried finding a solution for my problem, but
Hi Felix,
youre absolutely right and it works like a charm, thank you so much!!
Vielen Dank ;-)
Btw. the www prefix is just working fine if I add the alias to the
tomcat server.xml!
Greetings!
Am 27.07.2010 17:55, schrieb Felix Schumacher:
Hi Moritz,
Am Dienstag, den 27.07.2010, 15:40 +
Hi Moritz,
Am Dienstag, den 27.07.2010, 15:40 +0200 schrieb Moritz Winter:
> My issue is with the mod_jk plugin. I want to redirect my subdomain
> requests jira.example.com to a tomcat 6 virtual host called jiraapp. If
> I call the subdomain jira.example.com Im always getting the default
> tom
Hi, First of all I would like to mention that this is my first post on
this list, I hope that this question is sent in the right place.
I have tried finding a solution for my problem, but it either doesn't
exist, or my limited brain can't manage to figure out how to do it (I
strongly hope it is
-Scott Severtson
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-mod_jk-and-Tomcat-Native-Connectors-on-Solaris-tp21796027p21937252.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsub
Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 11:38 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Problem with mod_jk and Tomcat Native Connectors on Solaris
On 02.02.2009 20:01, Jorge Medina wrote:
>I am having problems with the mod_jk m
On 02.02.2009 20:01, Jorge Medina wrote:
I am having problems with the mod_jk module 1.2.26 and Tomcat Native
connectors running in Solaris 10.
The problem occurs in both processors x86 (64-bit) and sparc (64-bit).
(The problem does not occur on RedHat EL5 64-bit).
On the mod_jk workers
Hi
I am having problems with the mod_jk module 1.2.26 and Tomcat Native
connectors running in Solaris 10.
The problem occurs in both processors x86 (64-bit) and sparc (64-bit).
(The problem does not occur on RedHat EL5 64-bit).
On the mod_jk workers.properties file I am specifying a va
which one is causing the problem with dwr because
they were both causing errors in my log.
So as far as i am concerned the problem was solved.
Thank you to everyone that help me!
- Original Message -
From: "André Warnier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users
quite understanding what you want me to try though.
Do you mean get rid of the current Alias code and replace it with
AliasMatch /dwr-examples/(.*\.(html?|jpg|php))$
/www/tomcat5/webapps/dwr-examples/$1
or use it in addition to it and where exactly should it go?
Prior to the JkMount /dwr-examples/*
ciBDz"]
Thanks alot for the help, your masters!
----- Original Message -
From: "Rainer Jung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 12:07 AM
Subject: Re: Apache mod_jk and Tomcat not working correctly
Wayne Bragg s
Wayne Bragg schrieb:
> my setup:
>WinXP Home
>Wed-Dev install of:
>Apache/2.2.3 (Win32)
>Tomcat 5
>PHP 5.2.0
Before proceeding consider taking more recent minor versions, like
2.2.10, PHP 5.2.6 and you didn't tell us your Tomcat version. Your
mod_jk below is 1.2.19,
AIL PROTECTED]
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache mod_jk and Tomcat not working correctly
> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 19:18:49 -0500
>
> Apache is suppose to serve /dwr-examples and /dwr-examples/dwr just not any
> jsp or jspx that is called for
>
> > Ali
content contained within this transmission.
> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:40:27 +0100
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache mod_jk and Tomcat not working correctly
>
> It's maybe your own fault if you get lost : do not post new messages
: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2008 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: Apache mod_jk and Tomcat not working correctly
I think your Alias at the beginning has "more priority" than your
JkMount later.
Not that the order in the config file matters, that's not what
It's maybe your own fault if you get lost : do not post new messages
with the subject of another thread. It is confusing to everyone, not
just to you.
Re: Tomcat Server .pac Script configuration for outgoing connection.
Wayne Bragg wrote:
I guess you lost me with
if you want a working solu
o say "not .jsp")
Wayne Bragg wrote:
I guess I need to add, going through http port 80 works with no errors
for everything except .jsp to tomcat
- Original Message - From: "Martin Gainty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Sunday, October
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2008 5:41 PM
Subject: RE: Apache mod_jk and Tomcat not working correctly
Please confirm this parameter in $APACHE_HOME/conf/httpd.conf
Listen 80
Martin
__
Disclaimer and confidentiality note
Everything in this e-mail and any at
I guess I need to add, going through http port 80 works with no errors for
everything except .jsp to tomcat
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Gainty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2008 5:41 PM
Subject: RE: Apache mod
Confirmed!
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Gainty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2008 5:41 PM
Subject: RE: Apache mod_jk and Tomcat not working correctly
Please confirm this parameter in $APACHE_HOME/conf/ht
nature and Sender does not
endorse distribution to any party other than intended recipient. Sender does
not necessarily endorse content contained within this transmission.
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Apache mod_jk and Tomcat not working correct
my setup:
WinXP Home
Wed-Dev install of:
Apache/2.2.3 (Win32)
Tomcat 5
PHP 5.2.0
I have mod_jk connector set up the following way according to
instructions:
Alias /dwr-examples "/www/tomcat5/webapps/dwr-examples/"
Options Indexes FollowSymLinks
AllowOverride None
Rainer Jung wrote:
> Christian Schausberger wrote:
>> Rainer Jung wrote:
>>> I would start adding a prepost_timeout. See:
>>>
>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/generic_howto/timeouts.html
>>> and
>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html
>>>
>> Maybe I misundersto
Christian Schausberger wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
I would start adding a prepost_timeout. See:
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/generic_howto/timeouts.html
and
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html
Maybe I misunderstood this directive. connect_timeout only appli
Rainer Jung wrote:
> I would start adding a prepost_timeout. See:
>
> http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/generic_howto/timeouts.html
> and
> http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html
>
Maybe I misunderstood this directive. connect_timeout only applies after
the TCP connect
Christian Schausberger wrote:
Hi,
I use apache-2.2.4 together with mod_jk-1.2.25 to load balance a bunch
of tomcat-5.5.25 servers. All servers are running on Solaris 10 and are
implemented as zones.
The setup works really good during normal operation. But when a server
dies for some reason, and
Hi,
I use apache-2.2.4 together with mod_jk-1.2.25 to load balance a bunch
of tomcat-5.5.25 servers. All servers are running on Solaris 10 and are
implemented as zones.
The setup works really good during normal operation. But when a server
dies for some reason, and with it the zones running tomca
Thank you all for helping, I found the issue was related to SELinux, which
simply needs to be disabled or altered (I just disabled it - and everything
started to work)
--
Eugene N Dzhurinsky
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users
Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:07:18AM -0400, David Smith wrote:
>> What does the connector for port 8009 look like in your server.xml?
>> Does it specify protcol="AJP/1.3"?
>
> port="8009" minProcessors="5" maxProcessors="75"
> acceptCount="10" debug="0" connec
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:56:41AM -0400, David Smith wrote:
> Could be. Software like Symantec Client Firewall tend to operate per
> application. You'd get access, but maybe apache httpd was configured to
> be denied access.
There is no firewall installed at all.
And
su -m apache -c 'telne
Could be. Software like Symantec Client Firewall tend to operate per
application. You'd get access, but maybe apache httpd was configured to
be denied access.
--David
Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote:
I found error code 13 is
./asm/errno.h:#define EACCES 13 /* Permission denied *
I found error code 13 is
./asm/errno.h:#define EACCES 13 /* Permission denied */
could tha mean mod_jk simply isn't allowed to connect to port 8009?
--
Eugene N Dzhurinsky
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@
I upgraded to mod_jk 1.2.18 and still face the same error:
[Mon Aug 28 22:45:04 2006] [25415:26304] [debug]
map_uri_to_worker::jk_uri_worker_map.c (520): Attempting to map context
URI '/user/*'
[Mon Aug 2
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:13:55AM -0400, Steve Ochani wrote:
> > tcpdump shows me that there is NO attemts to make connection to host
> > 127.0.0.1 and port 8009 from within mod_jk, but if I do telnet
> > 127.0.0.1 8009 - it works fine.
> >
> > Really strange
> >
> > Operating system is Fedora c
On 28 Aug 2006 at 17:01, Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote:
> tcpdump shows me that there is NO attemts to make connection to host
> 127.0.0.1 and port 8009 from within mod_jk, but if I do telnet
> 127.0.0.1 8009 - it works fine.
>
> Really strange
>
> Operating system is Fedora core 4,
> and installe
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:07:18AM -0400, David Smith wrote:
> What does the connector for port 8009 look like in your server.xml?
> Does it specify protcol="AJP/1.3"?
it's tomcat 4.1.xx
--
Eugene N Dzhurinsky
-
To start a
What does the connector for port 8009 look like in your server.xml?
Does it specify protcol="AJP/1.3"?
--David
Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote:
Hello!
I'm trying to move Tomcat with it's web-applications from one server to
another, and I facing weird problem:
I copied working configurations for
tcpdump shows me that there is NO attemts to make connection to host 127.0.0.1
and port 8009 from within mod_jk, but if I do telnet 127.0.0.1 8009 - it
works fine.
Really strange
Operating system is Fedora core 4,
and installed software:
jdk1.5.0_07, mod_jk-1.2.6-3jpp_4fc, httpd-2.0.54-10.4
--
netstat -lp | grep 8009 gives me
tcp0 0 *:8009 *:* LISTEN 17119/java
--
Eugene N Dzhurinsky
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional c
Hello!
I'm trying to move Tomcat with it's web-applications from one server to
another, and I facing weird problem:
I copied working configurations for tomcat, mod_jk and httpd, but in
mod_jk.log I can see this:
[Mon Aug 28 21:35:39 2006] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (459)]: Attempting to map URI
'/us
are you rewriting the URLs in each of the pages to maintain the session?
each URL should get modified as a result:
/path/to/file.jsp;jsessiond=00?q=param
what's your jk config?
(unless i've missed something, and given that most people seem to get
this to work OK, it's probably a problem
Markus wrote on Monday, July 31, 2006 5:39 PM:
> Markus wrote on Monday, July 31, 2006 5:34 PM:
>> I've got the following problem on one server using Apache 2.0.54-5
>> (Debian x86) with mod_jk 1.2.15 (self-compiled) and tomcat 5.5.17: I try
>> to
>> create a redirect to a page with a session-id i
Christopher Schultz wrote on Monday, July 31, 2006 11:55 PM:
>>> Some part of your logic is missing: you do not have a case where it
>>> is known that you MUST create a session. Therefore, you never create
>>> a session. Your code tries and tries again (redirecting continuously)
>>> but never creat
Markus,
>> Some part of your logic is missing: you do not have a case where it is
>> known that you MUST create a session. Therefore, you never create a
>> session. Your code tries and tries again (redirecting continuously) but
>> never creates a session because you are not handling the case where
Christopher Schultz wrote on Monday, July 31, 2006 10:08 PM:
> Markus,
>
> If the session is mandatory, I recommend changing:
>
> request.getSession(false)
> to
> request.getSession(true)
Thanks for your quick answer. The problem I want to solve is only to
cr
Markus,
If the session is mandatory, I recommend changing:
request.getSession(false)
to
request.getSession(true)
>>> Thanks for your quick answer. The problem I want to solve is only to
>>> create a session if it is really needed, so #redirectToURLWithSID is a
>>>
Christopher Schultz wrote on Monday, July 31, 2006 9:54 PM:
>>> If the session is mandatory, I recommend changing:
>>>
>>> request.getSession(false)
>>> to
>>> request.getSession(true)
>>
>> Thanks for your quick answer. The problem I want to solve is only to
>> create a session if it is
Markus,
>> If the session is mandatory, I recommend changing:
>>
>> request.getSession(false)
>> to
>> request.getSession(true)
>
> Thanks for your quick answer. The problem I want to solve is only to create
> a session if it is really needed, so #redirectToURLWithSID is a little bit
> mo
Christopher Schultz wrote on Monday, July 31, 2006 6:42 PM:
> Markus,
>
>>> I try to create a redirect to a page with a session-id if there is no
>>> session. Seems to be easy, but in combination with apache/mod_jk my
>>> servlet redirects unlimited because it doesn't recognizes the created
>>> se
Markus,
>> I try to create a redirect to a page with a session-id if there is
>> no session. Seems to be easy, but in combination with apache/mod_jk
>> my servlet redirects unlimited because it doesn't recognizes the
>> created session.
>>
>> Btw: Cookies are disabled, this is important.
It look
Markus wrote on Monday, July 31, 2006 5:34 PM:
> I've got the following problem on one server using Apache 2.0.54-5 (Debian
> x86) with mod_jk 1.2.15 (self-compiled) and tomcat 5.5.17: I try to
> create a redirect to a page with a session-id if there is no session.
> Seems to be easy, but in combin
Hi,
I've got the following problem on one server using Apache 2.0.54-5 (Debian
x86) with mod_jk 1.2.15 (self-compiled) and tomcat 5.5.17: I try to create a
redirect to a page with a session-id if there is no session. Seems to be
easy, but in combination with apache/mod_jk my servlet redirects unli
Hi,
I have the problem that the session-id response.encodeURL adds seems not to
be vaild as on every retry I get a new session-id. That occurres only if I
set up the Context with cookies="false" using mod_jk and apache before
tomcat.
Details:
Using tomcat 5.5.9 over port 8080 behaves as expecte
56 matches
Mail list logo
