Re: incorrect 400 return code if no webapps/ROOT

2006-03-08 Thread Mark Thomas
nord ehacedod wrote: > Thanks Chuck. > > Where does this rule come from? Logic (with a bit of help from the servlet spec) > It seems an odd requirement, especially since ROOT > isn't required to do anything except exist. With > 5.5.16 it can be an empty directory. If there is no root context, t

RE: incorrect 400 return code if no webapps/ROOT

2006-03-08 Thread nord ehacedod
Thanks Chuck. Where does this rule come from? It seems an odd requirement, especially since ROOT isn't required to do anything except exist. With 5.5.16 it can be an empty directory. -- nord __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the

RE: incorrect 400 return code if no webapps/ROOT

2006-03-08 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: nord ehacedod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: incorrect 400 return code if no webapps/ROOT > > Something unusual... > > If webapps/ROOT is not present tc returns: > HTTP/1.x 400 No Host matches server name ... If you have no webapps/ROOT (or webapps/ROOT.

incorrect 400 return code if no webapps/ROOT

2006-03-08 Thread nord ehacedod
Something unusual... If webapps/ROOT is not present tc returns: HTTP/1.x 400 No Host matches server name ... in response to requests for non-existant contexts (such as http://localhost:8080/foobar/). If webapps/ROOT/ exists a 404 is sent. Tested 5.5.15 and 5.5.16 on XP and Solaris. A bug? -- n