mail, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://tomcat.10.x6.nabble.com/max-packet-size-for-data-in-mod-jk-tp5009929p5018705.html
> To unsubscribe from max_packet_size for data in mod_jk, click here
> <http://tomcat.10.x6.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?ma
On 02.01.2014 15:42, frenchc44 wrote:
> Thanks Rainer. To be honest, we don't really know what to expect from a
> larger packet size, but we think it could only help since it would reduce
> round trips between apache/tomcat. My main objective with this thread is to
> confirm my suspicion that the
Thanks Rainer. To be honest, we don't really know what to expect from a
larger packet size, but we think it could only help since it would reduce
round trips between apache/tomcat. My main objective with this thread is to
confirm my suspicion that the max_packet_size is not for request post data
On 31.12.2013 18:44, frenchc44 wrote:
> Due to large payloads, we wanted to increase the max_packet size of the
> mod_jk/ajp layer in order to see if it will help with performance. However,
> it appears the max_packet_size for non- header requests is capped at 8192
> bytes despite the documentation
Due to large payloads, we wanted to increase the max_packet size of the
mod_jk/ajp layer in order to see if it will help with performance. However,
it appears the max_packet_size for non- header requests is capped at 8192
bytes despite the documentation stating that it should be 65536. I am using
m
