Re: java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter vs org.apache.juli.OneLineFormatter

2013-03-11 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Jesse Farinacci wrote: > I am using Java 7, IBM JRE and Apache Tomcat 7.0.37. I am seeing a > strange difference between java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter vs > org.apache.juli.OneLineFormatter: namely, for my applications, the > SimpleFo

Re: java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter vs org.apache.juli.OneLineFormatter

2013-03-09 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2013/3/9 Jesse Farinacci : > Greetings, > > I am using Java 7, IBM JRE and Apache Tomcat 7.0.37. I am seeing a > strange difference between java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter vs > org.apache.juli.OneLineFormatter: namely, for my applications, the > SimpleFormatter will produce lo

Re: java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter vs org.apache.juli.OneLineFormatter

2013-03-09 Thread Mark Thomas
On 09/03/2013 01:38, Jesse Farinacci wrote: > Greetings, > > I am using Java 7, IBM JRE and Apache Tomcat 7.0.37. I am seeing a > strange difference between java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter vs > org.apache.juli.OneLineFormatter: namely, for my applications, the > SimpleFormatte

java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter vs org.apache.juli.OneLineFormatter

2013-03-08 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, I am using Java 7, IBM JRE and Apache Tomcat 7.0.37. I am seeing a strange difference between java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter vs org.apache.juli.OneLineFormatter: namely, for my applications, the SimpleFormatter will produce log records with the Class name included but