On 29/05/2020 05:49, Arshiya Shariff wrote:
> Hi Mark ,
>
>
>
> *We have upgraded the Embedded tomcat version from 9.0.22 to 9.0.35 *and
> tried setting the *keepAliveTimeout/connectionTimeout* to *4ms / -1
> *, via the IntrospectionUtils by extendin
Hi Mark ,
We have upgraded the Embedded tomcat version from 9.0.22 to 9.0.35 and tried
setting the keepAliveTimeout/connectionTimeout to 4ms / -1 , via the
IntrospectionUtils by extending the Connector class:
IntrospectionUtils.setProperty( this, "keepAliveTimeout", Stri
> The BIO connector doesn't complain due to how properties are handled
> internally. The NIO and APR/native connector will log warnings.
OK, good to know. I noticed the default HTTP connector also doesn't warn about
bogus properties. Hadn't checked the rest.
> AJP connections are intended to pe
On 15/11/2010 20:30, Luke Meyer wrote:
> Tomcat 6.0.29, HotSpot 1.6.0_21 on CentOS 5.
>
> I had a problem recently where someone configured a standard AJP connector
> like this:
> maxThreads="250" protocol="AJP/1.3" />
>
> See the typo? &quo
Tomcat 6.0.29, HotSpot 1.6.0_21 on CentOS 5.
I had a problem recently where someone configured a standard AJP connector like
this:
See the typo? "connectionTimeOut" should be "connectionTimeout". Normally
Tomcat complains when you have bogus proper
Thanks all for your help and explanations.
So we will try to find the best value >0 for connectionTimeout in our
application.
Best regards,
Yann
Rémy Maucherat a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:40 PM, yann grostete
wrote:
-with connectionTimeout="0", the process tomca
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:40 PM, yann grostete
wrote:
> -with connectionTimeout="0", the process tomcat uses a huge percentage
> of CPU, even if there is no traffic.
> but we doesn't observe any problem and the response time is good.
Please use a timeout value > 0.
> From: Taylan Develioglu [mailto:tdevelio...@ebuddy.com]
> Subject: Re: CPU usage with APR and connectionTimeout impact
>
> I think a seperate overview of attributes per connector would be
> clearer.
Strongly agree with that. Patches?
> The HTTP connectionTimeout
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Taylan Develioglu
wrote:
>
> I think a seperate overview of attributes per connector would be clearer.
>
+1
Somebody got some time to change it in the TC trunk and cis able to
reate a bugzilla-RFE with a patch?
Any volunteers welcome ;)
Rgds
Gregor
--
just beca
You're right. I missed it. APR has the same attributes as the HTTP
connector.
I think a seperate overview of attributes per connector would be clearer.
The HTTP connectionTimeout description states:
- The number of milliseconds this *Connector* will wait, after accepting
a connection, fo
Hello,
The parameters connectionTimeout and keepAliveTimeout are not on the APR
side. They are attributes of AJP and HTTP connectors.
Setting the value to 0 means no timeout (according to some mail exchange
I found in tomcat mailing list).
No timeout is default value of this attribute.
My
> From: Taylan Develioglu [mailto:tdevelio...@ebuddy.com]
> Subject: Re: CPU usage with APR and connectionTimeout impact
>
> according to the documentation there exists no connectionTimeout
> attribute for the apr connector.
Which documentation is that? Note that the HTTP conne
Funny,
according to the documentation there exists no connectionTimeout
attribute for the apr connector.
Setting the value to '0' could mean all sorts of behavior, no way to
know for sure short of checking the code. (it could mean the connector
will not wait for the uri line at all)
Hello,
In my project, we are using Tomcat 6.0.18, with APR 1.2.12 and tc native
1.1.14 on an Redhat OS (Linux kernel 2.6.18).
There is a behavior that I can't explain:
-with connectionTimeout="0", the process tomcat uses a huge percentage
of CPU, even if there is no traffic.
Bill Barker schrieb:
> "Stacey Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Hi, I am a new member on tomcat mailing list.
>>
>> For tomcat 5.5 - Is there a recommended value for connectionTimeout
>> attribute? How to decide
"Stacey Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi, I am a new member on tomcat mailing list.
>
> For tomcat 5.5 - Is there a recommended value for connectionTimeout
> attribute? How to decide this value?
>
> The documentation says
Hi, I am a new member on tomcat mailing list.
For tomcat 5.5 - Is there a recommended value for connectionTimeout
attribute? How to decide this value?
The documentation says : The number of milliseconds this Connector will
wait, after accepting a connection, for the request URI line to be
think
its "connectionTimeout" and "connection_pool_timeout".
I know where to set "connectionTimeout" it's my server.xml, but not sure
about not sure about "connection_pool_timeout". What's the difference
between these 2 parameters?
connection
like tomcat is not closing idle connections. I read there are
2 parameters that I can tweak idle connection time out with. I think
its "connectionTimeout" and "connection_pool_timeout".
I know where to set "connectionTimeout" it's my server.xml
27;no retries'. I have now commented out
> that line, so it will get the default value of 2.
> It will let you know if it helped.
>
> regards Henk
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk---connectionTimeout-en-connection_pool_timeout-tf4390617.html#a125
w Tomcat version. We now have a split application which is using both
>> Tomcat 5.0 and the other part is using Tomcat 5.5. For tomcat 5.5 we set
>> the
>> connectionTimeout to 10 minutes, for 5.0 it is set to 0 (infinite)
>>
>> For the Tomcat 5.0 connections we do not se
part is using Tomcat 5.5. For tomcat 5.5 we set the
connectionTimeout to 10 minutes, for 5.0 it is set to 0 (infinite)
For Tomcat 5.0 we see lots more ESTABLISHED connections than for Tomcat 5.5.
While I expected it to be the same.
Hmmm. Maybe I'm missing the point, but I would not share
tomcat 5.5 we set the
connectionTimeout to 10 minutes, for 5.0 it is set to 0 (infinite)
For Tomcat 5.0 we see lots more ESTABLISHED connections than for Tomcat 5.5.
While I expected it to be the same.
For the Tomcat 5.0 connections we do not see any errors (except for client
errors).
For the Tomcat 5.5
Last time I checked explicitely was for 5.0.28. That (old) version had a
default of 60 seconds in the code, but it was not functional. You had to
explicitely set a value to enable the timeout.
And yes, having a good fit between connectionTimeout and
connection_pool_timeout should be best in
reply is much appreciated
Mohan
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/connectionTimeout-for-AJP-1.3-in-server.xml-tf3028693.html#a8414904
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I focused on two attributes of the Connector configuration in
server.xml: connectionTimeout and disableUploadTimeout. The former was
set to 2 and the latter to "true". Changing connectionTimeout to 0,
or even to 6 solved the problem.
Reference http://tomcat.apache.org/tom
Available
cc
07/28/2006 01:41 Subject
PMRe: connectionTim
ither on the Apache side or Tomcat side of
> the connector.
> The JBoss/Tomcat 5.0 document states that the default connectionTimeout
> within the AJP 1.3 connector on the Tomcat side is 60 seconds but it does
> not seem to be the case.
>
> I am trying to force this connectionTim
resulting in a large number of Tomcat threads
which are in KeepAlive state as reported by the Tomcat console.
I do not have any timeouts set either on the Apache side or Tomcat side of
the connector.
The JBoss/Tomcat 5.0 document states that the default connectionTimeout
within the AJP 1.3 connector on
message above and is
probably not logged if the above error message if the error message is
not logged.
greetings Henk
-Original Message-
From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: donderdag 25 mei 2006 5:10
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Does connectionTimeout > 0 ca
Yes, it does cause the error in the logs, for the simple reason that Tomcat
closed it's side of the Socket once the connectionTimeout was reached. This
causes mod_jk to error when it tries to reuse the half-closed socket.
Normally, the error is harmless, since mod_jk just reopens a new S
Hi,
We are experimenting with the connectTimeout setting on the tomcat side in
server.xml. We used to have this set to 0 (inifinite), but we were seeing lot
of unused threads and connections on the tomcat side. Thus we set the
connectionTimeout to 20 (200 sec.). After enabling this I
32 matches
Mail list logo
